In a surprise declaration on Saturday, US President Donald Trump announced that India and Pakistan had agreed to a “full and immediate ceasefire”, attributing the breakthrough to an overnight mediation effort by the United States.
Taking to Truth Social, his social media platform, Trump posted:
“After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a Full and Immediate Ceasefire. Congratulations to both countries on using common sense and great intelligence. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
Pakistan’s Deputy PM confirmed the news. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said the ceasefire effective 5 pm today (May 10) came about when the Pakistan DGMO called his Indian counterpart at 3.35 pm and discussed stopping firing by sea, air and land from both sides. Another call between the DGMOs will happen at noon on Monday, Misri said.
The dramatic tweet instantly sparked confusion, curiosity, and cautious optimism across diplomatic circles. While Trump offered no additional evidence or official documentation to back the claim, his statement fueled intense speculation about potential behind-the-scenes negotiations.
However, sources in both capitals did acknowledge that backchannel communications between the two nuclear-armed neighbours had been underway in recent weeks, focusing on de-escalation along the Line of Control (LoC) and the Punjab sector.
A senior Indian official, speaking anonymously, remarked: “We are not aware of any formal US-led mediation. However, if a ceasefire understanding has been reached, it would be part of ongoing bilateral efforts—not an outcome of an official US initiative.”
Meanwhile, in Islamabad, officials were more restrained but did not deny the possibility of a ceasefire agreement. Some local media hinted at an impending military directive halting retaliatory shelling along the LoC.
While Trump’s assertion was met with skepticism from many quarters, especially given his history of dramatic pronouncements, it nevertheless succeeded in drawing global attention to the simmering tensions between the two South Asian nations.
Diplomatic observers were quick to note that Trump’s tweet marked the first public mention of any recent ceasefire deal, suggesting that he may have been informed by unofficial channels — or may have jumped the gun.
“This is classic Trump — bold, vague, and attention-grabbing,” said a former US diplomat. “Even if talks were happening, announcing them this way is bound to complicate things.”
India and Pakistan have a long history of border skirmishes and full-scale conflicts, with numerous ceasefire violations reported annually. A similar ceasefire agreement in 2003 brought temporary relief, but the fragile understanding has frequently broken down.
The recent spike in tensions, particularly following drone activity, cross-border firing, and the Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir, had raised fears of wider escalation. Any agreement to halt hostilities, even if informal, would be a significant step toward preventing civilian casualties and restoring stability.
Global reactions were mixed. The United Nations welcomed any move toward de-escalation but refrained from commenting on Trump’s role. Regional analysts noted that while both nations may quietly welcome a pause in hostilities, the lack of a formal joint announcement left the picture incomplete.