English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

US trade court strikes down Trump tariffs, says president overstepped constitutional powers

A Manhattan federal court has ruled that Donald Trump’s sweeping import tariffs exceeded presidential authority, stressing that only Congress can regulate foreign trade.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A US federal court has halted former President Donald Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the executive exceeded his constitutional authority by attempting to unilaterally impose broad import duties under emergency powers.

The ruling, issued by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade, underscores that the US Constitution vests Congress with exclusive rights to regulate trade with foreign nations—a power not transferable to the President through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), even during national emergencies.

Court finds misuse of emergency powers

In its unanimous decision, the three-judge panel concluded that the IEEPA does not grant the President unrestricted powers to levy tariffs. It emphasized that any attempt to interpret the law as authorizing such broad action would be unconstitutional, warning against an “improper abdication of legislative power.”

“The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President’s use of tariffs… [it] is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because federal law does not allow it,” the ruling noted.

India-Pakistan ceasefire claim fails to convince

Trump administration lawyers had argued that the tariff powers were necessary to navigate complex international negotiations. They even suggested that tariff threats had helped facilitate a temporary ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May, following a terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam region on April 22.

However, the court dismissed these arguments, stating that the IEEPA was never intended to support such expansive trade strategies. Officials had claimed ongoing tariff talks with various countries were at a sensitive juncture, with a July 7 deadline looming, but this too failed to sway the bench.

Tariffs shocked markets, drew multiple lawsuits

The controversial tariffs, announced on April 2, targeted US trade partners with a 10% baseline, rising sharply for nations like China and the EU with significant trade surpluses against the US. The move rattled financial markets, prompting the Trump administration to pause or soften several measures within days.

By May 12, both Washington and Beijing had agreed to ease tariffs for a 90-day window as part of broader trade talks. Still, the legal battles mounted, with lawsuits filed by 13 states and small businesses contending that the tariffs were economically damaging and legally unjustified. At least five other challenges remain pending.

Trump team appeals ruling

Immediately after the decision, the Trump administration filed a notice of appeal. While official responses were limited, Trump advisor Stephen Miller reacted sharply on social media, calling the verdict part of a “judicial coup.”

The court’s ruling is a critical setback for Trump’s use of trade policy as a diplomatic and economic tool and sets a precedent reinforcing the role of Congress in regulating international commerce.

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace plan as tensions rise, Tehran signals military readiness

Trump rejects Iran’s peace plan, keeping focus on nuclear concerns as Tehran signals readiness and tensions continue to rise.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Iran aimed at easing ongoing tensions, signaling a continued deadlock between the two countries.

The proposal reportedly included steps linked to easing restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route. However, the United States declined the offer, maintaining that any agreement must address concerns related to Iran’s nuclear programme.

Washington has made it clear that resolving nuclear issues remains a priority and that partial measures without broader commitments will not be accepted.

Nuclear issue remains central

The U.S. position continues to focus on preventing Iran from advancing its nuclear capabilities. Officials believe that without a comprehensive agreement, temporary arrangements could delay a long-term resolution.

The rejection of the proposal indicates that negotiations remain stalled, with both sides holding firm on key demands.

Iran issues warning

Following the rejection, Iranian officials have issued strong statements, indicating readiness to respond if pressure from the U.S. continues.

Reports suggest that Iran has asserted its military preparedness, warning that any escalation could lead to serious consequences. The remarks reflect growing tensions as diplomatic efforts struggle to produce results.

Rising geopolitical tension

The situation remains volatile, with both countries engaged in a prolonged standoff. Measures such as restrictions on trade routes and strategic pressure points continue to impact the broader region.

The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical factor in the conflict, given its importance for global energy supplies.

Outlook uncertain

With no immediate breakthrough in sight, tensions between the United States and Iran are expected to persist. The lack of agreement on key issues, particularly the nuclear programme, continues to hinder progress toward de-escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com