English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

UN condemns “excessive” Israeli force against Palestinians

Published

on

UN condemns “excessive” Israeli force against Palestinians

The UN General Assembly has condemned Israel for excessive use of force against Palestinian civilians, in a resolution adopted by a strong majority of 120 countries on Wednesday.

According to reports, the 193-member world body rejected the United States’ efforts to blame Gaza’s Hamas rulers for the violence that has killed over 120 Palestinians in the past two and half months.  The resolution deplores Israel’s use of “excessive, disproportionate and indiscriminate force” against Palestinians.

Presented by Algeria and Turkey on behalf of Arab and Muslim countries, the measure won a decisive 120 votes, with eight votes against and 45 abstentions. The UNGA resolutions are not legally binding but carry political weight.

The resolution, which came weeks after US vetoed a similar resolution at UNSC, was opposed by Israel, US, Australia, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Solomon Islands and Togo.

According to Aljazeera, at least 129 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces in Gaza border protests since March 30 to commemorate 70 years since the Nakba (or Catastrophe), when about 750,000 Palestinians were driven out from their homes. The protests are part of the “Right to return” campaign.

UN condemns “excessive” Israeli force against PalestiniansMay 14, the day when US moved its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, witnessed the  largest number of deaths. Palestinians and their supporters said most protesters were unarmed civilians and Israel used excessive force against them.

Palestinian UN envoy Riyad Mansour told the General Assembly before the vote,”We need protection of our civilian population,”  and the resolution was “intended to contribute to a de-escalation of the volatile situation. We cannot remain silent in the face of the most violent crimes and human rights violations being systematically perpetrated against our people.”

Israel claims that many of the Palestinian protesters were armed and that the Israeli army was defending itself against attacks on the border fence with Gaza. US has maintained Israel’s right to defend itself.

The UN General Assembly resolution also asked UN chief Antonio Guterres to report back within 60 days on proposals “on ways and means for ensuring the safety, protection and well-being of the Palestinian civilian population under Israeli occupation, including … recommendations regarding an international protection mechanism.”

Meanwhile, the US Ambassador Nikki Haley has dismissed the resolution as “one-sided” and accused Arab countries of trying to score political points at home by seeking to condemn Israel at the United Nations. “For some, attacking Israel is their favourite political sport. That’s why we are here today,” Haley told the Assembly.

An amendment presented by the US that condemned Hamas for “inciting violence” along the border with Gaza failed to garner the two-thirds majority needed for adoption.

In December last year 128 countries defied US President Donald Trump and voted in favour of a UN General Assembly resolution calling for the US to drop its recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. Several protests took place in various countries opposing US decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and relocation of its embassy to the holy city.

Latest world news

India denies commitment to tariff cuts after Trump’s claim

India has denied making any commitments to cutting tariffs on US imports, contradicting President Donald Trump’s claim that New Delhi agreed to lower duties.

Published

on

India has dismissed US President Donald Trump’s assertion that New Delhi agreed to reduce tariffs on American products. The clarification comes just days after Trump stated that India had decided to “cut their tariffs way down” following US pressure.

During a recent address, Trump expressed frustration over India’s trade policies, calling them “massively restrictive” and suggesting that New Delhi had been forced to lower tariffs due to US intervention.

“You can’t sell anything into India, it is almost restrictive,” Trump remarked. “They have agreed, by the way, they want to cut their tariffs way down now because somebody is finally exposing them for what they have done.”

However, the Indian government has categorically denied making any such commitments. A report from The Times of India states that Indian officials, while addressing a parliamentary panel, confirmed that no agreements had been made with the US regarding tariff reductions.

The government has reportedly sought time until September to address the concerns repeatedly raised by the American president. Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal clarified that discussions between both nations are aimed at securing a long-term, mutually beneficial trade agreement rather than focusing solely on immediate tariff adjustments.

The US remains a crucial trading partner for India, especially in the information technology and services sectors. Meanwhile, India has been a key buyer of American defense equipment, with billions of dollars worth of military hardware sales recorded in recent years.

Despite the tariff dispute, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump share a strong working relationship. Modi, who recently visited the White House, emphasized that both nations are working towards a comprehensive trade agreement expected to be finalized soon.

Trump is also expected to visit India later this year to attend the Quad summit, a strategic dialogue involving the US, India, Japan, and Australia. The meeting will further shape Indo-US ties, addressing economic and security concerns.

While trade negotiations continue, India’s latest clarification underscores that tariff adjustments remain a work in progress rather than a concluded deal.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Elon Musk claims Ukraine link in massive cyberattack on X

A large-scale cyberattack disrupted X services across multiple continents. Elon Musk claims the attack had digital footprints linked to Ukraine, but experts warn against premature attribution.

Published

on

Elon Musk

A massive cyberattack targeted X (formerly Twitter), causing widespread outages across Asia, Europe, and North America. The disruption began early Monday, with users unable to access the platform for extended periods. According to Downdetector, a website that tracks service disruptions, reports of inaccessibility surged, affecting thousands of users.

Musk suggests Ukrainian involvement

Elon Musk, in an interview with Fox News, alleged that the attack had digital traces linked to Ukraine. “We’re not sure exactly what happened, but there was a massive cyberattack to try to bring down the X system with IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area,” he stated.

Musk further supported his claim by sharing a post from an X account named DogeDesigner, which suggested the attack was part of a campaign against him. The post linked the cyberattack to recent protests against Musk’s leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and acts of vandalism at Tesla facilities.

Speculation over nation-state involvement

The billionaire speculated that the attack required “tremendous resources” and could be the work of a nation-state or a large, coordinated group. Speaking to Fox Business, he elaborated that the computers involved in the attack had digital footprints linked to Ukraine. However, cybersecurity experts warn that attributing attacks solely based on IP addresses is unreliable, as attackers often mask their locations to mislead investigations.

X faces continued technical struggles

During the peak of the outage, more than 40,000 users reported connectivity issues. While X worked to restore services, many users continued experiencing intermittent disruptions.

Since Musk’s $44 billion acquisition of Twitter in 2022, X has significantly reduced its workforce, leading to an increase in technical issues. Additionally, Musk’s decision to reinstate previously banned accounts, including those known for spreading conspiracy theories, has drawn criticism from advocacy groups.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

Pakistan cricket board faces criticism over absence at Champions Trophy 2025 final ceremony

The PCB is being criticized for not having a representative at the Champions Trophy 2025 final presentation. Shoaib Akhtar and former cricketers question the decision.

Published

on

Champions Trophy 2025 final

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is facing severe criticism for not having a single representative present during the Champions Trophy 2025 final presentation ceremony in Dubai. As India secured the title by defeating New Zealand by four wickets, the post-match podium was shared by International Cricket Council (ICC) chairman Jay Shah, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president Roger Binny, secretary Devajit Saikia, and New Zealand Cricket (NZC) director Roger Twose.

No PCB presence despite being the host nation

Notably, PCB chief operating officer Sumair Ahmed, who also served as the tournament director, was present in Dubai but was not invited onto the stage for the trophy presentation. According to a report by Telecom Asia Sport, PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi did not travel to Dubai due to his commitments as Pakistan’s interior minister. He had informed the ICC about his absence, citing his engagement in a joint parliamentary session in Islamabad, where President Asif Zardari was addressing the nation.

Shoaib Akhtar questions PCB’s absence

Former Pakistan fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar expressed his disappointment on social media over the PCB’s absence from the stage.

“India has won the ICC Champions Trophy today, but I noticed something strange. Pakistan were the hosts in the tournament, but there were no Pakistan Cricket Board representatives here (at the trophy presentation). This is beyond my understanding. Why was there no one to represent us and give the trophy? Please think about it; it’s a world stage, but sadly I could not see any PCB members. Feeling very down to see that,” said Akhtar in a video posted on X.

Speculations over PCB’s decision

Some former Pakistan cricketers have suggested that the absence of PCB officials at the ceremony could be misinterpreted in India, making it appear as though the PCB chairman avoided the event because of India’s triumph. This speculation has further fueled the controversy.

Pakistan’s poor campaign in its home tournament

The 2025 Champions Trophy was significant for Pakistan, as it was their first ICC event at home in 29 years. However, the hosts had a disappointing campaign, crashing out in the group stage after defeats to New Zealand and India.

While the ICC holds authority over selecting dignitaries for the podium, the exclusion of a PCB representative despite Sumair Ahmed’s presence has raised many eyebrows. The matter has sparked debate within Pakistan’s cricket fraternity, with many questioning the board’s decision-making in such a high-profile global event.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com