English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

US vs China over Taiwan: Here’s what’s happening

Joe Biden has once again made people wonder about his stance on Taiwan after indicating that the US will assist Taiwan if China tries to invade the self-ruled island.

Published

on

joe biden
With this move, is Biden making the world wonder about his stance on Taiwan?

This is the third time in the last few months that US President Joe Biden’s comments on Taiwan have stirred controversy. Biden on Monday indicated that it would assist Taiwan with military defences and forces if China ever tries to invade and take over the self-ruled island.

Biden, who joined Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in a news conference in Tokyo, said it is the commitment the country has earlier made to protect Taiwan from a Chinese attack.

The White House promptly played down his remarks, claiming that he did not indicate a change in US policy. It’s the third time in recent months that Biden has claimed that the US would defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion, only for the White House to retract those words.

Why is the US helping Taiwan against Chinese attacks?

The United States has soldiers deployed in Taiwan to provide military security in order to safeguard Taiwan’s development and turn the crisis into peace. This pact is multi-purpose in nature, encompassing political, military, economic, and social welfare. The Taiwan Ties Act of 1979 governs US-Taiwan relations and specifies the US commitment to assist Taiwan in maintaining its armed security.

Read Also: Gyanvapi masjid case: Varanasi court to continue hearing on May 26, allows Muslim, Hindu parties to file objections to video survey

Why is Biden’s statement about deploying military forces in Taiwan making the White House defend his words?

People are arguing that Biden’s statement about deploying military forces to Taiwan to back the self-ruled island from Chinese attacks is against the One China policy. According to a White House official, Biden was not articulating a shift in US policy toward Taiwan, a self-governing island that China considers a renegade province that should be reunified with the mainland.

What is the One China policy?

The United States’ policy of One China has been in place for a long time and is the foundation of its relationship with Beijing. As a result of the policy, the US broke official diplomatic connections with the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan and built relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing.

On January 1, 1979, the People’s Republic of China and the United States of America agreed to join each other and establish diplomatic relations. According to the policy, the US recognizes the People’s Republic of China as China’s sole legal government. And the people of the United States will preserve cultural, commercial, and other informal ties with the people of Taiwan in this environment.

More elements are included in the One China Policy, such as the US goal of a peaceful cross-Strait dispute settlement mechanism and its distinct perception of Taiwan’s legal position from Beijing’s.

Was there ever a two Chinas system?

The Republic of China shifted its capital to Taipei, Taiwan, after communist forces won the Chinese civil war in 1949, after a two-decade struggle. Beijing was designated as the capital of the People’s Republic of China.

Read Also: Rahul Gandhi says there is nothing Hindu in Hindu nationalism if they want to murder and beat people

Both governments claimed to represent China as a whole, although only a few people recognized the PRC at the time. The PRC did not gain entry to the UN until 1971 when Resolution 2758 ousted the ROC as the official representative of China. Until 1979, the United States failed to acknowledge the PRC.

Is Biden really shifting from the One China policy?

Speaking at a news conference about the One China policy, Biden said that even though there is only one legal government in China but that doesn’t mean that the jurisdiction can go ahead and use force to take over Taiwan as it will dislocate the entire region.

One of the reasons, he stated, is that Russia will have to pay a heavy price for its invasion of Ukraine. Despite the fact that the US is significantly arming Ukraine’s military and giving intelligence support, Biden has stated that he will not send soldiers to fight against Russian forces. This might result in a nuclear-armed world war.

The Biden government, on the other hand, has criticized Beijing for its military aggression towards Taiwan, which includes flying jets inside the island’s air defence zone. Despite the crisis in Ukraine, Biden’s five-day journey to Asia was intended to send a message that he is still paying attention to the region.

With this move, is Biden making the world wonder about his stance on Taiwan?

Congress forms panel for 2024 polls, 2 Congress rebels back in panel, Prashant Kishor’s ex-associate to lead party’s poll campaign

Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann sacks health minister Vijay Singla over complaints of corruption, Singla arrested

Latest world news

Putin deliberately chose Christmas to attack, says Zelensky as Russia targets Ukrainian energy infrastructure

The Ukrainian Air Force stated that multiple missiles had been launched at the Kharkiv, Dnipro, and Poltava regions in the east.

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin chose Christmas Day deliberately to launch a brutal assault on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, resulting in widespread explosions throughout the country, said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday.

The attack involved a significant barrage of missiles and drones aimed at critical energy facilities, including a thermal power plant, prompting citizens to seek refuge in metro stations on Christmas morning.

“Today, Putin intentionally chose Christmas for this attack. What could be more inhumane?” Zelensky remarked, asserting that Russia is resolutely pursuing a strategy to cause blackouts across Ukraine.

He emphasised that each large-scale Russian strike necessitates careful preparation, stating, “It is never a spontaneous decision. It is a deliberate choice—not only of targets but also of timing.”

In his statement on X, Zelensky reported that more than 70 missiles, including ballistic types, and over 100 attack drones were launched at Ukraine’s power infrastructure.

Ukrainian Vice Prime Minister Oleksii Kuleba said that at least one person was killed in the Dnipro region due to the attacks. He noted that heating services were disrupted for 155 residential buildings in Ivano-Frankivsk and that around 500,000 residents, or 2,677 buildings, in the Kharkiv region, were left without heat.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha mentioned that one Russian missile had passed through Moldovan and Romanian airspace. He added that Ukraine managed to intercept at least 50 missiles and a considerable number of drones during the attack.

Ukrainian Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko stated that Russia had significantly targeted the country’s energy infrastructure again in a Facebook post. The Ukrainian Air Force stated that multiple missiles had been launched at the Kharkiv, Dnipro, and Poltava regions in the east.

“The electricity distribution system operator is implementing necessary measures to limit consumption in order to reduce the negative impact on the power system,” he explained. “Once the security situation permits, energy workers will assess the damage.”

DTEK, Ukraine’s largest private energy company, reported that a Russian strike hit one of their thermal power plants on the morning of December 25, 2024, marking the 13th attack on Ukraine’s power grid this year. CEO Maxim Timchenko condemned the assault on X, stating, “Denying light and warmth to millions of peace-loving people celebrating Christmas is a depraved and evil act that must be answered.”

In response to the massive missile attack, the Ukrainian state energy operator, Ukrenergo, implemented preemptive power outages nationwide, resulting in electricity shortages in several districts of Kyiv.

In Kharkiv, at least seven strikes ignited fires throughout the city, as reported by regional head Oleh Syniehubov on Telegram. Authorities confirmed at least three injuries. Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov warned residents, “Kharkiv is under heavy missile fire. A series of explosions have occurred in the city, and ballistic missiles are still incoming. Please stay in safe locations.”

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Russia-bound Azerbaijan Airlines plane with 60 passengers crashes near Kazakhstan’s Aktau

Azerbaijan Airlines in a statement said the flight had made an emergency landing approximately three kilometres near Aktau.

Published

on

Russia-bound Azerbaijan Airlines plane with 60 passengers crashes near Kazakhstan’s Aktau

Many people are feared dead after a plane carrying 60 people crashed while making an emergency landing near Kazakhstan’s Aktau city on Wednesday. The authorities said that twelve people survived the crash.

Russian news agencies reported that Azerbaijan Airlines flight J2-8243 was en route from Baku to Grozny in Russia, but was rerouted due to fog in Grozny.

Furthermore, Kazakh media had initially reported that 110 people – 105 passengers and five crew members were on board. Later, the authorities revised the number to 72 – 67 passengers and five crew members.

A visual showed the moment the plane loses altitude and makes a rapid descent before it crashes and bursts into flames. As the plane crashes, plumes of smoke are seen rising on the spot. The plane crashed into an open field and burst into flames.

Kazakhstan’s emergency ministry stated that emergency services extinguished the fire at the crash site, adding that survivors were rushed to a nearby hospital for medical assistance.

Azerbaijan Airlines in a statement said the flight had made an emergency landing approximately three kilometres near Aktau. It added that the Embraer 190 aircraft operated by Azerbaijan Airlines, flight numbered J2-8243 on the Baku-Grozny route, made an emergency landing approximately three kilometres near the city of Aktau. Additional information regarding the incident will be provided to the public, it mentioned. Reports stated that the authorities said they had begun looking into different possible versions of what had happened, including a technical problem.

Meanwhile, in another recent deadly plane crash, 10 people died on Sunday after a small aircraft crashed in a Brazilian town that’s popular with tourists. The 10 deceased were passengers and crew on board. Over a dozen people on the ground were injured in the incident, Brazil’s Civil Defence Agency said.

The Civil Defence Agency said that the plane hit the chimney of a home and then the second floor of a building before crashing into a mobile phone shop in a largely residential neighbourhood of Gramado.  It was not immediately clear what caused the crash.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

YouTuber Zara Dar clarifies misconceptions, denies being Pakistani, and explains decision to quit PhD for OnlyFans

Published

on

Zara Dar clarifies her background and career change in a social media post

YouTuber Zara Dar, who sparked significant attention after revealing she was leaving her PhD studies to pursue a full-time career on OnlyFans, has addressed a series of misconceptions circulating about her. In a series of posts on social media platform X, Dar clarified the misinformation and took the opportunity to set the record straight on several points, particularly regarding her background and career shift.

The controversy began when Zara posted a video explaining her decision to quit her PhD in engineering and focus on adult content creation. The video quickly went viral, with some viewers misinterpreting or distorting the details of her story. One of the most prevalent rumors was that Zara Dar was of Pakistani origin.

In her clarification, Zara stated, “With all due respect, I am not Pakistani. I am American, born and raised, with a mixed background: American, Persian, Southern European, Middle Eastern, and Indian.” She explained that her name, “Darcy,” which she shortens to “Dar,” led to confusion, as it resembled that of a different Pakistani influencer, Zara Dar.

Zara also addressed the emergence of fake content under her name, including deepfake videos, and vehemently denied any associations with such material. She emphasized that, despite the false claims, she had not given any exclusive interviews and had only used social media to share her story.

Regarding her decision to leave academia, Zara shared that her shift to OnlyFans, while financially rewarding, also provided her with the freedom she felt was missing in her academic career. “It has given me the freedom to learn and share new content,” she stated, adding that while she had stepped away from her PhD, she would still continue to create educational content on her YouTube channel.

The announcement sent shockwaves across her fanbase, as many were surprised by her drastic career change. However, Zara explained that the decision was motivated not only by financial viability but also by her desire for personal autonomy outside the rigid structures of academia.

As Zara Dar continues to navigate the shift from academia to content creation, she remains committed to building her brand while tackling the misinformation surrounding her. Through her candid social media posts, she aims to keep her followers informed and provide clarity on her personal and professional choices.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com