English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

US trade court strikes down Trump tariffs, says president overstepped constitutional powers

A Manhattan federal court has ruled that Donald Trump’s sweeping import tariffs exceeded presidential authority, stressing that only Congress can regulate foreign trade.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A US federal court has halted former President Donald Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the executive exceeded his constitutional authority by attempting to unilaterally impose broad import duties under emergency powers.

The ruling, issued by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade, underscores that the US Constitution vests Congress with exclusive rights to regulate trade with foreign nations—a power not transferable to the President through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), even during national emergencies.

Court finds misuse of emergency powers

In its unanimous decision, the three-judge panel concluded that the IEEPA does not grant the President unrestricted powers to levy tariffs. It emphasized that any attempt to interpret the law as authorizing such broad action would be unconstitutional, warning against an “improper abdication of legislative power.”

“The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President’s use of tariffs… [it] is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because federal law does not allow it,” the ruling noted.

India-Pakistan ceasefire claim fails to convince

Trump administration lawyers had argued that the tariff powers were necessary to navigate complex international negotiations. They even suggested that tariff threats had helped facilitate a temporary ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May, following a terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam region on April 22.

However, the court dismissed these arguments, stating that the IEEPA was never intended to support such expansive trade strategies. Officials had claimed ongoing tariff talks with various countries were at a sensitive juncture, with a July 7 deadline looming, but this too failed to sway the bench.

Tariffs shocked markets, drew multiple lawsuits

The controversial tariffs, announced on April 2, targeted US trade partners with a 10% baseline, rising sharply for nations like China and the EU with significant trade surpluses against the US. The move rattled financial markets, prompting the Trump administration to pause or soften several measures within days.

By May 12, both Washington and Beijing had agreed to ease tariffs for a 90-day window as part of broader trade talks. Still, the legal battles mounted, with lawsuits filed by 13 states and small businesses contending that the tariffs were economically damaging and legally unjustified. At least five other challenges remain pending.

Trump team appeals ruling

Immediately after the decision, the Trump administration filed a notice of appeal. While official responses were limited, Trump advisor Stephen Miller reacted sharply on social media, calling the verdict part of a “judicial coup.”

The court’s ruling is a critical setback for Trump’s use of trade policy as a diplomatic and economic tool and sets a precedent reinforcing the role of Congress in regulating international commerce.

Latest world news

Trump says Iran agrees to never have nuclear weapons, rejects $300 billion fund claim

Donald Trump said Iran has agreed to never possess nuclear weapons under a proposed framework, while dismissing reports that the US would provide Tehran with a $300 billion reconstruction fund.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump has said that Iran has agreed to a commitment that it will never develop or possess nuclear weapons, describing it as a central element of a proposed understanding between Washington and Tehran.

Speaking about the ongoing diplomatic efforts, Trump also rejected reports suggesting that the United States planned to provide Iran with a reconstruction or investment package worth $300 billion. He described such claims as false and said no such arrangement had been agreed.

The remarks come as discussions continue over a broader framework aimed at easing tensions between the two countries. According to Trump, the understanding would ensure that Iran remains without nuclear weapons while opening the door for future engagement if the terms are respected.

Questions remain over final agreement details

Despite Trump’s comments, several aspects of the proposed arrangement remain unclear because the full text of the agreement has not yet been made public.

Reports indicate that negotiations have involved discussions on sanctions relief, access to frozen assets and potential economic measures linked to Iran’s compliance with future commitments. However, the exact scope of these provisions has not been officially confirmed.

Another key issue is how compliance would be monitored. Details regarding inspections, verification mechanisms and the handling of Iran’s existing nuclear materials have yet to be fully explained.

Further negotiations expected

Officials have suggested that discussions on technical nuclear matters could continue even after the signing of an initial memorandum of understanding. Such talks would likely focus on implementation and verification measures.

The proposed framework is being closely watched internationally, as any agreement between the United States and Iran could have significant implications for regional stability and global non-proliferation efforts.

For now, Trump has maintained that the core objective remains clear: ensuring that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon while denying reports that Washington has committed to a multibillion-dollar reconstruction fund.

Continue Reading

LATEST SPORTS NEWS

USA start FIFA World Cup 2026 with dominant 4-1 victory over Paraguay

The USA opened their FIFA World Cup 2026 journey with a dominant 4-1 victory against Paraguay, earning three valuable points in Group D.

Published

on

The United States kicked off their FIFA World Cup 2026 campaign in impressive fashion, securing a commanding 4-1 victory over Paraguay in their Group D opener at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles.

Playing in front of a passionate home crowd, the hosts delivered an attacking display to collect all three points and make an early statement in the tournament. The match also marked a significant occasion as the USA hosted part of the World Cup opening festivities before turning attention to the action on the pitch.

The Americans took control early and maintained pressure on Paraguay throughout the contest. Their attacking movement and clinical finishing helped them establish a comfortable lead, while Paraguay struggled to contain the hosts’ pace and creativity in the final third.

USA seize control after fast start

The United States settled quickly and found success going forward, creating several opportunities through quick passing and aggressive pressing. Their attacking approach paid off as they built momentum and gradually stretched Paraguay’s defence.

Paraguay attempted to respond and managed to get on the scoresheet, but the South American side found it difficult to match the intensity shown by the hosts. The USA continued to create chances and added further goals to put the result beyond doubt.

With the victory, the United States moved to the top section of Group D and gained an important boost in confidence ahead of their upcoming fixtures in the tournament.

Strong opening result for hosts

A winning start is particularly important in a World Cup campaign, and the USA achieved exactly that with a comprehensive performance. The result gives the hosts valuable momentum as they prepare for the next stage of group play.

For Paraguay, the defeat means they will need a strong response in their remaining group matches to keep their hopes of progressing to the knockout rounds alive.

The FIFA World Cup 2026 is being jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, with the tournament featuring an expanded format and more participating teams than previous editions.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Jaishankar raises deaths of three Indian sailors with Marco Rubio, lodges strong protest

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar conveyed India’s strong protest to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio over an attack that killed three Indian sailors, stressing that lethal action against commercial shipping is unjustified.

Published

on

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Saturday spoke with Marco Rubio and conveyed India’s strong protest over recent attacks on commercial vessels in the Gulf that resulted in the deaths of three Indian sailors.

According to reports, Jaishankar told Rubio that the use of lethal force against commercial shipping was not justified and underlined India’s serious concerns regarding the safety of civilian seafarers operating in the region. The conversation came days after three Indian mariners were killed in an attack on the Palau-flagged tanker Settebello near the Oman coast.

The incident has triggered diplomatic engagement between New Delhi and Washington. India had earlier summoned a senior US diplomat to register its concerns and seek accountability following the attack. The Ministry of External Affairs has emphasized that actions endangering civilian shipping undermine maritime safety and stability in a strategically important region.

India reiterates concern over maritime safety

India has stressed the importance of protecting civilian seafarers and ensuring the security of international maritime commerce. Officials have expressed concern over multiple incidents involving Indian crew members in West Asian waters in recent days.

The deaths of the three sailors have also sparked calls within India for stronger diplomatic efforts to safeguard Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in conflict-affected maritime zones.

Background of the incident

The attack involved the tanker Settebello, which was operating near Oman when it was struck during ongoing tensions linked to the conflict involving Iran and maritime operations in the Gulf region. Initial reports indicated that Indian crew members were among those affected, and later confirmations established that three Indian sailors had died in the incident.

India has maintained that civilian shipping should not become a target and has continued diplomatic outreach to ensure the safety and welfare of Indian seafarers working across global shipping routes.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com