English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Record for US President: Tears Multilateral Deal Then Publicly Endorses Torture

Published

on

Record for US President: Tears Multilateral Deal Then Publicly Endorses Torture

~By Saeed Naqvi

In the Trump multiplex, three shows are on simultaneously. First, the stages between the announcement of withdrawal from the deal and real withdrawal – how signatories respond at each step. That is one play. Without the US to lean on, will Britain ever countenance a grouping of which Germany is the most muscular member? Riveting stuff.

Second, consequences on West Asia. And finally, sauce for Iranian goose is not sauce for the North Korean gander. Nail biting suspense for the audience because no one will know what turn the three narratives will take.

Those smacking their lips at the prospect of Europe drifting away from the US, into another lap, would do well to delay celebrations. True, Donald Trump has just handed them money for jam by withdrawing from the Iran Nuclear Deal, but as I have said above, between announcement and actual withdrawal there is time for a slip.

Almost on cue, Israel has provocatively sought to escalate the Syrian conflict by attacking what it says are Iranian assets. Israel must have been very peeved at Iran protégé Hezbullah’s Hasan Nasrallah administer an electoral one-two on the chins of Tel Aviv and Riyadh. After this week’s elections in Lebanon, he is indomitable in the country’s politics. He fulfills one of the laws of nature: he whom Washington opposes must win.

The other big reversal for the US led alliance is Syria itself. Iran was beginning to loom menacingly over Riyadh and Tel Aviv. Does Washington’s withdrawal from the deal bring Iran down a few notches? Or quite the opposite happens? Iran looks dignified. Trump it is who has bartered away American trust. He is replacing measured policy with caprice and impulse.

President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry sought to address the West Asian scene differently. Their world view was at a variance from Trump’s “non world view”.

The Obama-Kerry approach to the Iran deal was conditioned by serious nuclear concerns, ofcourse. But it was also a function of re prioritizing US role in world affairs in the context of China’s rise. The “pivot to Asia”, in their conception, required a more “hands on”, focused attention to the Asia-Pacific region. They placed the Korean Peninsula in that framework. Diplomacy would advance US interests but without risking strategic alliances.

Having inadvertently enhanced Iranian stature by dismantling Taliban in Afghanistan (with Iranian help, let’s remember) and Saddam Hussain in Iraq, the nuclear deal was one of the ways to manage Iranian power.

The deal had conferred legitimacy on the power structure in Tehran. A new balance of power in West Asia had become feasible. Tehran, Tel Aviv, Ankara, Riyadh, Cairo, would be part of this pentagonal balance of power.

The Palestinian Peace process, Syria’s civil war, Yemen, money spinner for arms merchants but a diplomatic disaster  all demanded American attention on a daily basis. This stalled the crucial “pivot”.

Obama and Kerry sought to place Tel Aviv, Riyadh and others in the same tent as Iran. This was anathema to Benjamin Netanyahu and Mohammad bin Salman. There was a frenetic stamping of feet at this prospect.

They were encouraged from the “New Cons” lobby parked in Washington think tanks, campuses, media and sundry Zionist groups, that Israeli-Palestinian was no longer the West Asia’s core conflict. It had been superseded by the Shia Sunni schism. This was now the basic faultline conditioning West Asian affairs. “No one talks of the Palestinian issue these days” remarked a very old but alert Henry Kissinger during a talk at the Nobel Academy in Oslo two years ago.

The issue which underpinned Arab unity until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990-91 was Palestine. Thereafter, Iran remained a thorn in the sides of regimes where the street was sensitive to the Palestinian tragedy – Egypt, Jordan, for instance. How did Iran aggravate the situation? Sustained focus on the Palestinian issue during Friday prayer sermons by the supreme leader in Tehran were routine. The agitation in the Arab street, and the basement, in response to these sermons gathered further strength in direct proportion to disturbing news from Gaza or the West Bank. It was continuous crisis management.

Swollen ranks of the Muslim Brotherhood would cause Hosni Mubarak to go running to the Saudi King who opened his coffers for mosques and radio stations in Egypt which propagated exactly the political Islam which Saudi investments were supposed to quell.

Cairo’s discomfiture was a source of anxiety to Tel Aviv too: the Egyptian regime, under the American yoke, was well disposed towards Israel. But the Muslim Brotherhood’s growing links with Gaza were disturbing.

For the international community to remain consistently focused on the Shia-Sunni divide, the Palestinian issue must be placed under a haze. With their combined clout, Tel Aviv and Riyadh succeeded in shifting focus to Shia perfidy against Israel and Saudi Arabia. Remember, how livid Netanyahu was with Obama? Totally ignoring the US President, he sailed above his head to address the US Congress.

There was an ironical twist to the tale. Excessive focus on the Shia Sunni divide, quite unintentionally brought anachronistic Wahabism under global searchlights. This is one of the reasons for the Saudi Crown Prince’s impatient and risky gallop towards modernization.

If the Israeli-Saudi duet considers Donald Trump a Godsend, the partners better investigate such qualities as Trump’s attention span, his intellectual stamina. Can he stand by impulsive decisions until they acquire the outlines of policy? He announced he was leaving Afghanistan, then ordered a military surge in that country. High appointees have been in and out of Trump’s rotating door with such rapidity that it is something of a world record. What becomes of the CIA Director-to-be Gina Haspal, celebrated torture expert, will be watched with interest. His chilling endorsement of Haspel is in words that no American President, no “leader of the free world” would have uttered in his wildest nightmare. He made one’s hair stand: “Torture works” he repeated with cold deliberation “Torture does work”.

Latest world news

UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper visits India to strengthen bilateral partnership

UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper held high-level meetings in New Delhi during her first official visit to India, underscoring efforts to deepen cooperation in trade, security, technology and regional stability.

Published

on

UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper visited New Delhi for her first official trip to India since assuming office, holding key meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar as both countries seek to deepen cooperation across trade, security and strategic sectors.

The visit comes at a significant time in India-UK relations, with both governments working toward the implementation of their recently concluded trade agreement while also expanding collaboration in areas such as technology, climate action, supply chains and regional security.

Focus on trade and strategic cooperation

During her engagements in New Delhi, Cooper discussed ways to strengthen the comprehensive strategic partnership between the two countries. Conversations also touched on accelerating the implementation of the India-UK trade agreement and enhancing economic cooperation.

Her visit followed recent discussions between Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and UK Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle regarding the rollout of the bilateral trade pact.

New initiatives announced

India and the UK also announced fresh cooperation initiatives during the visit, including the launch of a Critical Minerals Global Supply Chain Observatory aimed at strengthening collaboration on critical minerals and supply-chain resilience.

Officials described the initiative as an important step in expanding cooperation in emerging strategic sectors and supporting resilient global supply chains.

Addressing global challenges

Apart from bilateral issues, discussions covered wider global concerns, including regional stability, economic disruptions arising from international conflicts and maritime security. The visit reflects the growing importance both countries attach to their strategic partnership amid evolving geopolitical challenges.

India and the UK have increasingly broadened cooperation across defence, technology, innovation, clean energy and people-to-people ties, with both sides aiming to further strengthen engagement in the coming years.

Fact-check assessment

The core angle—Yvette Cooper’s first official visit to India, meetings with PM Modi and S. Jaishankar, focus on trade, security, strategic cooperation and the launch of new bilateral initiatives—is supported by multiple current reports and appears factually sound.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump says India-US trade deal likely soon, calls PM Modi a good friend

Donald Trump has expressed confidence that India and the United States will soon finalize a trade agreement, while praising Prime Minister Narendra Modi and highlighting ongoing bilateral negotiations.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump has expressed confidence that the United States and India will reach a trade agreement in the near future, even as discussions continue amid concerns over potential new tariffs. Trump also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing him as a good friend and highlighting the strong relationship between the two leaders.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said he expects the two countries to finalize a deal and pointed to his personal rapport with Prime Minister Modi. He said the relationship between Washington and New Delhi remains strong and that ongoing negotiations are moving toward an agreement.

The remarks come shortly after a US trade delegation concluded discussions in India on an interim bilateral trade arrangement. According to Indian officials, the talks were conducted in a cooperative atmosphere, with both sides reaffirming their commitment to a mutually beneficial agreement aimed at strengthening economic ties.

During the interaction, Trump also repeated his criticism of India’s past tariff policies, arguing that India had imposed high duties on American goods for many years. He claimed recent US trade measures were intended to address what he views as an imbalance in the trading relationship.

His comments come days after the US administration proposed additional tariffs on imports from India and several other economies under a separate trade investigation related to forced-labour concerns. The proposal remains under review and has become one of the issues running alongside broader trade negotiations between the two countries.

Despite the tariff dispute, both governments have continued negotiations. Recent statements from officials on both sides suggest that substantial progress has already been made on several aspects of the proposed agreement, with discussions focused on resolving the remaining issues.

The United States is one of India’s largest trading partners, and a bilateral agreement is expected to further expand trade and investment flows between the two countries. Trump’s latest remarks are being seen as a sign that both sides remain committed to finding common ground despite ongoing trade disagreements.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

India considers tax relief to attract foreign investors amid Iran war impact

India is evaluating tax incentives, including a possible capital gains tax exemption on government securities for foreign investors, to support capital inflows amid economic pressures linked to the Iran war.

Published

on

India is considering a set of measures aimed at attracting more foreign investment as the ongoing Iran war continues to create pressure on the country’s economy, according to reports citing government sources. One of the key proposals under discussion is the removal of capital gains tax on investments made by foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) in government securities.

The move comes at a time when geopolitical tensions in West Asia have pushed up global oil prices, weakened investor sentiment and increased pressure on the Indian rupee. India, which imports a significant share of its crude oil requirements, has been among the countries closely monitoring the economic fallout from the conflict.

Government exploring ways to boost capital inflows

Officials are reportedly evaluating tax-related incentives to make Indian debt markets more attractive to overseas investors. The proposed exemption on capital gains from government securities is aimed at encouraging foreign portfolio investment and supporting capital inflows during a period of heightened global uncertainty.

The government is seeking to counter the impact of foreign capital outflows that have intensified amid concerns over the Iran conflict and its implications for energy markets and global economic growth.

Rupee and markets under pressure

Recent weeks have seen increased volatility in financial markets, with foreign investors pulling money out of Indian equities. Analysts have linked part of the pressure on the rupee to rising oil prices and continued overseas investor withdrawals.

Market participants believe that measures aimed at attracting foreign investment into government securities could help improve investor confidence and provide support to the domestic currency.

Broader economic concerns

The Iran war has added to concerns about inflation, economic growth and India’s external sector. Higher energy prices can increase import costs and put pressure on inflation, while sustained foreign capital outflows may affect financial market stability.

While no final decision has been announced, discussions on easing tax rules for foreign investors reflect the government’s efforts to strengthen capital inflows and cushion the economy from external shocks.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com