English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Trump says India has been exposed on tariffs as he launches another attack

“India charges us massive tariffs. Massive. You can’t even sell anything in India,” Trump said. “They have agreed, by the way; they want to cut their tariffs way down now because somebody is finally exposing them for what they have done.”

Published

on

U.S. President Donald Trump launched a scathing critique of India’s tariff regime, calling it “next to impossible” to sell goods to India due to its “massive” import duties. However, he revealed that India has agreed to significantly reduce its tariffs, attributing the shift to increased scrutiny of its trade practices.

In a nationally televised address from the White House, Trump announced the introduction of reciprocal tariffs on countries imposing high levies on American goods, set to take effect on April 2. “India charges us massive tariffs. Massive. You can’t even sell anything in India,” Trump said. “They have agreed, by the way; they want to cut their tariffs way down now because somebody is finally exposing them for what they have done.”

The new policy marks a significant shift in U.S. trade strategy, with Trump vowing to no longer tolerate what he described as unfair trade practices by other nations. He criticized several countries, including Canada and the European Union, for imposing high tariffs on American goods and pledged to introduce reciprocal measures.

Trump specifically targeted Canada’s 250% tariff on U.S. dairy products, calling it “unfair” and vowing to impose equivalent tariffs unless Canada reduces its levies. “Canada has been ripping us off for years on tariffs for lumber and dairy products. Two hundred and fifty percent. Nobody ever talks about that. That’s not going to happen anymore,” he said.

He also accused the European Union of being a “terrible abuser” of the U.S., claiming the bloc was formed to take advantage of American markets.

Earlier in the week, during a speech to a joint session of Congress, Trump singled out India’s high tariffs on automobile imports, which he claimed exceed 100%. “India charges us auto tariffs higher than 100%. It’s very unfair,” he said, reiterating his commitment to rebalancing global trade relationships.

The introduction of reciprocal tariffs is expected to have far-reaching implications for global trade, forcing countries to reassess their tariff policies. Notably, the U.S. has already imposed 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico and an additional 10% on Chinese goods.

Amid the tensions, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expressed optimism about the future of India-U.S. trade relations. Speaking virtually at the India Today Conclave, Lutnick emphasized the need for India to open up its agricultural market while acknowledging the political sensitivities involved.

“The Indian market for agriculture has to open up. It can’t just stay closed. Now, how you do that and the scale by which you do that, maybe you do quotas, maybe you do limits. You can be smarter when you have your most important trading partner on the other side of the table,” Lutnick said.

He highlighted the importance of mutual understanding and cooperation, suggesting that India could adopt smarter strategies, such as quotas or limits, to facilitate trade. Lutnick also expressed confidence in the ongoing negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement, expected to be finalized by the fall of 2025.

During a recent meeting between President Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the two leaders committed to expanding trade and investment to strengthen their economies and create jobs. They set an ambitious goal, “Mission 500,” aiming to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030.

India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal visited the U.S. this week to advance negotiations for a multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Both nations have designated senior representatives to work toward a mutually beneficial deal.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com