English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rahul Gandhi attacks G RAM G bill, says move against villages and states

Rahul Gandhi has criticised the G RAM G bill cleared by Parliament, alleging it dilutes the rights-based structure of MGNREGA and centralises control over rural employment.

Published

on

Rahul Gandhi

Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi has launched a sharp attack on the Modi government after Parliament cleared the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Employment and Livelihood Mission (Rural) Bill, commonly referred to as the ‘G RAM G’ bill. He described the proposed law as “anti-state” and “anti-village”, arguing that it weakens the core spirit of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

The new legislation, which is positioned as an updated version of MGNREGA, was passed amid protests by opposition parties and is expected to replace the existing scheme once it receives presidential assent.

‘Bulldozed without scrutiny’, says Rahul Gandhi

Rahul Gandhi criticised the manner in which the bill was cleared, saying it was pushed through Parliament without adequate debate or examination. He pointed out that the opposition’s demand to refer the bill to a standing committee was rejected.

According to him, any law that fundamentally alters the rural employment framework and affects crores of workers should undergo detailed scrutiny, expert consultation and public hearings before approval.

Claim of dilution of rights-based guarantee

Targeting the central government, the Congress leader said the proposed law dismantles the rights-based and demand-driven nature of MGNREGA and replaces it with a rationed system controlled from Delhi. He argued that this shift undermines the autonomy of states and villages.

Rahul Gandhi alleged that the intent behind the move is to centralise power and weaken labour, particularly impacting rural communities such as Dalits, OBCs and Adivasis.

Defence of MGNREGA’s impact

Highlighting the role of MGNREGA, Gandhi said the scheme provided rural workers with bargaining power, reduced distress migration and improved wages and working conditions, while also contributing to rural infrastructure development.

He also recalled the role of MGNREGA during the Covid period, stating that it prevented crores of people from slipping into hunger and debt. According to him, any rationing of a jobs programme first affects women, landless workers and the poorest communities.

Opposition to name change and provisions

The Congress has also objected to the renaming of the scheme, accusing the government of attempting to erase the legacy associated with Mahatma Gandhi. Opposition MPs staged a dharna within the Parliament complex, questioning provisions of the bill that they claim dilute the “soul and spirit” of the original law enacted in 2005.

Under MGNREGA, the government guaranteed 100 days of work in rural areas along with an unemployment allowance if work was not provided. The ‘G RAM G’ bill proposes to raise the guaranteed workdays to 125, while retaining other provisions. However, critics have flagged concerns over employment being linked to pre-approved plans.

The bill was cleared after a midnight voice vote in the Rajya Sabha, following its passage in the Lok Sabha amid protests and walkouts. It will become law once approved by the President.

India News

EC issues notice to Mallikarjun Kharge over terrorist remark against PM Modi

The Election Commission has issued a notice to Mallikarjun Kharge over his remark on PM Modi, asking for a response within 24 hours amid a growing political controversy.

Published

on

mallikarjun-kharge

The Election Commission has issued a notice to Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge over his controversial remark referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “terrorist” during an election campaign.

Taking serious note of the statement, the poll body has asked Kharge to submit his response within 24 hours, highlighting concerns over the language used in public campaigning.

BJP complaint triggered action

The development comes after the Bharatiya Janata Party approached the Election Commission, alleging that the remark violated the Model Code of Conduct. The party described the comment as derogatory and sought strict action against the Congress leader.

A delegation of BJP leaders also met the poll panel, stressing that such statements undermine the standards of political discourse during elections.

Kharge’s clarification

Following the controversy, Kharge clarified that his remarks were being misinterpreted. He said he did not intend to call the Prime Minister a terrorist but was referring to what he described as “terrorising” political opponents through the use of central agencies.

Rising political tensions

The episode has further escalated tensions between the ruling party and the opposition amid an ongoing election season. Leaders across the political spectrum have reacted strongly, with criticism and counter-criticism intensifying the debate around campaign rhetoric.

The Election Commission’s intervention underscores its attempt to maintain decorum and enforce campaign norms as political activity intensifies across states.

Continue Reading

India News

Noida workers protest under probe as X Storm social media group comes under scanner

Probe into Noida workers protest highlights suspected role of ‘X Storm’ social media group and digital coordination behind the unrest.

Published

on

Authorities have intensified their investigation into the recent workers’ protest in Noida, with a social media network known as “X Storm” now emerging as a key focus in the probe.

The unrest, which began as a demonstration over wage-related concerns, escalated into violence in parts of the industrial hub, prompting a wider inquiry into the factors behind the mobilisation of large groups of workers.

According to officials, investigators are examining how digital platforms may have been used to coordinate the protests. Preliminary findings suggest that multiple online groups and accounts played a role in rapidly mobilising participants and spreading messages related to the agitation.

The role of social media has come under particular scrutiny, with authorities looking into whether organised efforts were made to amplify tensions. Officials are also probing the origin of messages circulated online and the possible involvement of coordinated networks.

Recent findings indicate that such protests may not have been entirely spontaneous. Investigations in similar cases have revealed the use of newly created social media accounts, messaging platforms, and closed groups to mobilise crowds quickly and maintain anonymity.

Additionally, concerns have been raised about external elements potentially influencing the protests. Earlier reports have pointed to the involvement of non-worker participants and coordinated digital campaigns that may have contributed to the escalation of violence.

The Noida protest is part of a broader wave of labour unrest driven by demands for higher wages and improved working conditions. The demonstrations turned violent in some areas, with incidents of stone pelting, arson, and clashes with police reported during the peak of the agitation.

Authorities are now focusing on tracing digital footprints, identifying administrators of online groups, and determining whether there was any larger network orchestrating the unrest.

The investigation remains ongoing, with officials stating that appropriate action will be taken based on the findings.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi’s Bengal poll visit cancelled amid permission row, Congress targets Trinamool

Rahul Gandhi’s Bengal visit was cancelled after authorities did not grant permission, triggering a political row between Congress and Trinamool.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s scheduled visit to West Bengal for election campaigning has been cancelled after the party failed to secure the required administrative permission for public events.

The visit, planned for April 23, was called off after the party waited until the evening for clearance but did not receive approval in time to make necessary arrangements.

Congress leaders have alleged that the local administration, under the influence of the ruling Trinamool Congress, did not grant permission for the rally. The party claimed that despite waiting until around 6 pm, the approval did not come through, forcing them to cancel the programme.

Trinamool response

The Trinamool Congress rejected the allegations, stating that all political parties must follow established procedures for holding public meetings. A party minister said applications must be submitted through the designated system within a specified time frame before events.

The Trinamool also indicated that the state government is currently in a caretaker role during the election period, suggesting that questions regarding permissions fall under the purview of the Election Commission.

Fresh dates likely

Congress sources said the party is still keen for Rahul Gandhi to campaign in the state and may seek fresh permission for a visit on April 25 or 26.

Political context

The development comes amid heightened political activity ahead of the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections, where multiple parties are campaigning aggressively. The Congress and Trinamool Congress, despite being part of broader opposition alignments at the national level, remain direct rivals in the state.

Recent reports also indicate that permission-related issues have affected campaign events in the state, with some rallies being cancelled due to lack of police clearance.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com