English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Aadhaar not required for NEET, other all India exams, rules Supreme Court

Published

on

Aadhaar not required for NEET, other all India exams, rules Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Wednesday, March 7 ruled that Aadhaar cards would not be mandatory students appearing in NEET 2018 and other all India exams.

Delivering the order, a five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief justice Dipak Misra and comprising Justices AK Sikri, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, directed the CBSE to upload the information on their website.

The CJI, addressing the respondents, said that they need to follow the court’s interim order which said Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory.

Earlier, in the morning, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) had told the apex court that it has not authorised CBSE to mandatorily take Aadhaar number of students to get themselves enrolled for appearing in NEET 2018 examination.

Attorney-General KK Venugopal had said he has instructions from UIDAI that like in Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya and Assam other identity proofs like passport, voter card and ration card can be used by the CBSE for enrolling the students in the examination.

The UIDAI’s remarks came on a plea challenging the decision of CBSE seeking Aadhaar number or Aadhaar enrolment number from students who are aspiring to take up the NEET 2018 examination.

The Gujarat High Court had dismissed the plea on February 27 and its order was challenged in the Supreme Court.

Senior counsel Arvind Datar, arguing for petitioners, said that the forced use of Aadhaar for availing of several services is amounting to almost coercion. He gave the example of a driving licence (Motor vehicles Act), where you will not be deprived of benefits accruing because you do not have a licence.

He made a clear point in this. He said: “If it wasn’t a money bill and had gone to the Rajya Sabha, Section 57 of the Aadhaar Act wouldn’t have been passed.”

[Section  57 says that the Act is “not to prevent use of Aadhaar number for other purposes under law. Nothing contained in this Act shall prevent the use of Aadhaar number for establishing the identity of an individual for any purpose, whether by the State or any body corporate or person, pursuant to any law, for the time being in force, or any contract to this effect…”]

Datar said: “Consent is said to be free without any coercion, but in the present scenario there’s a coercion; so much so that if your Aadhaar is not linked your account will be closed.”

He said: “To enroll or not to enroll is my wish. When I exercise this right, I do not exercise in reference to Sec.3 of the Aadhaar Act, but because of my right to privacy. Under rule of law, is it permissible to coerce at every stage? This is what your lordships must decide. Sec.8(2)(a) is rendered irrelevant now, because the consent part has been removed by authorities under this section and will be closed on this March 31,” he said.

[Sec.8(2)(a) of Aadhaar Act says: “unless otherwise provided in this Act, obtain the consent of an individual before collecting his identity information for the purposes of authentication in such manner as may be specified by regulations.”]

He said Aadhaar is a choice. “But if I don’t take Aadhaar, I cannot link it with PAN card which has been mandated. This will mean as if I never had a PAN card because it will cancel my PAN card. After Puttuswamy case, this is my decision with my privacy, on whether to take Aadhaar or not. Article 14,19  and 21 entitles me not to take Aadhaar.”

Datar pointed out various orders of the court. “Twenty nine applications were made for relaxing the orders of the court which prayed that Aadhaar must not be mandatory for filling of forms. It is voluntary,” he said.

He also said: “A total of 2,000 applicants could not fill forms for their exams in state of Gujarat, because they did not have Aadhaar.”

At this point that the CJI said that this writ was useless. Justice Misra said that the high court’s interim stay, saying Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory will have to be abided by.

Justice Chandrachud also made it clear that the interim order passed in October 2015 will stay till the time matter is disposed off.

Extension of deadline

One senior advocate also mentioned that the deadline for linking of documents to Aadhaar must also be extended beyond March 31.

Chidambaram submits

Senior advocate P Chidambaram, starting his submission, said that the Aadhaar bill has been passed as a money bill so as to bypass the Rajya Sabha. He pointed to Article 110 and he pointed out the difference between 117 (financial bill) and 110 (money bill). He said that a financial bill can be a bill which is related to provisions from a-f and others also but a money bill can only be related to provisions between a-f.

A money bill is a subset of financial bill which is a subset of a bill. He submits that nothing escapes in a guise of a money bill.

The matter continues.

India News

CJP hits back at Kangana Ranaut over Gen Z remarks, says young people have done more for the country

The Cockroach Janta Party has criticised BJP MP Kangana Ranaut over her comments on Gen Z protesters, saying elected representatives should maintain dignity and respect young people’s contribution to the country.

Published

on

The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has strongly criticised BJP MP Kangana Ranaut over her remarks targeting Gen Z protesters, saying the actor-turned-politician’s comments were inappropriate and did not reflect the responsibility expected from an elected representative.

The exchange comes days after Ranaut criticised protesters who participated in demonstrations led by the CJP over the alleged NEET paper leak, describing their language as “crass” and referring to them as “Generation Gutter” in an Instagram post.

CJP dismisses Kangana Ranaut’s criticism

Responding to Ranaut’s remarks on Tuesday, CJP spokesperson Saurav Das said the BJP MP was not taken seriously even within her own party and claimed younger generations were unlikely to pay attention to her statements.

Das also referred to Ranaut’s earlier comments about the workload of being a Member of Parliament, arguing that they reflected a lack of seriousness. He accused the MP of criticising young people while exposing what he described as her own casual approach towards public office.

Calls for dignified political discourse

The CJP spokesperson said public representatives should use measured language and uphold the dignity associated with their constitutional positions.

According to Das, Gen Z has made meaningful contributions to the country and has played an important role in strengthening public faith in democratic processes. He argued that such contributions should not be dismissed through sweeping remarks about an entire generation.

Kangana Ranaut’s remarks

In a series of Instagram posts on Monday, Ranaut criticised the conduct of protesters participating in demonstrations at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar and elsewhere. She questioned their upbringing, described their language as offensive, and said their online content left her wanting a “digital detox.”

The BJP MP also criticised women participating in the protests, alleging they glorified substance abuse and depended on their parents financially. She referred to them as “Generation Gutter” and made further remarks questioning their abilities and contribution to society.

Her comments drew criticism from several political leaders, with some demanding an apology and questioning whether she fully understood the issues surrounding the NEET controversy that triggered the protests.

Background of the protests

The CJP began its protests at Jantar Mantar on June 20, demanding accountability over the alleged NEET paper leak and calling for the resignation of then Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

The agitation intensified with a Parliament March on July 20, during which protesters and police clashed. Authorities said more than 118 police personnel were injured, while protesters alleged the use of lathicharge, tear gas and pellet guns during the confrontation.

Following two rounds of discussions between the Centre and the CJP, Dharmendra Pradhan resigned from the post of Education Minister on Saturday. The CJP subsequently ended its protest after stating that it had received assurances that peaceful demonstrators would not face action and that families of students who died by suicide following the NEET paper leak would receive compensation.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi attacks Pralhad Joshi’s appointment as Education Minister over Bilkis Bano remission remarks

Rahul Gandhi criticised the appointment of Pralhad Joshi as Education Minister, alleging the BJP chose a leader who had defended the remission granted to convicts in the Bilkis Bano case. Priyanka Gandhi also questioned the decision in Parliament.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday strongly criticised the appointment of Pralhad Joshi as the Union Education Minister, alleging that the BJP had entrusted the ministry to a leader who had defended the premature release of the convicts in the Bilkis Bano case.

Speaking to reporters outside Parliament, Gandhi expressed surprise over Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s decision to hand over the Education Ministry to Joshi after Dharmendra Pradhan stepped down from the post following sustained protests over alleged paper leaks.

Referring to Joshi’s earlier remarks on the remission granted to 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano case, Gandhi said the BJP had chosen a “defender of rapists” for the Education Ministry. He further alleged that there could not be “a filthier man” than someone who believes rapists deserve protection.

His remarks came while the Lok Sabha was debating a Bill aimed at strengthening action against unfair practices in public examinations.

Rahul Gandhi cites Joshi’s earlier remarks on Bilkis Bano case

Pralhad Joshi had defended the Gujarat government’s decision to grant remission to 11 men convicted of raping Bilkis Bano and murdering members of her family during the 2002 Gujarat riots.

At the time, Joshi had stated that the convicts had spent a considerable period in prison and that their release was carried out under the legal process. He had also referred to their reported good behaviour while serving their sentences as one of the factors behind the decision.

In 2024, however, the Supreme Court cancelled the remission granted to the convicts, observing that the order lacked legal competence.

Priyanka Gandhi also questions the appointment

Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra echoed Rahul Gandhi’s criticism during her speech in the Lok Sabha.

She said the appointment of a minister who had previously supported the release of the Bilkis Bano convicts sent an adverse message to women and girls across the country. According to her, the Prime Minister’s decision conveyed a clear message without any ambiguity.

Earlier, while Rahul Gandhi was addressing reporters, Priyanka Gandhi also pointed out that many women had participated in the protests related to the education system.

Education Ministry changed after paper leak protests

Dharmendra Pradhan resigned as Union Education Minister on Saturday following weeks of protests led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) over alleged paper leaks. The demonstrations had been underway at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar since June 20.

Pradhan’s resignation was one of the key demands raised by the protesters. The agitation was called off hours after his resignation letter was submitted to the Prime Minister.

Following the resignation, the Centre assigned the additional charge of the Education Ministry to Pralhad Joshi, who continues to hold the Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution portfolios.

Continue Reading

India News

Parliament to take up anti-paper leak amendment bill, MSME reforms in Monsoon Session today

Parliament is set for a key legislative day as the Lok Sabha considers amendments to the anti-paper leak law and the Rajya Sabha discusses bills related to national honour and MSME reforms.

Published

on

Parliament

Parliament is set for an important day of legislative business on Tuesday, with both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha scheduled to take up key bills covering public examinations, national honour and the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) sector.

The Lok Sabha is expected to consider amendments to the law aimed at preventing unfair practices in public examinations, while the Rajya Sabha will deliberate on legislation related to national honour and reforms in the MSME framework.

Lok Sabha to consider Public Examinations Amendment Bill

Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh is scheduled to move the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 for consideration and passage in the Lok Sabha.

The proposed legislation seeks to amend the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024.

The House will begin proceedings with the Question Hour. Later, several Union ministers, including Jitin Prasada, Ram Nath Thakur, Nityanand Rai, SP Singh Baghel, BL Verma, Bandi Sanjay Kumar and Pabitra Margherita, are slated to lay papers on the table.

Rajya Sabha to discuss national honour, MSME bills

In the Rajya Sabha, the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026 will come up for further consideration. Home Minister Amit Shah is expected to move the bill for passage after a discussion that followed a motion introduced by Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai on Monday.

The Upper House will also witness the introduction of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026 by Union Minister Jitan Ram Majhi.

According to the proposed legislation, the amendments seek to strengthen the mechanism for addressing delayed payments, facilitate the enforcement of arbitral awards and provide states with greater flexibility in deciding the composition of Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Councils.

NDA leaders attend ‘Mangal Milan’ meeting

Ahead of the day’s parliamentary proceedings, senior NDA leaders, including Amit Shah, Rajnath Singh and Nirmala Sitharaman, arrived for the alliance’s ‘Mangal Milan’ meeting.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com