Megyn Kelly launched a scathing attack on Blake Lively’s $250 million lawsuit against her “It Ends With Us” co-star, Justin Baldoni, dismissing Lively’s claims of sexual harassment as a fabrication.

Kelly, whose personal attorney also represents Baldoni, framed the entire legal battle as a calculated move by Lively, fueled by her own actions rather than genuine victimhood. The crux of Kelly’s argument rests on video footage released by Baldoni’s legal team, showing Lively and Baldoni engaging in playful, flirtatious behaviour during the filming of a montage sequence. This footage, Kelly contends, directly contradicts Lively’s accusations.

Lively’s lawsuit alleges that during a “slow dance scene,” Baldoni crossed a professional boundary by inappropriately touching her and making a comment about her scent. However, Kelly argues that the video depicts a consensual interaction, with both actors clearly aware of the cameras and seemingly comfortable with their physical proximity.

The footage captures them holding hands, nuzzling, and engaging in lighthearted banter, even mentioning each other’s spouses by name. Kelly highlights Lively’s laughter and playful responses throughout the interaction, contrasting this with the serious nature of the alleged harassment. She points out that Lively’s reaction to the situation directly contradicts her later accusations, presenting a clear disconnect between the alleged victim’s behaviour and her public statements.

Kelly’s criticism goes beyond simply disputing the specifics of the alleged incident. She accuses Lively of orchestrating a calculated smear campaign against Baldoni, leveraging her influence and public image to damage his reputation. Kelly suggests that Lively’s cooperation with the New York Times in publicizing the story is evidence of this strategic manoeuvre. The subsequent escalation, including Baldoni’s $400 million countersuit against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, further fuels Kelly’s narrative of a power struggle rather than a genuine legal dispute.

The attorney’s comments strongly suggest that Lively’s damaged reputation is not a consequence of Baldoni’s actions but rather a direct result of her own strategic manoeuvring. Kelly asserts that Lively’s pursuit of a gag order, after allegedly causing significant damage to Baldoni’s career, underscores her intent to silence her opponent and control the narrative.

By analyzing the video evidence and the subsequent legal actions, Kelly paints a picture of Lively as a manipulative actor, leveraging her status to advance a false claim, ultimately concluding that Lively’s actions, not Baldoni’s, are responsible for the current situation. The entire situation, from Kelly’s perspective, highlights the complexities and potential pitfalls of high-profile legal battles within the entertainment industry.

Bollywood actors Shreyas Talpade and Alok Nath find themselves embroiled in a significant legal controversy, named as accused in a cheating and breach of trust case registered at the Murthal police station in Sonipat, Haryana.

The First Information Report (FIR), filed on January 22, lists the two prominent actors among thirteen individuals charged under Sections 316 (2), 318 (2), and 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. These charges encompass criminal breach of trust, cheating, and the fraudulent transfer of property.

The complainant, Sonipat resident Vipul Antil, levelled accusations against the Human Welfare Credit Cooperative Society, registered in Indore under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act of 2002. Antil alleges that the society, active across multiple states, including Haryana, since September 16th, 2016, lured investors with promises of exorbitant returns on fixed deposits (FDs) and recurring deposits (RDs).

The society employed a multi-level marketing strategy, incentivizing agents to recruit additional investors, creating a pyramid scheme structure that ultimately led to widespread financial losses.

Ajeet Singh, the Additional Commissioner of Police (ACP) in Murthal, confirmed the inclusion of Talpade and Nath’s names in the list of accused, based on statements provided by the complainant. Singh clarified that the primary focus of the investigation remains the alleged fraudulent activities of the cooperative society, and the police are currently working to determine the specific roles, if any, played by Talpade and Nath in the alleged scheme. The investigation will delve into the extent of their involvement and whether they directly benefited from the alleged fraudulent activities.

The case has sent ripples through the Bollywood industry, casting a shadow over the careers of both actors. While the details of their alleged involvement remain under investigation, the allegations raise serious questions about their conduct and potential complicity in a scheme that defrauded numerous investors.

Shreyas Talpade’s most recent cinematic appearance was in Kangana Ranaut’s directorial debut, Emergency, a historical drama set during India’s tumultuous Emergency period from 1975 to 1977. Alok Nath, a veteran Bollywood actor, boasts a prolific career spanning over three decades and encompassing over 300 films, establishing him as a familiar face in Indian cinema. The unfolding investigation will determine the extent of their involvement in this complex financial crime and the consequences they may face.

Akshay Kumar and Veer Pahariya’s latest action drama, Sky Force, made its theatrical debut on January 24th, 2025, igniting a firestorm of diverse opinions across social media platforms. The film, inspired by true events surrounding one of the most intense airstrikes between India and Pakistan, has become a battleground of contrasting viewpoints, leaving audiences sharply divided.

While some hail it as a cinematic triumph, others dismiss it as yet another underwhelming offering from the Bollywood powerhouse, Akshay Kumar. This stark dichotomy underscores the film’s failure to achieve a consensus among viewers, leaving its overall impact uncertain.

Supporters of Sky Force enthusiastically celebrate its impressive technical achievements. The cinematography is frequently lauded for its breathtaking visuals, effectively capturing the tension and drama inherent in the storyline.

The background score, too, receives considerable praise for its ability to amplify the emotional impact of key scenes, enriching the overall viewing experience. The sharp screenplay is also commended for its ability to maintain a compelling narrative throughout the film’s runtime.

Conversely, the film’s detractors point to a plethora of shortcomings. Many critics express disappointment with Akshay Kumar’s performance, suggesting a lack of dedication to the role and a reliance on a teleprompter. The storyline itself is frequently criticized for its predictable plot points and underdeveloped characters, failing to resonate with many viewers.

The film’s pacing also comes under fire, with some claiming a disjointed narrative structure that hinders the overall viewing experience. The CGI, a crucial component in any aerial action film, is deemed underwhelming by many, further diminishing the film’s appeal. Comparisons to other recent action films, notably Fighter, are frequently made, often to Sky Force’s detriment.

Despite these criticisms, Akshay Kumar’s portrayal of his character garners some positive feedback, with certain viewers praising his performance as the film’s saving grace. However, even this praise is tempered by the overall criticisms levied against the movie’s narrative and technical aspects.

In essence, Sky Force remains a deeply divisive film, failing to garner widespread critical acclaim. While its technical achievements are undeniable, the film’s flaws in terms of storyline, character development, and certain aspects of the acting performance prevent it from reaching its full potential.

The film’s ultimate success will hinge on whether its box office performance can overcome the negative feedback and divided audience response. Only time will tell whether Sky Force will achieve a lasting impact.