English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

China lone critic of India-Vietnam Akash pact

Published

on

China lone critic of India-Vietnam Akash pact

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]By Sujit Bhar

India’s decision to sell the sophisticated Akash missile systems to Vietnam has drawn strong reactions from sections of the Chinese media. They range from a virtual warning from their state-run media to derision from columnists. The international media, on the other hand, has treated this with optimism as has the Indian media.

In the face of it, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Look East policy could project Vietnam as a strong hub amid the network that India hopes to build. The UD $ 500 million line of credit, upped from the US $ 100 million October 2014 understanding when the then-Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung visited India is a critical pitch that could put an unwanted Indian finger in already convoluted South China Sea pie.

Akash is a medium range surface-to-air missile (SAM) that India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation has manufactured. With a range of 25km, it can easily target aircraft, helicopters and drones. India’s Varunastra anti-submarine torpedoes are also for sale if Vietnam so wishes. Theoretically, these can easily be used by Vietnam on neighbours China during conflict.

The Indian line was clear from Modi’s October statement last year. He had said: “Our defence cooperation with Vietnam is among our most important ones. India remains committed to the modernization of Vietnam’s defence and security forces.”

This “treaty” has three angles. First, this will represent a disruptive Indian presence in an area where China is upping the ante, a tit-for-tat, so to say, for China’s presence in Pakistan. Secondly, it could be an Indian foreign policy success story that can translate to major trade deals in the area. And third, a budding Indian defence industry wants to expand like the Chinese defence industry is. India’s aim in weapons export is US $ 2 billion. China has boosted its weapons export to US $ 6 billion in a short time.

Indian Defence Research Wing (IDRW) in an article says: “Bilateral defence education and training programmes are also growing, as witnessed in rising Indian assistance to the Information Technology and Foreign Languages Training Center at the Signal Officers Training School in Nha Trang… India has agreed to train Vietnamese pilots on Russian-built SU-30s and Sukhoi fighter jets and currently trains Vietnamese submarine operators on Russia-produced Kilo-class submarines.”

This shows that the understanding has now deepened and has seen years of strategic build-up on wither side, a positive step.

The Wall Street Journal has reported: “Defence analysts say the weapons are ideally suited to taking out naval targets. In seeking to upgrade military capabilities as China improves its own capabilities, Vietnam has emerged as the world’s eighth-largest arms importer from 2011 to 2015, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

“Indian warships have also made a point of visiting Vietnamese ports, part of Hanoi’s own policy of encouraging more international navies into the contested waters of the South China Sea, where both Vietnam and China have overlapping claims to some of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.”

The Journal also observes: “Carlyle Thayer, emeritus professor and a Vietnam expert at the Australian Defence Force Academy, notes that the Indian leader’s visit to Vietnam follows high-level Chinese visits to Pakistan last year, where China is helping to finance the development and expansion of the deep-water port at Gwadar on the Arabian Sea.”

The Diplomat, a Tokyo-based journal on South Asia has said: “India has also considered offering Vietnam the considerably more advanced BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, pending consent for the sale from Russia, a co-developer of the BrahMos. India and Russia are reported to have resolved intellectual property issues that had held up talks with Vietnam over the BrahMos.” That sale has been scuppered thereafter, as Russia has yet to agree, but the issue remains on the table, as a threat to China.

An op-ed article in China’s Global Times was critical of the deal. In the article, headlined ‘India-Vietnam sea cooperation will be limited’, the author writes: “India and Vietnam seem to share quite a few common interests and similarities in terms of their policies toward Beijing. They both have complicated and unresolved border disputes with China. They both have bitter history of being defeated in border wars with China…”

He goes on to write: “Under (sic) such a backdrop, Modi’s visit to Vietnam has without doubt made Indians associate the tour with many strategic meanings, believing that New Delhi and Hanoi might jointly pile pressure on Beijing.

“As far as I am concerned, such a possibility cannot be totally excluded, but it will not play a vital role either. India has always been cautious when it comes to directly putting the screw on China. In this regard, the US has never stopped drawing New Delhi over to its side for its rebalance to the Asia-Pacific strategy, but India only showed reluctance toward it and has not responded to Washington actively. This has made the White House quite grouchy.”

On the side, China has warned Vietnam on the outcome if it signs this deal with India. One has to remember that China not only contributes heavily to Vietnamese development, Vietnam is a huge tourist destination for the Chinese, bringing in rich foreign currency.

This will be a critical and quizzical issue for Vietnam and India.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

India closely monitoring situation in Iran, urges nationals to leave

India has advised its citizens in Iran to leave the country as authorities closely monitor the deteriorating security situation, with nearly 9,000 Indians currently residing there.

Published

on

The Indian government on Friday said it is closely monitoring the evolving security situation in Iran and has advised Indian nationals currently in the country to leave using available means. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stressed that ensuring the safety and well-being of Indian citizens remains a priority.

Speaking during the weekly media briefing in New Delhi, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said approximately 9,000 Indians are presently residing in Iran, with students forming the majority of the community. He said the government has issued multiple advisories in response to recent developments.

“In light of the situation, we have advised Indian citizens in India not to travel to Iran at this time, and those currently residing there have been asked to leave the country by whatever means are available,” Jaiswal said.

The spokesperson added that the government is maintaining close vigilance over developments and is prepared to take necessary steps for the welfare of Indian nationals.

Embassy advisories and travel warnings

The Indian Embassy in Tehran has issued an advisory asking Indian citizens — including students, businesspersons, pilgrims and tourists — to depart Iran through available transport options, including commercial flights, citing the evolving security environment.

Separately, the MEA reiterated its advisory urging Indians to avoid travel to Iran until further notice. It also recalled an earlier warning issued on January 5, advising Indian nationals in Iran to remain cautious and refrain from participating in protests or demonstrations.

Indian citizens in Iran have been asked to keep essential travel and identification documents, including passports, readily accessible. Those living in the country on resident visas have also been advised to register with the Indian Embassy.

Protests and regional tensions

The advisories come against the backdrop of nationwide protests in Iran, which began at Tehran’s Grand Bazaar in late December following a sharp fall in the Iranian rial. The demonstrations later spread across the country amid mounting economic challenges, including inflation, unemployment, power outages and water shortages.

Regional tensions have also risen amid international warnings of possible military action if the situation escalates further. These developments have prompted several countries, including India, to review travel advisories and safety measures for their citizens in Iran.

India has maintained long-standing ties with Iran, though officials have indicated that recent international trade-related announcements linked to Tehran are expected to have a limited impact, given the relatively small share of bilateral trade in India’s overall commerce.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump calls it a wonderful gesture as Machado presents him Nobel Peace Prize medal

Donald Trump described it as a “wonderful gesture” after Venezuela’s opposition leader Maria Corina Machado presented him with her Nobel Peace Prize medal during a White House meeting.

Published

on

donald-trump

US President Donald Trump has described it as a “wonderful gesture” after Venezuela’s opposition leader Maria Corina Machado presented him with her Nobel Peace Prize medal during a meeting at the White House.

Trump praised Machado publicly after the interaction, saying she had been through “so much” and that the act reflected “mutual respect.” He said the medal was given to him for the work he has done, according to his post on his social media platform.

The gesture, however, has drawn attention as the Nobel Institute has clarified that a Nobel Peace Prize cannot be transferred to another individual.

Nobel Institute rules out transfer of prize

The Nobel Institute has stated that Machado is not permitted to give her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump. Despite this, a White House official confirmed that Trump intends to keep the medal, even if the act remains symbolic.

Trump has long expressed interest in the Nobel Peace Prize, making the episode particularly notable despite the formal limitations placed on such honours.

Political context behind the meeting

Machado had been widely regarded as Venezuela’s democratic leader-in-waiting before Trump’s recent policy decisions regarding the country. Earlier this month, Trump declined to fully back her challenge to Venezuela’s ruling regime and instead signalled openness to engaging with leaders linked to the existing power structure.

Trump has publicly questioned Machado’s ability to lead, saying she lacks sufficient support and respect within Venezuela. Her political party is believed to have won the 2024 elections, results that were rejected by President Nicolas Maduro.

Trump has also indicated a willingness to work with acting President Delcy Rodriguez, who previously served as Maduro’s deputy.

What Machado said after the meeting

Speaking to reporters after leaving the White House and heading to Capitol Hill, Machado said she presented the medal to the US president as recognition of his “unique commitment” to Venezuela’s freedom.

She added that Trump did not provide detailed assurances during their closed-door discussion, including on the issue of elections in Venezuela. No further specifics of the meeting were disclosed.

Afterwards, Machado greeted supporters gathered near the White House gates, hugging several of them. Addressing the crowd, she said they could count on President Trump, prompting brief chants of appreciation from those present.

Machado’s recent public appearance

Before her visit to Washington, Machado had largely stayed out of public view since travelling to Norway last month, where her daughter accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf. She had spent nearly a year in hiding in Venezuela before appearing at the ceremony.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US freezes immigrant visa processing for 75 countries, India not in list

The United States suspends immigrant visa processing for 75 countries, excluding temporary visas, as part of stricter immigration measures.

Published

on

The United States has indefinitely suspended immigrant visa processing for 75 countries, targeting individuals seeking permanent residency based on nationality. The move, set to take effect on January 21, excludes tourist and temporary work visas, but is expected to have a significant impact on family-based immigration.

Reasons behind the visa freeze

The US State Department said the suspension aims to prevent the entry of foreign nationals likely to require government welfare and public benefits. “The Trump administration is bringing an end to the abuse of America’s immigration system by those who would extract wealth from the American people,” said State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott.

While the administration cites the risk of immigrants draining government resources, studies by the Cato Institute and other research groups suggest immigrants generally use fewer benefits than US-born citizens.

Who will not be affected

Temporary visas for tourists, business travelers, and sports fans remain unaffected. Exceptions are also allowed for individuals with dual nationality, a valid passport from a country not on the list, or travel serving an “America First” national interest. Approved visas that have not yet been printed must be refused according to the State Department.

Countries affected

The visa freeze covers nations across Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. Some of the most affected countries include Pakistan, Bangladesh, Somalia, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, Brazil, Nigeria, and Thailand.

Other countries on the full list include Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Myanmar, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, North Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, and Yemen.

Trump administration immigration record

The Trump administration has already imposed stricter vetting procedures over the past year, revoking over 100,000 visas and deporting more than 605,000 people, with 2.5 million others leaving voluntarily. Critics highlight that the policy disproportionately affects immigrants from non-European countries.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com