Bangladesh has formally requested India to facilitate the return of Sheikh Hasina, the deposed Prime Minister of the country, who has been residing in India since August 5, 2024. The interim government in Dhaka has sent a diplomatic note to the Indian government, urging the extradition of the 77-year-old leader, who fled Bangladesh following mass protests that led to the downfall of her 16-year-long regime.

Sheikh Hasina, leader of the Awami League, has been living in exile in India since she was forced to leave amid growing political unrest in Bangladesh. In the wake of her departure, the Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) issued arrest warrants against Hasina, her ministers, advisors, and former military and civil officials, accusing them of “crimes against humanity and genocide.”

Touhid Hossain, the foreign affairs adviser in Bangladesh’s interim government, confirmed the diplomatic communication, saying, “We have sent a note verbale to the Indian government requesting her return for the judicial process in Bangladesh.”

In addition to the note, Jahangir Alam, the Home Advisor, revealed that the government has also sent a formal letter to India’s External Affairs Ministry, emphasizing the need for Hasina’s extradition. He mentioned that there is an existing extradition treaty between the two countries, which could be invoked to facilitate her return.

The diplomatic request comes in the wake of a visit by India’s Foreign Secretary, Vikram Misri, to Bangladesh. During his visit, Misri engaged in candid and constructive discussions with Nobel laureate and Chief Advisor of Bangladesh’s interim government, Muhammad Yunus. Misri also raised concerns over the treatment of minorities in Bangladesh, particularly Hindus, and discussed the increasing tensions between the two countries. According to reports, the issue of Hasina’s stay in India was one of the topics of discussion during Misri’s visit. Yunus reportedly expressed concern over the political statements made by Hasina from her location in India, which have reportedly been exacerbating tensions.

Sheikh Hasina, speaking in a virtual address to Awami League supporters in London, criticized the interim government of Bangladesh and accused Yunus of running a “fascist regime.” She alleged that the new regime under Yunus’s leadership had led to increased attacks on religious minorities and accused the interim government of undermining Bangladesh’s democratic progress. Hasina also lamented the reversal of her administration’s achievements in poverty alleviation, infrastructure development, and the strengthening of democracy.

The political climate in Bangladesh remains fraught with tension as the interim government faces mounting pressure, both domestically and internationally, over its treatment of opposition leaders and political dissent. The unfolding situation continues to capture attention both within Bangladesh and abroad, particularly with regard to the potential return of Sheikh Hasina.

The BJP on Monday released an Aarop Patra or chargesheet against Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party in Delhi ahead of the assembly election.  The event was attended by BJP MP Anurag Singh Thakur and city BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva. 

Speaking to the media, Anurag Thakur said that the AAP promised to make Delhi schools world-class, yet over 2,00,000 students are still deprived of education. He added that AAP also promised 24/7 clean and free water, but today, thousands of families are forced to buy water from tankers after spending money.

The BJP MP continued that the party also promised free clinics and large hospitals in Delhi, but today 70 per cent of patients are compelled to seek treatment in private hospitals. He further mentioned that the AQI level once crossed 1200 and is still above 500. He also pointed out that AAP promised to make Delhi corruption-free, but eight ministers, one MP, and 15 MLAs from their party have already been to jail.

Furthermore, continuing his attack on Atishi-led AAP government, Anurag Thakur highlighted the froth in the river Yamuna. He said that people from Purvanchal used to perform Chhath Puja with devotion and rituals on the banks of the Yamuna but Arvind Kejriwal’s government had polluted the Yamuna so much that now celebrating the festival has stopped.

Mentioning that they need to save Delhi from Kejriwal’s corruption and pollution, the BJP MP appealed to Kejriwal to take a dip in the Yamuna because if it is not cleaned by 2025. He added that they will hold Arvind Kejriwal accountable if Yamuna is not cleaned.

Furthermore, Anurag Thakur alleged that there have been multiple scams in the AAP government including the water board scam, the classroom scam, the Mohalla Clinic scam, the Waqf Board scam, the liquor scam, DTC scandals, and so on. He also asserted that Arvin Kejriwal is a friend of the corrupt and a criminal of Delhi.

He pointed out that AAP is the only government where the health minister, deputy CM, and CM were all in jail. This was not a government for the people but a government for the jail, Thakur said.

Reacting to the allegations, AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal hit back saying that BJP has no agenda to contest elections. He added that the BJP should tell the people of Delhi what they have done for Delhi in 5 years.

Arvind Kejriwal noted that AAP has done a lot of work for Delhiites in terms of electricity, water, women’s travel, roads and many other things. Questioning what work has the BJP done, Kejriwal stated that the law and order situation in Delhi has collapsed. The AAP national convenor also said that the BJP has no Chief Minister face. 

In a high-profile case, former IAS trainee Puja Khedkar has been denied pre-arrest bail by the Delhi High Court in connection with allegations of forgery and cheating. Ms. Khedkar, who was dismissed from service by the Union government on September 7, has claimed she is being targeted due to her filing of a sexual harassment complaint against a senior officer.

The court’s ruling, delivered by Justice Chandra Dhari Singh, stated that Ms. Khedkar’s actions appeared to be part of a “larger conspiracy” aimed at defrauding authorities. The court noted, “The conduct of the petitioner was purely driven with a motive to dupe the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), and all documents allegedly forged by her were intended to exploit benefits meant for disadvantaged groups.”

The charges against Ms. Khedkar, which the court described as “a classic example of fraud,” also led to her being deemed “unfit for appointment.” It was further observed that her actions not only betrayed the UPSC but also the public trust, constituting an offence against the nation at large.

The court indicated the possibility of collusion between Ms. Khedkar’s family members and powerful individuals in fabricating documents to secure undue advantages. This raises the likelihood of the investigation expanding to include other government officials and departments allegedly involved in the conspiracy.

Temporary protection from arrest, which had been earlier granted to Ms. Khedkar, is likely to be revoked following the court’s decision. Both the Delhi Police and the UPSC opposed her bail plea, emphasizing the need for her custody to facilitate a thorough investigation.

The Delhi Police argued that Ms. Khedkar’s custody was critical to interrogate her and identify others involved in what they described as a “deep-rooted conspiracy.” The UPSC, on its part, stressed that the alleged fraud could not have been carried out without external assistance and urged the court to deny bail to ensure an unhindered investigation.

In her defense, Ms. Khedkar maintained her innocence, asserting that the allegations were retaliatory and stemmed from her complaint of sexual harassment. She has denied all charges, including the accusation that she forged documents to gain benefits reserved for disadvantaged groups.

This case highlights significant issues surrounding alleged misuse of administrative systems and raises questions about accountability and integrity within public institutions. Investigations are ongoing, with authorities under pressure to uncover the full extent of the alleged conspiracy.