English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Retired IPS officer moves Supreme Court seeking CBI probe into Atiq Ahmed assassination

A retired IPS officer has filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking a CBI probe into the sensational assassination of gangster Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf Ahmed.

Published

on

Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf Ahmed

A retired IPS officer has filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking a CBI probe into the sensational assassination of gangster Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf Ahmed.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by retired IPS officer Amitabh Thakur seeks Apex court directions to the Uttar Pradesh government to transfer the FIR registered against the three assassins of the Ahmed brothers to the CBI as it argued that there’s a possibility that the attackers may be killed while in judicial custody and there’s also a risk of evidence tampering.

Thakur in his plea urged an immediate need to act in the case and said that several facts and figures make the murder of Atiq and Ashraf extremely unique and a matter of larger public interest, which has many important ramifications for public life, governance and the entire edifice of law and justice.

The ex-IPS officer noted that Atiq Ahmed, Mukhtar Ansari and certain other selective gangsters, were repeatedly praying for their lives on social media and hence knew they were being targeted, adding that everything about the killing Atiq Ahmed and his brother seems sketchy, fishy and highly suspicious.

The plea claimed that its quite obvious that the plot to kill Atiq and his brother may very well be a state-sponsored exercise, “where the high and mighty might be involved, for all kinds of nefarious purposes.”

Read Also: CBI summons Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee in cattle smuggling case

Thakur said the name dropping by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and the manner in which he and his regime selectively targeted a few gangsters clearly revealed that a few people were the real targets of the state government under the current rule.

The petition claimed that every action, whether by the police, the revenue department or by any other department, happened only with a select few like Atiq Ahmed and Mukhtar Ansari, adding that UP CM Yogi Adityanath has created an ‘encounter raj’ regime in the state and openly vouches for and calls for the use of force to take down criminals and gangsters leading to thousands of encounters after BJP came into power.

The plea further said: “The Chief Minister, his ministers and the officials of the state government repeatedly went on releasing data on the number of encounters and the numbers of criminals killed/arrested in this process. It was never officially admitted that these actions were based on any selective or target-based considerations, but it was known to one and all, among the public as also among the officials, that the action had to be extremely targeted and selective, where the prime targets were to be Mukhtar Ansari and Atiq Ahmed and in the process.”

Atiq Ahmed and his brother Khalid Azeem alias Ashraf Ahmed were gunned down in front of the Uttar Pradesh police while they were on their way for a medical checkup at a hospital in Prayagraj on Saturday night.

In a mafia-style shooting, three gunmen, posing as journalists, shot and killed the Ahmad brothers on camera and later surrendered before the police.

Following the killing, the Union Home Ministry said it will prepare a list of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the safety of journalists.

The shooters, who were whisked away to an undisclosed location, have been identified as Lovlesh Tewari, Sunny Singh and Arun Maurya—all three have a deep criminal background and killed Atiq and his brother to climb the ranks in the criminal underworld, according to the police.

Gangster-politician Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf, had recently been convicted in the Umesh Pal kidnapping and murder case.

On Thursday, Atiq’s 19-year-old son Asad Ahmad, was shot dead in an encounter by the Special Task Force (STF) of the Uttar Pradesh Police in Jhansi.

The Uttar Pradesh government on Sunday announced that a three-member judicial commission will probe the gangster’s brazen killing.

Kerala students protest saffronisation of NCERT textbooks; police use tear gas, water cannons to disperse them | WATCH

Mamata Banerjee demands Amit Shah’s resignation after his Trinamool Congress will collapse by 2025 remark

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com