English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Uproar in Rajya Sabha over renaming UP’s Mughalsarai station after BJP icon Deen Dayal Upadhyay

Published

on

Uproar in Rajya Sabha over renaming UP’s Mughalsarai station after BJP icon Deen Dayal Upadhyay

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]SP and BSP members oppose Centre’s decision to allow Yogi Adityanath government’s proposal for renaming the railway station that was established in 1862, BJP says “they can accept Mughal names but not a great thinker’s”

The Rajya Sabha once again witnessed uproarious scenes, on Friday, as Opposition members from the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party launched a scathing attack at the Centre for approving the renaming of Uttar Pradesh’s historic Mughalsarai station after Deen Dayal Upadhyay, a founding member of the Jan Sangh – the precursor to the present day BJP.

According to a report in the Indian Express, the Union home ministry had, on Thursday, given its nod to a proposal sent by the Yogi Adityanath-led Uttar Pradesh government to rename the station, which was established by the British East India Company in 1862 in its bid to connect Howrah with Delhi.

Senior SP leader Naresh Agarwal had moved a notice under Rule 267 for the suspension of listed parliamentary business so that the Upper House could have a discussion on the renaming of the railway station. Agarwal claimed that the “government is trying to forcibly change Uttar Pradesh’s geography” while alleging that the Centre was soon “going to change New Delhi’s name too”.

However, Rajya Sabha deputy chairman, PJ Kurien dismissed Agarwal’s notice and listed the matter for discussion in the Zero Hour instead.

Agarwal and other members of the SP began shouting slogans against the government’s move and were quickly joined by members of the other prominent political player in UP – Mayawati’s BSP. Seldom on the same side of a political discourse, the SP and BSP members claimed in unison that the BJP was renaming the historic station after someone who had made “no contribution to India’s freedom struggle”.

Union minister Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi led the BJP’s counter-charge, asking the Opposition members why they had “no objection to Mughal names but cannot accept the name of a great thinker”.

While the Opposition members continued with their tirade, daring the government to also “change the name of this country”, and repeatedly asking the Treasury Benches to explain Upadhyay’s contribution to the nation, all that Naqvi could summon up was – “go and read history”.

The uproar led to a 10-minute adjournment of the Rajya Sabha proceedings.

Uproar in Rajya Sabha over renaming UP’s Mughalsarai station after BJP icon Deen Dayal Upadhyay

The Centre’s decision to approve the Adityanath government’s proposal appear to stem from a renewed campaign by the BJP to establish Upadhyay as a national icon. The party leadership, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and national president Amit Shah, never fail to mention Upadhyay and his doctrine of ‘Ekatma Manavavad’at public rallies. More recently, the Congress had protested against the acceptance speech of President Ram Nath Kovind, when he mentioned Upadhyay in the same breath as Mahatma Gandhi while addressing the Parliament after being sworn in to office but skipped any reference to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the country’s first prime minister.

Upadhyay, who took over the task of expanding a fledgling Jan Sangh’s imprint across India when its founding chief Shyama Prasad Mookerjee passed away in 1953,  had died under mysterious circumstance on February 11, 1968 in Mughalsarai, while travelling in a train.

There are many conspiracy theories about Upadhyay’s death. Balraj Madhok, another of Jan Sangh’s founding members, had often insisted that Upadhyay’s death was a murder and not an accident.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Farooq, Omar Abdullah to meet upset NC MLAs amid party discontent

Farooq Abdullah and Omar Abdullah are set to meet National Conference MLAs who have raised concerns following the recent Cabinet expansion in Jammu and Kashmir.

Published

on

Omar Abdullah

Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (NC) president Farooq Abdullah and Chief Minister Omar Abdullah are set to meet a group of party legislators who have raised concerns following the recent expansion of the Union Territory’s Council of Ministers.

The meeting is scheduled in Srinagar on Friday as the party leadership attempts to address grievances raised by several NC MLAs. Reports indicate that the legislators had met separately ahead of their interaction with the Abdullahs to finalise the issues they wanted to raise. 

The developments come days after Omar Abdullah expanded his Cabinet, inducting four new ministers and dropping Independent MLA Satish Sharma from the Council of Ministers. The reshuffle has led to discontent among sections of the ruling National Conference, particularly among legislators who were not included in the new ministerial team. 

What the NC MLAs want

The legislators have raised concerns about the functioning of the party and government, including the need for greater authority for elected representatives, stronger party organisation at the grassroots level and better implementation of commitments made to voters.

Some members of the group have also demanded changes involving ministers and the Chief Minister’s advisor Nasir Aslam Wani. Earlier reports said the legislators had prepared a memorandum outlining their grievances and demands. 

The group has stressed that its concerns are aimed at strengthening the party rather than destabilising the government. One legislator described the focus as improving the party’s functioning at the grassroots level and ensuring that MLAs are empowered to address public grievances.

Cabinet expansion triggered tensions

The latest discontent followed Omar Abdullah’s Cabinet expansion, under which four new ministers were inducted. They include Ali Mohammad Sagar, Mir Saifullah, Shamima Firdous and Altaf Ahmad Kaloo. Independent MLA Satish Sharma was dropped from the Council of Ministers. 

The Cabinet changes had already prompted concerns among some senior legislators over ministerial representation and the functioning of the party organisation. The disagreement has since developed into a broader discussion about the role and empowerment of elected representatives.

The meeting with Farooq and Omar Abdullah is therefore significant as the party leadership seeks to engage directly with the legislators and address their concerns.

Continue Reading

India News

Hardeep Singh Puri elected unopposed to Rajya Sabha from Madhya Pradesh

Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has been elected unopposed to the Rajya Sabha from Madhya Pradesh after the nominations of two other candidates, including a Congress-backed nominee, were rejected.

Published

on

Hardeep Puri

Union Petroleum Minister and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Hardeep Singh Puri has been elected unopposed to the Rajya Sabha from Madhya Pradesh. The announcement was made on Thursday after the deadline for withdrawal of nominations ended, leaving Puri as the only candidate in the contest.

Puri’s election followed the rejection of nomination papers filed by two other candidates, Kante Sayanna and Rajkumar Lohani, who was backed by the Opposition Congress. Their nominations were rejected during the scrutiny process, making Puri the sole candidate remaining in the fray.

Returning Officer Umesh Sharma formally declared Puri elected to the Upper House of Parliament. Madhya Pradesh BJP president Hemant Khandelwal collected his certificate of election from the returning officer in the presence of party MLA Rameshwar Sharma.

Why Hardeep Singh Puri was elected unopposed

The Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sabha bypoll witnessed three candidates initially entering the contest. However, the nomination papers of the two other candidates did not clear scrutiny.

Kante Sayanna and Congress-backed candidate Rajkumar Lohani had their nominations rejected during the examination of election papers. With both candidates out of the contest, Puri remained the only candidate.

As a result, the returning officer declared him elected unopposed on the final day of withdrawal of nominations on November 5.

The bypoll, if required, had been scheduled to take place on November 12.

Why the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sabha seat fell vacant

The by-election became necessary following the resignation of former Union minister L Murugan from the Rajya Sabha last month.

Murugan’s departure created a vacancy in the Upper House from Madhya Pradesh. His original term was scheduled to continue until April 2, 2030.

The BJP subsequently nominated Hardeep Singh Puri as its candidate for the by-election.

Puri, a former diplomat who later entered politics, currently serves as the Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas.

Continue Reading

India News

Amit Shah challenges Rahul Gandhi to debate SIR in Parliament

Amit Shah responded to Rahul Gandhi’s public debate challenge by inviting him to discuss the SIR exercise in Parliament. He also criticised the Congress over its demand for Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation.

Published

on

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has challenged Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to take up his demand for a public debate with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Parliament, saying the government is ready to convene a special session to discuss the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.

Addressing a rally in Haryana’s Karnal, Shah directly responded to Gandhi’s challenge to the Prime Minister, asking the Congress leader to write to PM Modi if he wanted a discussion.

“I want to challenge Rahul Gandhi directly. You challenge PM Modi for a discussion? If you want a discussion, simply write a letter to PM Modi. We are ready to convene a special session of Parliament to discuss the SIR exercise… Come and debate in Parliament,” Shah said.

The remarks came two days after Rahul Gandhi issued another public debate challenge to the Prime Minister.

On November 3, Gandhi wrote in a post on X that PM Modi could choose any stage or venue for a discussion. He proposed debating allegations concerning who was anti-national and who had connections with foreign forces, adding that the media and the country’s youth should also be present.

Amit Shah targets Congress over SIR controversy

During his address, Shah also criticised the Congress over its demand for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Referring to the 2014, 2019 and 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the Home Minister argued that the Congress had lost despite no Special Intensive Revision exercise being conducted during those elections.

“Where was the SIR in 2014? You were completely wiped out even then. Where was SIR in 2019? You lost. There was no SIR in 2024 either, yet you lost again,” he said.

Shah also referred to the elections in Haryana and Maharashtra, claiming that there was no SIR exercise in either state when the Congress suffered electoral defeats.

He accused the Opposition of disrupting parliamentary proceedings and organising protests on the streets instead of allowing Parliament to function.

Shah criticises Rahul Gandhi over protests

The Home Minister further alleged that Rahul Gandhi and the Congress were creating disorder through street protests and parliamentary boycotts.

Shah said BJP workers would give a “fitting reply” if Gandhi continued to mobilise crowds on the streets.

He also questioned Gandhi’s claim to have mobilised large numbers of people for a rally in Delhi, alleging that the venue had a capacity of 70,000 and was still half empty despite an appeal to bring 10 lakh people.

“The people of the country have consistently defeated Rahul Gandhi and the Congress party. The people of the country are not with you or the Opposition alliance,” Shah said.

Amit Shah raises questions over Rahul Gandhi’s foreign visits

Shah also sought details about Rahul Gandhi’s foreign visits, arguing that people had a right to know about them.

“You’re Leader of Opposition… People have the right to know,” the Home Minister said.

His remarks came amid the continuing political confrontation between the BJP and Congress over the SIR exercise, electoral processes and the Opposition’s criticism of the Election Commission.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com