English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Saudi Arabia extends ultimatum, Qatar remains reluctant

Published

on

Saudi Arabia extends ultimatum, Qatar remains reluctant

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Internal Crisis forces Saudis to punish Doha

By Abu Turab

The US supported Kuwait’s mediation for resolving crisis between Saudi Arabia plus three allies and Qatar seems to be working. On Kuwait’s Emir Sheikh Sabah al-Sabah’s request, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain and Egypt, on Sunday morning, agreed to extend their 10 day ultimatum by another 48 hours. The ultimatum expired Sunday midnight.

The joint statement was released through SPA the official news agency of Saudi Arabia while KUNA the Kuwait’s official news agency claimed that Emir received a response from Qatar regarding 13 point demands presented by Saudi led block of Arab countries.

The foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia-led group of four countries will review Qatar’s response in a meeting scheduled to be held in Cairo on Wednesday. Egypt’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ahmed Abu Zeid, was quoted as saying, “At the invitation of  foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, there will be a quartet meeting of the foreign ministers of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain in Cairo on Wednesday July 5 to follow up on the developing situation regarding relations with Qatar.”

Saudi Arabia and its allies severed diplomatic ties with Qatar on June 5, sparking worst diplomatic crisis in decades. Qatari citizens were ordered to leave these countries and various steps were taken against Qatari companies and financial institutions. All land and air links were also severed.

On June 22, Saudi Arabia led block of Arab countries presented a list of 13 demands and gave Qatar ten days to comply.

Meanwhile Qatar’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, while speaking to journalist on Saturday in Rome said, “The list of demands is made to be rejected. The state of Qatar …is rejecting it as a principle. We are willing to engage in providing the proper conditions for further dialogue.”

Meanwhile QNA, the official Qatari News Agency, has reported that Foreign Minister will inform the ruler of Kuwait of Qatar’s response on Monday.

However, the US administration headed by Donald Trump, who initially justified Saudi led bloc action against Qatar, has been giving varying responses. A Department of State official said on Sunday that US encourages “all parties to exercise restraint to allow for productive diplomatic discussions. We are not going to get ahead of those discussions. We fully support Kuwait mediation”.

Earlier this week, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson insisted that Qatar’s neighbors provide a list of demands that was “reasonable and actionable”. He had also called for compromise and hosted senior Gulf officials, but efforts were undermined by President Trump who apparently supported Riyadh’s position.

Saudi Arabia had demanded Qatar to shut down Al Jazeera network, close Turkish military base and scale down ties with Iran. Qatar was also asked to cut ties with Muslim Brotherhood and other groups including Hezbollah, al-Qaeda and IS.

The Saudi Arabia led block also asked Qatar to stop all means of funding for individuals, groups or organizations that have been designated as terrorists by Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Bahrain, US and other countries.

Qatar must also refuse to naturalize citizens from the four countries and “revoke Qatari citizenship for existing nationals where such citizenship violates those countries’ laws”. Qatar should also hand over “terrorist figures”, fugitives and wanted individuals from Saudi Arabia led bloc to their countries of origin, freeze their assets and provide any desired information about their residency, movements and finances. They also asked Qatar to cease contact with the political opposition in these countries.

Demand of severing ties with Iran was explained in detail. Doha was asked to shut down  its diplomatic posts in Iran, expel any members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and conduct trade and commerce in accordance with the US and international sanctions in manner that does not “jeopardize the security” of the GCC member countries.

The desired media clampdown was not targeted at Al-Jazeera only. Al Jazeera’s affiliates and other news outlets including Arabi21, Rassd, Al-Araby Al-Jadeed and Middle East Eye were also asked to be close down.

Doha was also asked to “align Qatar’s military, political, social and economic policies with other Gulf and Arab countries, as well as on economic matters, as per 2014 agreement reached with Saudi Arabia”.

Another demand, which could have been quite costly for Qatar, says to “pay reparations and compensation for loss of lives and other financial losses caused by Qatar’s policies in the recent years. The sum will be determined in coordination with Qatar”.

They asked Qatar to agree to all demands within ten days of list being submitted, or the list will become invalid. Qatar must consent to monthly compliance audits in the first year after agreeing, followed by quarterly audits in the second year and annual audits in the following ten years.

The situation may deteriorate in case of Qatar’s non-compliance. UAE Ambassador to Russia Omar Ghobash, during an interview last week said that Qatar could face fresh sanctions by Gulf States asking their trading partners to choose between them or with Doha. Commercial bankers in the region believe that Saudi, Emirati and Bahraini banks might receive official guidance to pull deposits and interbank loans from Qatar.

However UAE’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Anwar Gargash has played down the chances of escalation saying “the alternative is not escalation but parting ways” from the six-member GCC.

On the other hand Qatar’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammad bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani , while speaking in Washington last week, said the GCC was set up to guard against external threats. “When the threat is coming from inside the GCC, there is a suspicion about the sustainability of the organization.”

Following the severing of diplomatic ties by Saudi led bloc and delinking ground and air routes with Qatar, Iran and Turkey have started supplying food items, water and other necessities and welcomed Qatar Airways to use their skies.

In one of his tweets, Saudi Arabia’s representative in UN Abdullah bin-Yahya al-Moallemi said: “Qatar had insisted on shaking the security of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and interfering in the affairs of countries in the region.”

Saudi Arabian forces have been assisting Bahrain in controlling opposition protests demanding their basic rights. Riyadh is also heading a coalition with started war against Yemen, currently under Houthis control. Qatar was also alleged by Riyadh to have ties with Yemen’s Ansarullah, the militia force of the Houthis fighting against Saudi hegemonic war. The ousted President Mansour al-Hadi led government in exile is based in Riyadh for more than a year.

Kuwait, working for mediating in the crisis and Oman have not followed Saudi Arabia’s diktat for severing relations with Qatar. Among the GCC countries, Oman and Kuwait have better ties with Tehran than other GCC member countries. Diplomatic ties between Saudi Arabia and Iran were severed after violent protest at Saudi embassy in Tehran in the aftermath of stampede tragedy in Mina, during Haj 2015. Some 465 Iranians were among those killed out of more than 1400 casualties. However Saudi Arabia admitted the death of 769 only. Others remain missing till date. More than 100 Indians were killed while 280 remained missing.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Salwan Momika, who burnt Quran in 2023, shot dead in Sweden

The controversy surrounding Momika extended beyond the immediate reactions to his acts. His actions sparked a broader debate regarding freedom of speech, religious tolerance, and the potential for such acts to incite hatred and violence.

Published

on

Salwan Momika, a 38-year-old Iraqi immigrant residing in Sweden, became a controversial figure in 2023 due to his repeated public burning of the Quran. These actions, filmed and widely circulated online, ignited fierce condemnation and protests across the Muslim world. He has been shot dead in Sweden, according to reports.

The desecration of Islam’s holy book prompted outrage and unrest in numerous countries, with demonstrations ranging from peaceful protests to violent riots. Governments and religious leaders issued strong statements of disapproval, highlighting the deeply offensive nature of Momika’s actions to billions of Muslims globally.

The controversy surrounding Momika extended beyond the immediate reactions to his acts. His actions sparked a broader debate regarding freedom of speech, religious tolerance, and the potential for such acts to incite hatred and violence.

While Sweden, like many Western democracies, upholds freedom of expression as a fundamental right, the line between this right and the potential for incitement to hatred and violence remains a complex and contentious issue. Critics argued that Momika’s actions crossed this line, deliberately provoking religious sensibilities and contributing to a climate of hostility. Conversely, proponents of his right to protest emphasized the importance of protecting free speech, even when the content is deeply offensive to others.

At the time of his death, Momika was awaiting a court ruling on charges of inciting ethnic hatred. This legal case further highlighted the complex legal and ethical ramifications of his actions. The Swedish judicial system was tasked with navigating the delicate balance between safeguarding free speech and preventing incitement to violence.

The outcome of the trial, which was ultimately postponed following his death, would have had significant implications for the interpretation and application of hate speech laws in Sweden and potentially beyond.

The shooting death of Salwan Momika adds another layer to this already complex and controversial situation. While the circumstances surrounding his death remain under investigation, it is undeniably a significant event with potential ramifications for the ongoing debate surrounding freedom of speech, religious sensitivities, and the prevention of religiously motivated violence.

The incident highlights the volatile nature of the issues at stake and the ongoing challenges in balancing individual rights with the need for social harmony and respect for different religious beliefs.

Continue Reading

India News

ChatGPT outage affects thousands of users globally, OpenAI reacts

OpenAI swiftly acknowledged the outage, publishing updates on their dedicated status page. This transparency, while offering little in the way of immediate solutions, served to reassure users that the company was actively addressing the situation.

Published

on

On January 23, OpenAI’s popular AI chatbot, ChatGPT, suffered a significant global outage, leaving millions of users unable to access the service. The disruption affected multiple access points, including the web interface, the mobile application, and even integrations on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). This widespread failure quickly drew significant attention, with reports flooding in from users worldwide.

The outage tracking website, Downdetector, registered a surge in user reports, exceeding a thousand complaints within a short period. This volume underscored the scale of the disruption and the significant impact on ChatGPT’s user base.

The majority of these reports indicated a complete inability to use the chatbot, highlighting the severity of the problem. A smaller percentage of users reported encountering difficulties with the website or API, suggesting a less comprehensive but still noticeable impact.

OpenAI swiftly acknowledged the outage, publishing updates on their dedicated status page. This transparency, while offering little in the way of immediate solutions, served to reassure users that the company was actively addressing the situation.

The official statements consistently described the problem as “degraded performance” and “elevated error rates” within the API, hinting at underlying technical issues that required investigation. However, specific details regarding the root cause remained undisclosed, pending a more thorough examination.

According to reports, the outage commenced around 5 PM IST and persisted for several hours. The lack of a definitive timeline and the ongoing nature of the disruption underlined the complexity of the problem and the challenges faced by OpenAI’s engineering teams in resolving the issue.

As of the latest updates, the exact cause of the outage remains under investigation by OpenAI. The company is actively working to restore full functionality and provide a more comprehensive explanation once the underlying problem has been identified and rectified.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Prince Harry, Rupert Murdoch’s UK group reach settlement in surveillance case

The relentless media attention, he has claimed, also contributed to the intense pressure that led him and his wife, Meghan Markle, to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States in 2020.

Published

on

Prince Harry has reached a settlement with Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers (NGN), bringing an abrupt end to a high-profile lawsuit alleging widespread phone hacking and unlawful surveillance.

The settlement, announced just as the trial was about to commence, includes substantial financial compensation for the Duke of Sussex and a formal, unequivocal apology from NGN. This marks a significant victory for Harry, who had accused the media giant of years of intrusive and illegal activities targeting his private life.

The apology, issued directly to Harry’s legal team, explicitly acknowledged the serious breach of privacy inflicted by both The Sun and the defunct News of the World. It detailed unlawful actions perpetrated between 1996 and 2011, including phone hacking, surveillance, and the use of private investigators to obtain sensitive information.

The statement specifically addressed the intrusive activities carried out by private investigators employed by The Sun, emphasizing the severity of the intrusion into Harry’s private life during his formative years. The apology extended to the distress caused to his late mother, Princess Diana, highlighting the impact of the media’s actions on the young prince.

This settlement represents one of three lawsuits filed by Harry against British media outlets, all stemming from accusations of privacy violations. He has consistently blamed the media for the relentless pursuit of his mother, Princess Diana, ultimately leading to her tragic death in a car crash in Paris while being chased by paparazzi.

The relentless media attention, he has claimed, also contributed to the intense pressure that led him and his wife, Meghan Markle, to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States in 2020.

The case underscores the wider issue of phone hacking and media intrusion, exemplified by the notorious scandal that forced the closure of News of the World in 2011. The hacking of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler’s phone, during the police investigation into her disappearance, remains a particularly egregious example of the unethical practices employed by some sections of the British press.

Harry’s legal battle has brought renewed focus to this issue and the need for greater accountability within the media industry. The settlement, while ending this particular legal chapter, leaves a lasting legacy concerning media responsibility and the rights of public figures to privacy.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com

Left Menu Icon