English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

NRC: Significant omissions surface, Opposition-BJP clash; Rajnath says don’t politicise

Published

on

NRC: Significant omissions surface, Opposition-BJP clash; Rajnath says don’t politicise

The draft of Assam’s National Register of Citizens, although still to be finalised, came under question with some significant and unlikely lapses and omissions coming to light.

Among the 40 lakh people who did not find their names in the complete draft National Register of Citizens published on Monday, News18 reported, was the family of India’s former President late Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed’s brother.

Ziauddin, the son of Fakhruddin’s brother Lt Ekramuddin Ali Ahmed family hailing from Rangia, in Kamrup district of Assam expressed shock that none of the family members’ names were on the list. He said that he would try to find documents to make it to the NRC list.

“I am the nephew of former President of India Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, and my name is missing in the NRC, since my father’s name is not in the legacy data, we are little worried about it,” Ziauddin Ali Ahmed was quoted as saying.

Another name missing in the NRC list was Mohd Azmal Hoque, a retired soldier from Assam who had served in the military for 30 years and retired on September 30, 2016, reported DNA. Hoque was asked by Foreign Tribunal to prove his citizenship in September 2017 and when the final draft was published on Monday, July 30, his name was missing.

He had earlier told DNA: “After a six-month military training, I have served the Army in the technical department from various places. I was at the LoC in Punjab’s Khemkaran Sector and Kalaigaon, at Tawang on the Indo-China border, at Lucknow, at Kota. I also had a stint at the College of Defence Management at Secunderabad,” said Hoque.

He served in a non-combat role, in the computer and networking team and trained at Secunderabad 1ENE Training Centre.

On Monday, Shailesh, Registrar General and Census Commissioner, said each and every person whose name hasn’t featured will be given an individual letter to make and establish claims.

“The process has been completely transparent, fair, objective and meticulously carried out. Adequate opportunity to all applicants were given,” said Shailesh and emphasised that this is not the final list.

Assam is the first Indian state where the NRC is being updated after 1951, with March 24, 1971 as the cut-off date, to include names of “genuine Indian citizens”.

The NRC seeks to address the problem of illegal migrants which has been a serious issue in the State, leading to protests, movements and violence. However, the manner and criteria for judging who is Indian national and who isn’t is problematic. Persons and families who have not been resident in one place or state would be unable to establish their citizenship.

For instance, a person born in Jharkhand, educated in Kolkata or Delhi and then settled in Guwahati would likely be unable to prove his citizenship.

The issue rocked the Parliament for the second day on Tuesday, after forcing an early adjournment of the Rajya Sabha on Monday.

While Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh on Monday had said the sensitive issue should not be politicised, pointing out it was being carried out under the aegis of the Supreme Court, BJP president Amit Shah, speaking in Rajya Sabha on Tuesday, sought to score political points, saying it was BJP which had the courage to prepare the NRC.

Rajnath Singh had said: “The NRC exercise is being carried out under the aegis of the Supreme Court of India; it is a sensitive issue and I would request all of you not to politicise it. Everyone will have full opportunity to file claims/objections as per provision in the law. Only after the disposal of claims and objections, will the final NRC be published.”

On Tuesday, according to ANI, BJP President Amit Shah said in Rajya Sabha: “Rajiv Gandhi signed Assam accord in 1985, which was similar to NRC. They did not have courage to implement it, we did.”

Protests followed and after continuing ruckus on the issue, Rajya Sabha was adjourned for the day a little after 1 pm.

While the Opposition has been protesting the “injustice” to 40 lakh persons left out from the NRC and some, especially Trinamool chief and Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, have demanded its withdrawal, the BJP hit back saying it would bring out a NRC for Bengal on the lines of the one for Assam if it is voted to power.

West Bengal BJP president Dilip Ghosh said on Monday that the National Register of Mr Citizens will be published in Bengal on the lines of the one in Assam if his party is voted to power in the state.

“If we (BJP) are voted to power in Bengal then we too will implement NRC in Bengal. We will send back illegal citizens to Bangladesh. Tough days are ahead, we will not tolerate any illegal immigrants in Bengal,” West Bengal BJP president Dilip Ghosh was quoted by NDTV as saying.

India News

PM Modi takes a dig at Congress after zero wins in MLC bypolls

Prime Minister Narendra Modi took a swipe at Congress after the party failed to win a single seat in Legislative Council by-elections across four states. He highlighted that the elections were conducted using ballot papers.

Published

on

PM Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi took a swipe at the Congress on Wednesday after the party failed to win any seats in Legislative Council by-elections held across four states. Referring to the use of ballot papers in the elections, the Prime Minister questioned the party’s performance in the contests.

The by-elections covered 28 Legislative Council seats across Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar and Karnataka. Congress contested 12 seats, including four that it had previously held, but failed to secure a victory in any of them, according to the reported results.

The setback was particularly notable in Karnataka, where Congress is in power but did not win any of the four Legislative Council seats contested in the state.

What PM Modi said about the MLC election results

In a post on X, Modi referred to the elections held across the four states and highlighted that ballot papers had been used for voting.

“MLC elections in 28 seats across 4 big states – Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar and Karnataka. Elections held using ballot papers. Guess how many seats Congress won?” the Prime Minister wrote.

He accompanied the post with a monocle emoji, adding a mocking tone to his question about the party’s performance.

The reference to ballot papers came amid the Congress’s broader objections to electronic voting machines and its demands for a return to paper ballots. Modi’s post drew attention to the party’s failure to win any of the seats it contested in these particular elections.

Congress draws a blank across four states

The Legislative Council by-elections covered constituencies in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar and Karnataka.

Congress contested 12 of the 28 seats but could not secure a win. Four of the seats it contested had previously been held by the party.

Karnataka emerged as a significant setback for Congress, which governs the state. The party failed to win any of the four seats contested there.

The overall outcome provided the context for Modi’s remarks, which linked the election results to the use of ballot papers rather than electronic voting machines.

Why the ballot paper reference matters

Congress has raised concerns about the use of electronic voting machines and called for a return to ballot papers. Modi’s post drew a contrast between those demands and the party’s performance in elections conducted using paper ballots.

However, the results of these Legislative Council by-elections relate to the specific seats contested across the four states. They do not, by themselves, establish any broader conclusion about the integrity of other elections or the merits of different voting systems.

The Prime Minister’s remarks were a political swipe at Congress following its performance in the MLC bypolls.

Continue Reading

India News

Election Commission orders transfers ahead of 2027 polls in 5 states

The Election Commission has directed five states heading for Assembly elections in 2027 to transfer election-related officials posted in their home districts or those who meet the prescribed tenure criteria. The states have been asked to submit compliance reports by November 30, 2026.

Published

on

Election Commission of India

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has directed five states to transfer officials directly involved in election-related duties ahead of the 2027 Assembly elections. The directive applies to Goa, Manipur, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, where the terms of the existing legislative assemblies are due to expire next year.

In a letter dated October 27, 2026, the Commission instructed the chief secretaries and chief electoral officers of the five states to implement its transfer and posting guidelines. The exercise covers officials posted in their home districts and those who have completed, or are due to complete, three years in a district during the past four years, subject to the prescribed cut-off dates.

The Commission has also set November 30, 2026, as the deadline for submitting compliance reports on the action taken.

Which officials will be covered by the transfer rules?

The guidelines cover district-level administrative officers directly connected with election management, including District Election Officers, Returning Officers, Assistant Returning Officers, Additional District Magistrates, Sub-Divisional Magistrates, tehsildars and Block Development Officers.

Divisional commissioners and municipal commissioners are also covered by the directive.

In the police department, the rules apply to specified officers from the rank of inspector and sub-inspector to senior officers, including those at the range level. The guidelines also cover designated officers in the excise and transport departments.

The Commission’s instructions are intended to ensure that officials directly involved in conducting elections do not remain posted in their home districts or continue in districts where they have served for an extended period.

Three-year tenure rule and cut-off dates

The Commission has prescribed different cut-off dates for calculating the three-year tenure in the five states.

For Goa, Manipur, Punjab and Uttarakhand, the cut-off date is March 31, 2027. For Uttar Pradesh, it is May 31, 2027.

Officials who have completed three years in a district during the preceding four years, or who will complete that period by the applicable cut-off date, are covered by the transfer requirements.

The guidelines also specify that promotions to posts within the same district will be counted while calculating the three-year tenure. Services rendered at the state headquarters during the preceding four years are not to be included in the calculation, even if the headquarters is located within the same revenue district.

Officials cannot return to previous election postings

The Commission has also directed that designated election officials must not be posted back to, or allowed to continue in, the Assembly constituency or district where they served during the previous Assembly election or a subsequent by-election, as applicable.

This provision covers District Election Officers, Returning Officers, Assistant Returning Officers and specified police personnel.

The rules form part of the Commission’s instructions governing the posting of officials responsible for election-related work in the five states.

November 30 deadline for compliance reports

The chief secretaries and directors general of police of the five states have been directed to submit compliance reports to the Election Commission by November 30, 2026.

The reports are intended to communicate the action taken by the respective state administrations to implement the transfer guidelines.

The directive comes ahead of the scheduled end of the current Assembly terms in the five states in 2027. The terms of the Goa, Manipur, Punjab and Uttarakhand Assemblies are due to expire in March, while the Uttar Pradesh Assembly’s term ends in May.

The transfer instructions mark a step in the Election Commission’s preparations for the next round of Assembly elections in these states.

Continue Reading

India News

Karnataka MLC election results 2026: NDA wins all 4 Seats

The BJP-JD(S) alliance won all four seats in the Karnataka Legislative Council elections held on October 23, 2026. The BJP secured three seats, while the JD(S) won one, dealing a setback to the ruling Congress.

Published

on

BJP

The BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) has won all four seats in the Karnataka Legislative Council elections, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) securing three seats and its ally Janata Dal (Secular), or JD(S), winning one.

The results are a setback for the ruling Congress, which failed to win any of the four seats contested in the elections held on October 23.

The contest was closely watched as a test of coordination between the BJP and JD(S), which fought the elections as alliance partners. The outcome also drew attention to the Congress’s support among voters in teachers’ and graduates’ constituencies.

BJP wins three seats, JD(S) secures one

The BJP won the North-East Teachers’ constituency, the South-East Graduates’ constituency and the West Graduates’ constituency. The JD(S), meanwhile, won the Bengaluru Teachers’ constituency.

The Bengaluru Teachers’ constituency contest was particularly significant because the JD(S) candidate, A P Ranganath, defeated sitting Congress MLC Puttanna. Ranganath had previously contested the constituency against Puttanna, who had switched to the Congress before the previous Assembly elections.

The results demonstrated the electoral outcome of the BJP-JD(S) alliance in these four constituencies. However, the results alone do not establish how the outcome will affect the parties’ performance in future state-wide elections.

BJP leader targets Congress government

Reacting to the results, BJP leader Ashok Gowda described the outcome as a success for the NDA and criticised the Congress government in Karnataka.

“This is a success for the NDA and all the narratives spread by the Congress have been exposed,” Gowda told media.

He also alleged that the Congress government had failed in the state and claimed that the results reflected public dissatisfaction with the ruling party.

These remarks were Gowda’s political assessment of the election outcome and should be understood as statements by a BJP leader.

Election tests BJP-JD(S) coordination

The elections were seen as an important test of whether the BJP and JD(S) could coordinate their campaigns and consolidate support behind their respective alliance candidates.

The JD(S) was allocated the Bengaluru Teachers’ constituency, while the BJP contested the other three seats. The alliance’s victory across all four constituencies gave both parties a favourable result in this round of Legislative Council elections.

The Congress, which governs Karnataka, did not win any of the four seats. Nevertheless, the Legislative Council results should be distinguished from a state Assembly election, as the contests involved specific teachers’ and graduates’ constituencies rather than the entire electorate.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com