English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Another Digvijaya shocker

Published

on

Digvijay Singh

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Senior Congressman tweets that Telangana police has set up fake ISIS website to ‘trap Muslim youth’

By Sujit Bhar

Unmoved by his continually diminishing stature within the Congress Party, his growing distance from party chief Sonia Gandhi and even from Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi, and completely oblivious of how his thoughtless comments have been jumped upon by the BJP, Digvijaya Singh has again tried hara-kiri.

He has just tweeted another of his controversial beliefs. This time he has said that the Telangana police have been radicalising Muslim youths, having set up a “bogus” website of the ISIS. This way, believed Singh, the police is encouraging the youths to join the terror group.

He has also claimed in his tweets that the police is “radicalising and encouraging them (the youth) to become ISIS modules”.

He quickly moved to the chief minister of the state, K Chandrasekhar Rao, and asked if he had authorised the police “to trap Muslim youths and encourage them to join the IS”. Then came the regular refrain: “If he has then shouldn’t he own the responsibility and resign? If he hasn’t then shouldn’t he enquire and punish those who are responsible for committing such a heinous crime?”

One must remember that Singh has just been divested of the charge of Goa and Karnataka. He is still in charge of Telangana.

His Goa charge was set to go, with his complete mismanagement and bumbling of the government-forming even after the party had returned maximum number of candidates (17 out of 40, needing just 4 more for simple majority), against the BJP’s 13. Singh’s intransigence in not approaching the local parties quickly to stitch up an alliance, as well as his stubbornness in not approaching the governor (he had believed that as the largest party, the governor was bound to call the Congress first to form government), resulted in a quick-acting BJP sealing all necessary deals. BJP was so fast on the uptake that Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar had resigned even before the party deals were complete and had landed in Goa to take up his post as chief minister.

The Congress was left gaping in wonder.

As for Karnataka, it was a wise decision on the part of Sonia, since the state is set to go to the polls and the party president felt Singh probably would not be the right person to lead the state under such circumstances. Karnataka has gone to former Youth Congress chief KC Venugopal.

Karnataka is very important for the Congress. The recent victory in Punjab apart, this is the other major state the Congress rules. Within the BJP’s drumbeat of “Congress-mukt Bharat”, maybe there is, within the Congress, a special move for removing old vestiges of power centres that are shackles on the feet of the party.

The signs are clear for Singh. He is on his way out. And complete psycho-babble such as is in these tweets are things that he would do well keeping away from.

To be fair, Singh has been a giant in Indian politics for a long time. He has been close to Rajiv Gandhi and also to Sonia, but the spell seems to be breaking. His political astuteness seems to be crumbling and he is clutching at straws. It can be easily predicted that Rahul would have nothing to do with Singh as far as policy matters go, and what lets Singh hang on to power’s coattails is probably his decades of utter loyalty to the Nehru-Gandhi family.

Along the way, he has disregarded his position as a regional satrap and believed he had assumed national importance. The Congress is and will remain a one-family party, and Rahul is still the decision maker on the ground. Singh’s muted call for Priyanka to be on the campaign trail was not lost on the family, which, obviously, has the right to decide who within it is to lead and who is to give ground.

That is the ground reality. Singh’s comments are only adding fuel to the fire. In 2011, when P Chidambaram was home minister, Singh demanded a judicial probe into the Batla House encounter. He believed it was staged. The Batla House grew into a big one, and maybe Singh’s comments lent credence. It is possible that Singh was making these comments out of a real understanding of the situation, but having been in politics for a rather long time, he should at least have known when to keep quiet.

Those words are his last straw.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com