English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

World Leaders and Cyber Security

Published

on

World Leaders and Cyber Security

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]There is reason to be cautious, whether you are in India, or in the US—Modi or Trump

By Sujit Bhar

Eric Geller, an American cyber security reporter, reiterates in Politico that the Android phone that US President Donald Trump uses could be a cyber security threat for the White House and even for those inside the administration. Trump has been given a super secure, encrypted phone by his security aides and Geller quotes a New York Times report which said Trump keeps using “his old, unsecured Android phone, to the protests of some of his aides”.

He lays out two troubling issues. First, Trump reportedly uses a 2012 Samsung Galaxy S3, that “no longer receives software updates from their manufacturers or wireless carriers”. Which, in turn, means that it is open to security threats. Secondly, he points out that while Google’s Android technology offers many more options to the user than an Apple iPhone does, it is hardly secure. The Apple encryption, on the other hand, is so secure that even the FBI has reported that it can’t break through.

So what are the problems? Geller talks about a research that found “one of the most dangerous Android vulnerabilities, the so-called Stagefright bug, which lets hackers take control of a phone using only a text message.”

Now that is scary. Geller talked to Matthew Green, a computer science professor at Johns Hopkins University, who said: “It’s just crazy that the president is interacting with such an out-of-date and likely insecure device.” This was echoed by Bruce Schneier a leading cyber security expert, who told Politico: “His (Trump’s) off-the-shelf Android could potentially become a room bug without his knowledge. An attacker could certainly hijack his apps.”

The question is whether Trump uses this phone to discuss state secrets, in which case somebody can easily snoop. If he texts from this phone, it possible that somebody (outside the administration) can read it. And since Trump is a Twitter-bug, a quick entry point is provided to the hackers through this.

This was made evident in India through hackers who call themselves ‘Legion’; they had hacked into the email databases of some top journalists. That would be chicken feed if top hackers of the world manage to plant a Trojan-type bug into Trump’s phone and then start listening.

Technically, Trump’s using his personal Andriod phone for official purposes would be akin to Hillary Clinton using her personal email to transfer important state documents; an issue Trump has never stopped harping on.

Okay, there is this knowledge that Trump actually is less of a cyber guy and uses paper from a small notepad to scribble instructions. That, though, remains in the realm of uncertainty.

Epiphany time

What this has done is that it has enlightened the pubic on the risks of existing in an insecure cyber atmosphere. India has taken this seriously too. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been seen with a number of phones, and there is curiosity as to which brand his phone actually is. But he has also been seen with an iPhone, and this probably is because of its security features.

It is possible to secure an Android phone to only that extent. The intrinsic security structure of an iPhone has been upgraded to a very high level. So Modi, who is also a bit of a Twitter-bug will be secure while doing so.

India is trying to get its act together as far as cyber security is concerned.

According to the site SecurityIntelligence there is major work on to bring India on a par with international security standards. India is set to introduce freshly minted encryption and privacy policies and will move to amend the existing laws that mostly fail to address international systems, and link with international law-enforcers.

To start with, Indian has appointed a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). At this point there is no national agency that can assess India’s cyber security threats and weave responses. This is in the discussion stage, but things are moving fast. However, top level officers and the Prime Minister cannot wait for a system to be in place before securing national secrets and himself.

During Modi’s trip to the US in the Barack Obama regime, he had talks with the Americans regarding US-India Cyber Relationship Framework which will lead to legal frameworks as well as proper mechanisms for implementation. This has not, yet, translated into a treaty.

India has cyber security deals with Malaysia and the European Union and more countries would soon come into this ambit.

India is in a position to secure top government offices with alacrity, because India can afford to leapfrog the preliminary stages of development of a security system and directly adopt one that has worked so far.

This is also relevant to commerce and industry. A report, “2016 Cost of Data Breach Study: India” said such cost increased 9.5 percent for each Indian company, with 41 percent of all Indian companies experiencing such data breach. This could be disastrous in the software and the pharmaceutical industries, which are India’s Intellectual Property strengths at this point of time.

Maybe Modi understands the threats a little more than Trump. There is reason to be cautious, whether you are in India, or in the US. Every level of citizenry is under a threat perception, probably for the first time in history.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

US strikes Iranian missile sites near Hormuz with 5,000-pound bunker buster bombs

US forces hit Iranian missile positions near the Strait of Hormuz using deep penetrator bombs to counter threats to global shipping.

Published

on

In a major escalation aimed at restoring maritime movement, the United States has carried out airstrikes on Iranian missile positions near the Strait of Hormuz using powerful deep-penetration bombs.

The US military confirmed that multiple 5,000-pound bunker buster munitions were used to target hardened missile infrastructure along Iran’s coastline. According to an official statement, the sites housed anti-ship cruise missiles that posed a significant threat to international shipping in the strategic waterway.

The strikes mark the first major US military action to reopen the Strait of Hormuz after Iran reportedly shut it down in response to the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Israel.

Strait disruption triggers global concern

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global النفط transit route, with nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil supply passing through it. Its closure has severely disrupted shipping activity and triggered a sharp rise in global energy prices.

The US action appears to be aimed at neutralising immediate threats to vessels and restoring safe passage through the region.

Allies reluctant to back US move

The development comes amid reports that several US allies, including NATO members, have declined calls from President Donald Trump to support efforts to secure the strait.

Expressing frustration, Trump criticised allies for not contributing even limited resources such as minesweepers, despite longstanding US support to NATO. He maintained that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remains a priority for global security.

However, Iran has consistently denied pursuing nuclear weapons, stating that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes, including energy production.

Use of bunker buster bombs

The bombs used in the operation are designed to destroy fortified or deeply buried targets. These 5,000-pound munitions, often referred to as bunker busters, are capable of penetrating hardened structures before detonation.

While powerful, they are smaller compared to the 30,000-pound bombs reportedly used by the US in previous strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Top US counterterrorism official resigns over Iran war, cites conscience

Joseph Kent steps down as US counterterrorism chief, questioning the justification for the Iran war and citing moral concerns.

Published

on

Trump official resigns

A senior US national security official has stepped down in protest against the ongoing war with Iran, citing moral concerns and disagreement with the administration’s decision.

Joseph Kent, who headed the National Counterterrorism Center, resigned from his post, stating he could not support the conflict “in good conscience.” In his resignation letter, Kent argued that Iran did not pose an “imminent threat” to the United States.

He also alleged that external pressure, particularly from Israel and influential pro-war voices, played a role in shaping the decision to enter the conflict under President Donald Trump.

“I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” Kent wrote, adding that the US had been drawn into the conflict despite a lack of direct threat.

Kent further claimed that a “misinformation campaign” by senior Israeli officials and sections of the American media contributed to building support for military action. According to him, this created an “echo chamber” that influenced the president’s perception of Iran as an immediate danger.

In his letter, Kent said that until mid-2025, Trump had acknowledged that prolonged wars in the Middle East had drained US resources and cost lives. However, he suggested that this position shifted under sustained pressure and messaging.

He urged the president to reconsider the course of action, warning that the conflict could push the country toward instability. “You can reverse course and chart a new path for our nation, or allow us to slip further toward decline and chaos,” he wrote.

Kent’s resignation marks the first high-level departure from the administration directly linked to the Iran war.

As head of the National Counterterrorism Center, Kent was responsible for analysing and monitoring terrorist threats. His tenure, however, had been controversial. He was confirmed to the role last year by a narrow Senate vote, facing strong opposition from Democrats over his past associations.

Critics had raised concerns about his links to far-right figures and his stance on conspiracy theories. During his earlier political campaign, Kent had professional associations with individuals connected to extremist groups, which became a point of contention during his confirmation hearings.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Fire near Dubai International Airport after drone incident, flights temporarily suspended

Flights at Dubai International Airport were temporarily suspended after a drone-related incident caused a fuel tank fire near the facility. Authorities confirmed the blaze was contained and no injuries were reported.

Published

on

Fire at Dubai international airport

A fire broke out near Dubai International Airport on Monday after a drone-related incident struck a fuel tank in the surrounding area, prompting authorities to suspend flights temporarily while emergency teams responded.

Officials said crews from Dubai Civil Defence were quickly deployed to control the blaze after the incident was reported near the airport. Authorities confirmed that no injuries were recorded and that safety protocols were immediately activated in the surrounding area.

The Dubai Media Office said in a post on X that a drone incident near the airport had affected one of the fuel tanks. Emergency teams moved rapidly to bring the fire under control.

Later, officials confirmed that the situation had been contained. According to authorities, civil defence teams successfully controlled the fire resulting from the impact on the fuel facility, and there were no casualties.

Authorities said response teams acted quickly while precautionary safety measures were implemented to safeguard residents, workers and airport operations in the area.

Flights temporarily suspended as precaution

Following the incident, the Dubai Civil Aviation Authority announced a temporary suspension of flights at Dubai International Airport to ensure passenger and staff safety.

Travellers were advised to contact their respective airlines for updated flight schedules as authorities assessed the situation and continued response operations.

Airport officials also confirmed that some flights were diverted to Al Maktoum International Airport during the temporary suspension.

Rising security concerns amid regional conflict

The incident comes amid heightened tensions in the region. Officials said Iran has fired more than 1,800 missiles and drones toward the United Arab Emirates since the start of the ongoing Middle East conflict.

Authorities said the UAE has become one of the most targeted countries during the escalation, though most projectiles have reportedly been intercepted by air defence systems.

The strikes have targeted both military and civilian infrastructure, including airports, ports and oil facilities across the Gulf after US-Israeli strikes reportedly hit Iranian leadership targets.

Meanwhile, the UAE’s defence ministry has reported six deaths linked to the conflict so far — four civilians and two military personnel. Officials said the soldiers died in a helicopter crash caused by a technical issue.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com