English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Top Stories

10-minute delivery service is safe for delivery partners as 30-minute delivery, know why Zomato founder Deepinder Goyal said this

“There are no fines for late deliveries. For both 10- and 30-minute deliveries, there are no incentives for on-time delivery, on a Twitter thread, Mr. Goyal stated. He went on to say, “We’re creating additional food stations to provide 10-minute service for certain customer locations only.”

Published

on

Deepinder Goyal, the founder of Zomato, has announced the details for the latest 10-minute meals delivery service of the food-ordering app, a day after the decision was denounced by a few people in which they said that it is an open door for the company to force delivery partners into such a difficult and risky job role.

The 10-minute home delivery system, according to Mr. Goyal will be for selective close places and only for demanding, and standard items only.

This morning, on March 22, 2022, Mr. Goyal tweeted “Hello, Twitter, and welcome to the day. I just want to explain how 10-minute delivery works and how it is just as safe for our delivery partners as 30-minute delivery. Please go through this (before the indignation) for 2 minutes this time,”.

Read Also: Zomato’s 10 minutes food delivery announcement invites hilarious memes, check here

Zomato delivery partners, he claims, are unaware of the claimed arrival time for both 10 and 30 minutes deliveries.

“There are no fines for late deliveries. For both 10- and 30-minute deliveries, there are no incentives for on-time delivery, on a Twitter thread, Mr. Goyal stated. He went on to say, “We’re creating additional food stations to provide 10-minute service for certain customer locations only.”

On March 21, 2022, many people on social media criticized the 10-minute meal service as impractical and perhaps risky for food delivery partners. Several people have raised worry that Zomato’s 10-minute delivery guarantee will make delivery partners’ jobs more difficult. Cyber security expert Jiten Jain is one of them.

“As a consumer, ten minutes sounds incredible. However, this will certainly make your delivery crew nervous and erratic. I’m confident that waiting 30 minutes for wonderful meals to arrive at our door is worthwhile “Mr. Jain wrote on Twitter.

In response to the backlash, Mr. Goyal stated in a tweet today that 10-minute delivery will result in less time on the road per order. Mr. Goyal said, “We continue to educate our delivery partners on road safety and also provide accidental and life insurance.”

“Yes, we will also give you Maggi through our 10-minute food stations,” he continued, referring to memes that linked Zomato’s superfast service to Maggi’s brand identity of “2-Minute Noodles.”

2 years of Janata curfew to fight Covid-19, Tweeple share hillarious memes

Ruchi Soya FPO: What is follow-on public offer? Check price band, steps to invest and other details

India News

Lok Sabha passes Waqf Amendment Bill

Singh called the bill “illegitimate,” alleging it was designed to incite violence ahead of assembly elections in Bihar and West Bengal, purely to create controversy.

Published

on

After more than 12 hours of debate, the Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, by 288 votes in favour and 232 against.

The bill, introduced earlier in the day by Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, aims to enhance the management of Waqf properties, leverage technology for transparency, and resolve administrative complexities, as recommended by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).

Rijiju hailed the JPC’s consultation process as the most extensive in India’s parliamentary history, noting that it received over 97.27 lakh petitions and memorandums through physical and online channels. “Each submission was carefully reviewed before finalizing the report,” he said, underscoring the thoroughness of the exercise.

However, the Bill’s passage was far from smooth. Union Home Minister Amit Shah robustly defended the legislation, accusing the Opposition of spreading “fear-mongering for vote-bank politics” by claiming it interferes with Muslims’ religious affairs and property rights.

“No land can be declared Waqf property by mere declaration. Lands belonging to the Archaeological Survey of India, governments, tribal communities, and private citizens will be safeguarded by this law. All Muslim communities—Shia, Pasmanda, Ahmadiya, Bohras—can register trusts without going through the Waqf route,” Shah clarified during the debate.

He dismissed Opposition allegations that laws like the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the abrogation of Article 370, the Triple Talaq ban, and the Ram Mandir construction had stripped Muslims of citizenship, challenging critics to provide evidence. “Look at Jammu and Kashmir—Omar Abdullah is ruling as Chief Minister,” he pointed out, countering the narrative.

Shah also invoked RJD chief Lalu Yadav’s 2013 remarks, where Yadav had called for a strong law to curb thefts in the name of Waqf properties. “You couldn’t fulfill his wish, but Narendra Modi has. This bill will apply retrospectively,” Shah declared, asserting that the Modi government was pursuing a “politics of progress.” He confidently predicted, “Modi has been elected for three terms, and for the next three terms, it will be a BJP government.”

Speaking in the Lower House, Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi, the Deputy Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, accused the government of using the Bill to “weaken the Constitution, defame minorities, divide Indian society, and disenfranchise marginalized groups.”

He challenged Rijiju’s claim that the UPA government had transferred 123 properties to the Delhi Waqf Board before the 2014 elections, labeling it “a complete lie” and demanding proof. “Rijiju misled the House with political accusations,” Gogoi charged, also criticizing Speaker Om Birla for not intervening.

Rijiju retorted by asking Gogoi to specify which part of his statement was inaccurate. “Don’t make blanket accusations; point to the exact issue,” he urged. Gogoi doubled down, reiterating his objection to Rijiju’s 2013 references.

Congress MP KC Venugopal took a broader swipe, accusing the Centre of an “agenda to destroy minorities.” Without naming Prime Minister Narendra Modi, he warned, “Today you target Muslims, tomorrow Christians, and the day after, Sikhs. You are dividing the country for political gain in the name of religion, even as you project yourself as a world leader abroad. The world is watching.”

Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP of introducing the Bill to distract from its past failures, questioning their commitment to women’s empowerment by asking how many female candidates they would field in the upcoming Uttar Pradesh elections. He cautioned that the bill threatened India’s secular fabric.

Speaking to reporters, Aam Aadmi Party leader Sanjay Singh and MLA Amanatullah Khan also voiced strong objections. Khan questioned Shah’s claims about the prime locations of 130 Waqf properties, hinting at a BJP plot to seize them, citing past encroachments on Muslim graveyards and buildings. Singh called the bill “illegitimate,” alleging it was designed to incite violence ahead of assembly elections in Bihar and West Bengal, purely to create controversy.

Continue Reading

India News

Bharat Shiksha Summit 2025 to explore future, evolving landscape of education on April 3

Published

on

By

Bharat Shiksha Summit 2025

The Bharat Shiksha Summit 2025 will be held on Thursday (April 3) in New Delhi’s Vigyan Bhawan. The theme of the Summit is Shaping The Future of Education. The event will see prominent leaders, educationists, legal practitioners, EdTech innovators and policymakers brainstorm on the future and evolving landscape of education in the country.

The inaugural session will have a keynote address by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and speeches by Supreme Court judge Justice Rajesh Bindal, Supreme Court Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai, Balaji Foundation Chairperson Rajshri Rai and All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam.

The session on The Vision of National Education Policy will see a keynote address by Jammu & Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha and speeches by Uttar Pradesh Deputy CM and Minister for Medical Education Brajesh Pathak, Member of Parliament Naveen Jindal, Association of Indian Universities Secretary General Pankaj Mittal, Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai and Educationist Prof. Bhim Sen Singh.

Keeping in mind the Summit’s aims of exploring reforms, challenges, and future opportunities in the light of global educational advancements, the next session will be on Education, Culture & Contemporary Development. The session will have speeches by Goa Minister for Tourism, IT and Electronics and Communication Rohan Khaunte, historian Dr Vikram Sampath, Kucnow University Vice-Chancellor Prof. Alok Rai, National Law University Delhi Founder Prof. Ranbir Singh, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women (IGDTUW) Vice-Chancellor Prof. Ranjana Jha, GTC Group Chairman RK Mahato, Balaji Foundation Chairperson Rajshri Rai, Educationist Prof. Bhim Sen Singh  and Poet-Author Aalok Shrivastav.

The subsequent session will be on Imagining Indian Education. The session will be addressed by Social Justice and Empowerment Minister of State BL Verma, Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying and Panchayati Raj Minister of State SP Singh Baghel, Rural Development Minister of State Kamlesh Paswan and Ambedkar University Delhi Vice-Chancellor Prof. Anu Singh Lather.

The following session, Education Without Borders, will be addressed by External Affairs Minister of State Kirti Vardhan Singh, Members of Parliament Rajiv Rai and Nishikant Dubey, SAARC University President Prof. KK Aggarwal, DY Patil International University Vice-Chancellor Prof. Prabhat Ranjan, Educationist Prof. Bhim Sen Singh, GGSIP University, New Delhi Dean and Professor Prof. Dhananjay Joshi.

The penultimate session will be focused on Legal Education and Training: Bridging Theory and Practice. Supreme Court judge Justice JK Maheshwari Attorney General of India R. Venkatramani, Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai, National Law Institute University, Bhopal Vice-Chancellor Prof. (Dr.) S. Surya Prakash and National Law University, Delhi Vice-Chancellor Prof GS Bajpai will speak on the many facets of legal education.

The final session, From Verses to Values: Nurturing National Identity Through Poetry & Culture, will have speeches by Members of Parliament Manoj Tiwari and Sudhanshu Trivedi, Janab Waseem Barelvi, Dr. Hariom Panwar, Gajendra Solanki, Poet-Author Dr. Anamika.

Continue Reading

India News

Waqf Bill in Lok Sabha: Amit Shah says Opposition resorting to fear-mongering to save vote bank

He clarified that such contributions must be derived from personal property and cannot be sourced from government assets.

Published

on

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday expressed support for the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, addressing concerns and criticisms raised by opposition lawmakers in Lok Sabha. Shah accused Opposition MPs of disseminating various misinformation, suggesting that their motives may be either unintentional or politically driven.

Addressing the Lower House, Shah emphasized that Waqf, which pertains to donations made for religious charities in the name of Allah, represents a charitable endowment made without any expectation of reclaiming the funds. He clarified that such contributions must be derived from personal property and cannot be sourced from government assets.

Shah further noted, “There is no provision to appoint any non-Muslim members to the Waqf. We do not intend to do so, as there will be no intrusion into the religious affairs of Muslims. The opposition’s resistance stems from a desire to appease their voter base.”

On this day, the Lok Sabha began deliberation on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which includes recommendations from a Joint Parliamentary Committee that reviewed the legislation after its introduction in August of the previous year. Additionally, the House considered the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024, both introduced for discussion and approval by Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju.

Shah clarified that while non-Muslim members could be appointed to the board and administrative councils, this would be strictly for administrative functions. He questioned whether a Hindu, Jain, or Sikh could serve as a charity commissioner in a non-religious capacity, arguing that such a move is vital for national integrity.

He insisted that the necessity for the current bill arose from amendments made in 2013 that he considered extreme, highlighting the past government’s inappropriate allocation of prime land in Lutyens Delhi as Waqf properties before the 2014 elections.

Earlier in the day, Union Minister Rijiju defended the Waqf Amendment Bill, asserting that the reforms are positive and necessary, countering claims from those with no direct stake in the bill, who he alleged are being misled.

However, Congress MP KC Venugopal criticized the expedited process, claiming it deprived opposition members of the opportunity to propose amendments. Fellow Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi condemned the bill, arguing that it undermines constitutional values and further marginalizes minority communities.

Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP of introducing new legislation to distract from its past failures. Commenting on the government’s claims of promoting women’s empowerment through the Waqf Bill, he challenged the BJP by questioning how many women candidates they would nominate in the upcoming Uttar Pradesh elections. He expressed concern that the Waqf Bill threatens to compromise the country’s secular identity.

AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan also weighed in, questioning Shah’s claims regarding the prime locations of 130 Waqf properties, suggesting that the BJP’s true intentions may involve seizing these properties, referencing past actions against Muslim-owned graveyards and buildings. He raised concerns about the government’s plans for properties that are not officially recorded as Waqf.

Meanwhile, Eknath Shinde, Chief of Shiv Sena and Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister, reiterated his party’s stance on the Waqf Board, affirming, “Our position has always been unequivocal. We will not compromise our views for the sake of power or self-interest. Our support for the Waqf Amendment Bill is firmly rooted in promoting the welfare and progress of the Muslim community.”

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com