English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

US withdraws from UN Human Rights Council, Supports Israel

Published

on

US withdraws from UN Human Rights Council, Supports Israel

Nikki Haley announces calling world body as “chronic bias against Israel”

Continuing isolationist moves the US administration has withdrawn from the Geneva based United Nations’ Human Rights Council accusing it of being a “chronic bias against Israel”. Washington’s move triggered criticism by human rights groups while several world leaders described it regrettable.

Nikki Haley, US ambassador to UN announced the decision to pull out of the UN Human Rights Council on Tuesday. She said, “We take this step because our commitment does not allow us to remain a part of a hypocritical and self-serving organisation that makes a mockery of human rights.” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was standing beside her during the announcement.

Haley criticised Russia, China and Egypt for thwarting US efforts to reform the council. She did not spare even the countries which shared US values and encouraged Washington to remain but “were unwilling to seriously challenge the status quo.”

“Look at the council membership, and you see an appalling disrespect for the most basic rights,” she said Haley, citing Venezuela, China, Cuba and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

She also said the “disproportionate focus and unending hostility toward Israel is clear proof that the council is motivated by political bias, not by human rights.”

Reacting to the US decision, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, the UN high commissioner for human rights, called it “disappointing, if not really surprising”.  He further said , “Given the state of human rights in today’s world, the US should be stepping up, not stepping back.”

US withdraws from UN Human Rights Council, Supports Israel

The European Union said the move “risks undermining the role of the US as a champion and supporter of democracy on the world stage”, while British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson called it “regrettable”.

Read More: US Face Worldwide Condemnation for Embassy Relocation

It was appreciated by Israel, a major ally of the US, calling it a “courageous” move. The UN Human Rights Council voted last month to probe the killing of scores of Palestinian protesters in the Gaza Strip accusing Israel of excessive use of force.

The US exit from the 47-member Geneva-based body did not come as a shock, as Haley had talked about it almost from the moment she became the US ambassador to the UN in early 2017.

Commenting on the US Ambassador Nikki Haley’s announcement, Aljazeera’s Washington based reporter Rosiland Jordan said, “She was quite adamant at the time that the council held a very deep anti-Israel bias and that the US was going to try to root it out; otherwise it would leave the council.”

“But the primary reason why the US is pulling out of the council now is because of its efforts to reduce or eliminate of the unfair criticism, in the US’ view, of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians,” she added.

Read More: Isolated Trump gets Saudi Arabia, Israel support on Iran deal withdrawal

In their remarks, both Haley and Pompeo said the decision had been made after a long year of efforts to shame the council into reform.

On Monday, UNHRC’s chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein called on Washington to halt its child separation policy from their immigrant parents at the US-Mexico border. He said, “The thought that any state would seek to deter parents by inflicting such abuse on children is unconscionable.”

US President Donald Trump administration move of withdrawing from UNHRC is the latest US rejection of multilateral engagement after it pulled out of the Paris climate agreement and the Iran nuclear deal.

The US move has attracted criticism from a wide range of organisations at home and abroad.  Jamil Dakwar, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Human Rights Program, said Trump’s “misguided policy of isolationism only harms American interests.”

Read More: Mike Pompeo visits Saudi Arabia, Israel and Jordan

Human Rights First, Save the Children and CARE, had earlier warned Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that the US withdrawal would “make it more difficult to advance human rights priorities and aid victims of abuse around the world.”

The US’ move is unprecedented in the 12-year history of the council because no country has ever dropped out voluntarily. Libya’s membership was suspended in 2011 after Tripoli’s crackdown on protesters.

The council’s 47 members are elected by the UN’s General Assembly for a three-year period, and can only serve for two terms in a row. A specific number of seats are allocated for each region of the globe.

Washington is halfway through a three year term and Trump administration had long threatened to quit if it was not overhauled. Under President Barack Obama the US was elected to the UN human rights top body for the maximum two consecutive terms. After a year off, it was re-elected in 2016.

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace plan as tensions rise, Tehran signals military readiness

Trump rejects Iran’s peace plan, keeping focus on nuclear concerns as Tehran signals readiness and tensions continue to rise.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Iran aimed at easing ongoing tensions, signaling a continued deadlock between the two countries.

The proposal reportedly included steps linked to easing restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route. However, the United States declined the offer, maintaining that any agreement must address concerns related to Iran’s nuclear programme.

Washington has made it clear that resolving nuclear issues remains a priority and that partial measures without broader commitments will not be accepted.

Nuclear issue remains central

The U.S. position continues to focus on preventing Iran from advancing its nuclear capabilities. Officials believe that without a comprehensive agreement, temporary arrangements could delay a long-term resolution.

The rejection of the proposal indicates that negotiations remain stalled, with both sides holding firm on key demands.

Iran issues warning

Following the rejection, Iranian officials have issued strong statements, indicating readiness to respond if pressure from the U.S. continues.

Reports suggest that Iran has asserted its military preparedness, warning that any escalation could lead to serious consequences. The remarks reflect growing tensions as diplomatic efforts struggle to produce results.

Rising geopolitical tension

The situation remains volatile, with both countries engaged in a prolonged standoff. Measures such as restrictions on trade routes and strategic pressure points continue to impact the broader region.

The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical factor in the conflict, given its importance for global energy supplies.

Outlook uncertain

With no immediate breakthrough in sight, tensions between the United States and Iran are expected to persist. The lack of agreement on key issues, particularly the nuclear programme, continues to hinder progress toward de-escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com