English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

India wins Kishangana battle against Pakistan at International Court

Published

on

India wins Kishangana battle against Pakistan at International Court

World Bank asks Pakistan to withdraw petition and accept neutral expert

India has won another diplomatic war against Pakistan on Kishanganga dam issue. The World Bank has advised Pakistan to withdraw from its stand of referring the dispute to the International Court of Arbitration (ICA) and instead accept India’s offer of appointing a “neutral expert”.

According to Pakistan’s leading daily Dawn, World Bank president Jim Yong Kim has, last week, advised Islamabad to withdraw from its stand of taking the matter to the ICA.

India describes Kishanganga dam issue as differences between two countries over the design of the dam and, therefore, it should be addressed by some neutral experts.

But Pakistan considers the construction of the dam in Jammu and Kashmir over the waters flowing into the western rivers a violation of the Indus Waters Treaty 1960. Islamabad considers that it will not only alter the course of the river but also deplete the water level of the rivers flowing into Pakistan. Hence the dispute should be referred to the international court of arbitration.

Read More: Dawn: Pakistan lost diplomatic battle on Kishanganga dam

Dawn, quoting a source privy to the development, reports that Pakistan believed that acceding to India’s proposal of referring the dispute to neutral experts or withdrawing its stand would mean closing the doors of arbitration and surrendering its right of raising disputes before international courts. The unnamed official said, “It will become a precedent and every time a dispute emerges between Pakistan and India, the latter will always opt for dispute resolution through neutral experts.”

India wins Kishangana battle against Pakistan at International CourtIn November 2016, The World Bank had even picked a US chief justice, the rector of Imperial College, London, and the WB president for appointing chairman of the court to resolve the dispute over the dam.

However, in December  2016, the WB president had informed Pakistan that he had decided to “pause” the process of appointing the International Court of Arbitration (ICA) chairman as well as the neutral expert.

The World Bank did not heed to Pakistan’s concern when provided with satellite images showing the ongoing construction at the dam. The bank even did not allow staying the construction of the dam.

Read More: World Bank fails to reach agreement with Pakistan on Indus Waters dispute

The 1960 treaty recognizes the WB as an arbitrator in water disputes between the two countries as played it played a key role in concluding this agreement. It allows India to have control over the water flowing into three eastern rivers- Beas, Ravi and Sutlej, also permitting India to use the water of western rivers-Chenab, Jhelum and Indus. However, it does not allow India to divert the flow of the water.

India considers this as a permission to build “run-of-the-river” hydel projects that neither change the course of the river nor deplete the water level downstream.

According to Wikipedia, the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Plant is part of a run-of- the-river hydroelectric scheme that is designed to divert water from the Kishanganga River to a power plant in the Jhelum river basin. It is located 5-km north of Bandipore in Jammu and Kashmir.

India wins Kishangana battle against Pakistan at International CourtThe construction of the dam was temporarily halted by ICA in October 2011 due to Pakistan’s protest of its effect on the flow of the Kishanganga River, which is known as Neelam River in Pakistan.

Read More: Pakistan reaches to World Bank against India on Kishanganga dam

However, in February 2013, the ICA ruled that India could divert all the water leaving a minimum amount to the downstream of the dam for the purpose of environmental flows.

First unit of 110 MW capacity was tested in March this year, while all three units of equal capacity were commissioned and synchronized with the electricity grid by 30 March. Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the project on 19 May 2018.

Latest world news

Suicide bombing at Islamabad imambargah kills 69, over 160 injured

At least 69 people were killed after a suicide bomber detonated explosives at a Shia shrine in Islamabad’s Shehzad Town area, triggering a city-wide emergency.

Published

on

Suicide bombing at Islamabad Shrine

A suicide bombing at a Shia place of worship in Pakistan’s capital Islamabad left at least 69 people dead and more than 160 injured on Friday, according to media reports.

The explosion took place at Tarlai Imambargah, located in the Shehzad Town area, when a suicide bomber detonated explosives near the main gate of the shrine during afternoon hours.

Attacker stopped at entrance, officials say

Security officials were quoted as saying that the attacker was intercepted by guards at the entrance, preventing him from entering the main hall where worshippers had gathered. Despite this, the blast caused extensive damage to the gate and nearby structures.

Visuals from the scene showed shattered windows of surrounding buildings and debris scattered across the road following the explosion.

Emergency declared, injured shifted to hospitals

Following the blast, the Islamabad Inspector General of Police declared a city-wide emergency, as rescue and law enforcement teams rushed to the site amid fears of high casualties.

The injured were shifted to Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) and Polyclinic Hospital for treatment.

Prime minister condemns attack

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed deep grief over the attack and strongly condemned the bombing at the Shiite mosque in Islamabad.

In a statement, he said the incident was a tragic act of violence and offered condolences to the families of those killed. Official statements noted that dozens were injured in the attack, with treatment ongoing at city hospitals.

Previous attack referenced

The incident comes less than three months after a suicide blast outside a district and sessions court building in Islamabad on November 11, 2025, in which 12 people were killed and over 30 injured.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Suicide bombing at Islamabad shrine kills 10, over 20 injured

A suicide bombing at a Shia shrine in Islamabad’s Shehzad Town area killed at least 10 people and injured over 20, prompting a city-wide emergency.

Published

on

Suicide bombing at Islamabad Shrine

At least 10 people were killed and around 20 others sustained injuries after a suicide bomber detonated explosives at a Shia shrine in Pakistan’s capital, Islamabad, on Friday afternoon.

The explosion took place at Tarlai Imambargah, located in the Shehzad Town area, when the attacker set off the device at the main entrance of the place of worship, where devotees had gathered.

Bomber stopped at entrance, say officials

Security officials said alert guards intercepted the attacker at the gate, preventing him from entering the main hall of the shrine. The timely action is believed to have reduced the scale of casualties inside the premises.

However, the blast caused significant damage to the gate structure. Visuals from the site showed shattered windows of nearby buildings and debris scattered across the road following the explosion.

Emergency declared across Islamabad

In the aftermath of the attack, the Islamabad Inspector General of Police declared a city-wide emergency. Rescue teams and law enforcement personnel rushed to the site amid concerns that the casualty count could rise.

The injured were shifted to Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) and Polyclinic Hospital for treatment.

Recent history of suicide attacks in the capital

The incident comes less than three months after a suicide bombing outside a district and sessions court building in Islamabad on November 11, 2025, which killed 12 people and injured more than 30 others, raising renewed concerns over security in the capital.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Bangladesh rushes to finalise US trade deal after India secures lower tariffs

Bangladesh is accelerating talks with the US to finalise a trade agreement after India secured lower tariffs, raising concerns over export competitiveness and transparency.

Published

on

Bangladesh is moving quickly to finalise a trade agreement with the United States after India concluded a deal with Washington that lowered tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent. The development has triggered concern in Dhaka that Bangladesh could lose market share in the US if it fails to secure comparable or better terms.

The US and Bangladesh are expected to sign the agreement on February 9, just three days before the country’s national election scheduled for February 12. The timing and lack of transparency surrounding the deal have drawn criticism from economists, business leaders and political observers.

Bangladesh’s economy is heavily dependent on ready-made garment exports, which account for nearly 90 per cent of its exports to the US. Any tariff disadvantage compared to India could significantly impact export orders and employment in the sector.

Tariff cuts under negotiation

The proposed agreement follows a series of tariff revisions imposed by Washington. In April 2025, the US imposed a steep 37 per cent tariff on Bangladeshi goods. This was reduced to 35 per cent in July and further lowered to 20 per cent in August.

According to reports, the upcoming deal is expected to bring tariffs down further to around 15 per cent. Officials see this as critical to keeping Bangladeshi exports competitive against Indian products in the US market.

Secrecy around negotiations raises concerns

Concerns have intensified due to the confidential nature of the negotiations. In mid-2025, the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus signed a formal non-disclosure agreement with the US, committing to keep tariff and trade discussions confidential.

No draft of the agreement has been shared with the public, parliament or industry stakeholders. A commerce adviser had earlier stated that the deal would not go against national interests and could be made public with US consent.

Policy experts, however, argue that the lack of disclosure prevents meaningful debate on the agreement’s long-term implications.

Conditions reportedly linked to the deal

Media reports suggest that the agreement may include several conditions. These include reducing imports from China, increasing military procurement from the US, and allowing American goods easier access to the Bangladeshi market.

It is also reported that Bangladesh may be required to accept US standards and certifications without additional scrutiny. Inspections on US vehicle imports and parts could reportedly be eased to facilitate smoother entry into the local market.

A senior policy analyst described the process as opaque, noting that signing the agreement just days before elections could bind the hands of the next elected government.

Garment industry left in the dark

Bangladesh exports garments and textiles worth between $7 billion and $8.4 billion annually to the US, accounting for nearly 96 per cent of its total exports to the American market. In comparison, Bangladesh imports around $2 billion worth of goods from the US.

With India and Bangladesh exporting similar apparel products, lower tariffs for India could shift US buyers towards Indian suppliers. Industry leaders warn that this could put millions of jobs at risk in Bangladesh’s garment sector, which employs 4 to 5 million workers, most of them women.

The sector contributes over 80 per cent of Bangladesh’s export earnings and nearly 20 per cent of its GDP.

A senior garment exporters’ association official said the agreement carries major implications and should ideally have been signed after the election to allow broader political and public discussion.

Political timing draws criticism

Economists and analysts have also questioned why an unelected interim administration is finalising a major trade agreement so close to national elections. They argue that responsibility for implementing the deal will fall on the incoming elected government.

A prominent economist criticised the process as lacking transparency and warned that the country could be pushed into long-term commitments without adequate scrutiny or public consent.

Meanwhile, US diplomats have indicated openness to engaging with various political forces in Bangladesh, including Jamaat-e-Islami, which has been banned multiple times in the country’s history.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com