English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Priyanka Gandhi leads protest against G Ram G Bill, calls move to replace MGNREGA unconstitutional

Priyanka Gandhi objected in Lok Sabha to the Centre’s G Ram G Bill, saying it weakens MGNREGA and dilutes the constitutional right to employment.

Published

on

Senior Congress leader and Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Tuesday led a protest in Parliament against the Centre’s move to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the proposed Viksit Bharat Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, 2025, popularly referred to as the G Ram G Bill.

Holding up photographs of Mahatma Gandhi on the Parliament premises, Congress MPs objected to the introduction of the Bill, alleging that it weakens a landmark welfare law that has supported rural livelihoods for two decades.

Priyanka Gandhi opposes Bill in Lok Sabha

During proceedings in the Lok Sabha, Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan sought permission to introduce the new Bill, which aims to replace MGNREGA. Priyanka Gandhi opposed the move under Rule 72(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business, registering what she described as a “strong objection”.

She said MGNREGA had been a revolutionary law since its introduction in 2005 by the UPA government and had enjoyed support across party lines. According to her, the scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to the poorest sections in rural India and has played a key role in strengthening the rural economy.

Concerns over funding model and role of Gram Sabhas

Priyanka Gandhi flagged concerns over changes proposed in the new Bill, particularly the shift from a demand-based funding model to a system where allocations are decided in advance by the Centre. She argued that MGNREGA works on demand from the ground, with Gram Sabhas empowered to assess local employment needs.

“The right to employment is being weakened, and this goes against the Constitution,” she said, adding that the proposed law reduces the role of Gram Sabhas and dilutes the core principle of guaranteed work.

She also pointed out that the Centre’s funding share for the scheme has come down to 60 per cent for most states, warning that this could strain state finances at a time when several states are already awaiting GST dues.

Objection to renaming and passage without discussion

The Congress leader questioned what she described as a “craze” to rename existing schemes, noting that such changes involve additional costs. She urged the government not to rush the legislation and to withdraw the Bill for wider discussion in the House.

When members from the treasury benches made a remark referring to her family, Priyanka Gandhi responded by saying that Mahatma Gandhi may not belong to her family but is regarded as family by the entire nation.

Wider opposition, government defence

Several opposition leaders echoed these concerns. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor opposed the Bill, calling it immoral to remove Mahatma Gandhi’s name from the scheme. Other विपक्ष members raised issues over normative funding and the reduced central contribution.

Government sources, however, defended the Bill, saying it aligns with the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision. They argued that normative funding allows predictable and rational budgeting, unlike a demand-based model that can lead to uncertainty, while still ensuring employment or unemployment allowance for eligible workers.

BJP leader and former Minority Affairs Minister Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi dismissed the opposition’s protest, alleging that the objection stemmed from the inclusion of Lord Ram’s name in the scheme.

India News

EC issues notice to Mallikarjun Kharge over terrorist remark against PM Modi

The Election Commission has issued a notice to Mallikarjun Kharge over his remark on PM Modi, asking for a response within 24 hours amid a growing political controversy.

Published

on

mallikarjun-kharge

The Election Commission has issued a notice to Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge over his controversial remark referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “terrorist” during an election campaign.

Taking serious note of the statement, the poll body has asked Kharge to submit his response within 24 hours, highlighting concerns over the language used in public campaigning.

BJP complaint triggered action

The development comes after the Bharatiya Janata Party approached the Election Commission, alleging that the remark violated the Model Code of Conduct. The party described the comment as derogatory and sought strict action against the Congress leader.

A delegation of BJP leaders also met the poll panel, stressing that such statements undermine the standards of political discourse during elections.

Kharge’s clarification

Following the controversy, Kharge clarified that his remarks were being misinterpreted. He said he did not intend to call the Prime Minister a terrorist but was referring to what he described as “terrorising” political opponents through the use of central agencies.

Rising political tensions

The episode has further escalated tensions between the ruling party and the opposition amid an ongoing election season. Leaders across the political spectrum have reacted strongly, with criticism and counter-criticism intensifying the debate around campaign rhetoric.

The Election Commission’s intervention underscores its attempt to maintain decorum and enforce campaign norms as political activity intensifies across states.

Continue Reading

India News

Noida workers protest under probe as X Storm social media group comes under scanner

Probe into Noida workers protest highlights suspected role of ‘X Storm’ social media group and digital coordination behind the unrest.

Published

on

Authorities have intensified their investigation into the recent workers’ protest in Noida, with a social media network known as “X Storm” now emerging as a key focus in the probe.

The unrest, which began as a demonstration over wage-related concerns, escalated into violence in parts of the industrial hub, prompting a wider inquiry into the factors behind the mobilisation of large groups of workers.

According to officials, investigators are examining how digital platforms may have been used to coordinate the protests. Preliminary findings suggest that multiple online groups and accounts played a role in rapidly mobilising participants and spreading messages related to the agitation.

The role of social media has come under particular scrutiny, with authorities looking into whether organised efforts were made to amplify tensions. Officials are also probing the origin of messages circulated online and the possible involvement of coordinated networks.

Recent findings indicate that such protests may not have been entirely spontaneous. Investigations in similar cases have revealed the use of newly created social media accounts, messaging platforms, and closed groups to mobilise crowds quickly and maintain anonymity.

Additionally, concerns have been raised about external elements potentially influencing the protests. Earlier reports have pointed to the involvement of non-worker participants and coordinated digital campaigns that may have contributed to the escalation of violence.

The Noida protest is part of a broader wave of labour unrest driven by demands for higher wages and improved working conditions. The demonstrations turned violent in some areas, with incidents of stone pelting, arson, and clashes with police reported during the peak of the agitation.

Authorities are now focusing on tracing digital footprints, identifying administrators of online groups, and determining whether there was any larger network orchestrating the unrest.

The investigation remains ongoing, with officials stating that appropriate action will be taken based on the findings.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi’s Bengal poll visit cancelled amid permission row, Congress targets Trinamool

Rahul Gandhi’s Bengal visit was cancelled after authorities did not grant permission, triggering a political row between Congress and Trinamool.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s scheduled visit to West Bengal for election campaigning has been cancelled after the party failed to secure the required administrative permission for public events.

The visit, planned for April 23, was called off after the party waited until the evening for clearance but did not receive approval in time to make necessary arrangements.

Congress leaders have alleged that the local administration, under the influence of the ruling Trinamool Congress, did not grant permission for the rally. The party claimed that despite waiting until around 6 pm, the approval did not come through, forcing them to cancel the programme.

Trinamool response

The Trinamool Congress rejected the allegations, stating that all political parties must follow established procedures for holding public meetings. A party minister said applications must be submitted through the designated system within a specified time frame before events.

The Trinamool also indicated that the state government is currently in a caretaker role during the election period, suggesting that questions regarding permissions fall under the purview of the Election Commission.

Fresh dates likely

Congress sources said the party is still keen for Rahul Gandhi to campaign in the state and may seek fresh permission for a visit on April 25 or 26.

Political context

The development comes amid heightened political activity ahead of the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections, where multiple parties are campaigning aggressively. The Congress and Trinamool Congress, despite being part of broader opposition alignments at the national level, remain direct rivals in the state.

Recent reports also indicate that permission-related issues have affected campaign events in the state, with some rallies being cancelled due to lack of police clearance.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com