English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Bulandshahr violence: three arrested for cow slaughter, cop killers at large

Published

on

Bulandshahr violence

On a day when over 80 retired civil servants criticised Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath for directing police to focus on cow slaughter rather than those who murdered police inspector Subodh Kumar Singh in the violence in Bulandshahr, the state police – as if establishing their point – claimed to have nabbed the main culprits of the cow slaughter incident about a fortnight ago, on Dec 3.

Along with the police inspector, a 20-year-old man who was also named as accused in the violence, was also killed in the violence that followed news of cow slaughter in the area.

Along with three nabbed on charges of cow slaughter, the police have arrested two others in connection with mob violence. The main accused in the cop’s murder, Yogesh Raj, district chief of Bajrang Dal, a Hindutva outfit affiliated to RSS, is still at large.

Also missing since the incident is another accused Shikhar Agrawal, a leader of the BJP Yuva Morcha in the area and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s former Syana town president Upendra Raghav.

Yogesh Raj even posted a video claiming he is innocent. Shikhar Aggarwal gave an interview to a news channel, but the police have not been able to track down either of them.

It was these circumstances that prompted the former bureaucrats –former Lt Governor of Delhi Najeeb Jung included – to also make a request to the Allahabad high court to “take suo motu cognizance of this incident and order a judicial enquiry supervised by them to uncover the true facts, expose the political collusion, fix responsibility and recommend action”. (See full letter below)

The police, focusing on alleged cow slaughter, said they arrested three persons near a local animal market in Bulandshahr after they intercepted a vehicle carrying the suspects based on a tip-off.

The arrested were Nadeem, Raees and Kala, all of the Syana region, police said. A fourth accused, Haroon, managed to flee.

A vehicle, double-barrelled licensed gun, a meat chopper, two knives and a butcher’s wooden block were recovered from them. The items were allegedly used in committing the crime.

The police even claimed that the accused were on course to committing another cow slaughter when they were arrested.

Circle Officer Syana Raghvendra Kumar Mishra said one of the accused, Kala, had in the past spent time in jail over cow slaughter, reported The Hindu. Asked about the alleged motive of the accused in committing the crime, since the BJP government had termed the discovery of the carcasses a ‘conspiracy’, Mishra said things were still being probed.

According to the Bulandshahr police, on the night of December 2-3, two accused Haroon and Nadeem used their weapons to shoot dead three cows in Mahav village in Syana. They then chopped the cows and distributed the meat among themselves, with Haroon carrying away the hide and some meat in his car.

They left the carcasses and the remaining meat in the sugar cane fields, a police statement said.

This was not the only cow slaughter committed by the accused, police said. On the night of December 1, they “hunted a cow” in the Naya forests nearby. The cow was allegedly shot with a licensed gun before being slaughtered, and distributed among the culprits.

On the complaint of Bajrang Dal member Yogesh Raj, police had registered a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1995 and Section 295 of the IPC.

Significantly, none of these persons were named in the original complaint of cow slaughter filed by Yogesh Raj, the Bajrang Dal leader who is the main accused in the killing of inspector Singh, reported NDTV.

There is also no evidence against four others initially arrested in the cow slaughter case, police sources told NDTV. Two of the four men – Sarfuddin and Sajid – were named in the FIR by Yogesh Raj, key accused in the incidents of mob violence and the murder of the inspector. The police say they will move court for the release of these men.

As for mob violence, the Special Task Force (STF) has arrested two more in the case – Sachin Singh or Cobra, 21, and Johnny Chaudhary, 19 – taking the total number of people in custody to 19. But the family of the Inspector says the real killers are still scot-free.

The police so far have named 27 people in the First Information Report and cases have been filed against another 50-60 unidentified persons for violence.

Evidence being destroyed: slain cop’s wife

Rajini Singh, inspector Singh’s wife, alleged that evidence in the case has been destroyed. Speaking to NDTV, she said, “They are protecting their own people and destroying all the evidence one by one. Nobody is there to tell what exactly happened there on that day.” She did not name anyone in particular.

Abhishek Singh, her son, stated that the politicians were protecting the accused. “What else explains the delay in arresting Yogesh Raj. What’s stopping the police? I just hope that my father’s murder doesn’t end up as a file covered in dust,” he said.

The family recently met UP chief minister Adityanath, who had initially said that the inspector’s death was an accident. “I met Yogi ji and told him about my pain. He assured me that my husband’s killers will be arrested soon. But the killers are still roaming free? I want to ask Yogi ji, why haven’t they been arrested?” she said.

Full text of open letter written by former civil servants:

We are a group of retired civil servants from the All India and Central Services who, having spent long years in the service of the Constitution of India, have come together to express ourselves on issues of governance and public policy that have a bearing on constitutional principles, conduct and ethics. Since June 2017, when we first came together, we have spoken out on several occasions when we felt that constitutional values were under threat and that it was incumbent on us to voice our concerns publicly. As a group we have no affiliations with any political party nor do we subscribe to any ideology other than the values enshrined in the Constitution.

It is a measure of the rapid erosion of constitutional values that we, as a group, have felt a compelling need to speak out as many as nine times in the last eighteen months. The pace of erosion has been frightening and with each slip we seem to sink further into a lawless abyss.

The mob violence in Bulandshahr in Uttar Pradesh (U.P), on 3 December 2018, instigated and engineered with malicious intent, which led to the cold blooded murder of a police officer brave enough to step forward single-handedly to pacify the mob, marks the most dangerous turn yet in the direction taken by the politics of hate in recent times. It shows that in India’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, fundamental principles of governance, of constitutional ethics and of humane social conduct stand perverted. The Chief Minister of the state acts as a high priest of the agenda of bigotry and majoritarian supremacy – an agenda which now seems to take precedence over everything else.

Why is this incident such a frightening indicator of the complete collapse of constitutional values? This is not the first instance of a situation intentionally created to foment communal tension. The history of U.P. is replete with such instances. This is not the first time that a policeman has been killed by a frenzied mob. This is also not the first time that the politics of cow protection has been used as a means of isolating and cornering the Muslim community and deepening the social divide.

All this we have seen before but, so far, we had the confidence that whenever a political party actually forms a Government it keeps its partisan political agenda at bay and begins to exercise power with a sense of responsibility so as to gain wider political acceptability. The Bulandshahr episode, which follows a succession of events aimed at isolating and intimidating Muslim communities in U.P., shows that, under Yogi Adityanath, that confidence is misplaced and that hooliganism and thuggery have been mainstreamed into governance not just to intimidate minorities but to teach a lesson to anyone, including police personnel and others in the administration, who dare to be even handed in their approach to minority communities.

While it may be premature to come to conclusions about the murder of Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh before the investigations are over, there is no doubt that there was nothing spontaneous about the violence that led to his killing, nor is there any doubt as to who the political elements were that aided and abetted the violence. This was a deliberate attempt to display majoritarian muscle and send a message to the Muslim communities living in the region that they have to live in fear, accept their subordinate status and conform to the cultural diktats of the majority community.

Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh’s reputation of being independent and even-handed and his refusal to act in haste on the complaint of illegal cow slaughter that allegedly took place under his watch, was obviously seen as defiance of the majoritarian will. The local BJP and Sangh Parivar elements had already complained about his anti-Hindu conduct and sought his transfer. He was an impediment to their communal plans and had to go. Much as the Chief Minister may try to mislead by calling it an accident, this was murder with intent. It was murder most foul.

As horrifying as the brazen, daylight murder of a courageous police officer is the response of the administration to the event. The Chief Minister refuses to acknowledge the gravity of the incident and its communal intent, condemn the perpetrators of violence or direct the police to take action against them but instead asks them to focus attention on those responsible for illegal cow slaughter. The police authorities themselves draw an equivalence between the killing of a police officer and the illegal slaughter of cows and claim that unless both crimes are investigated together it will not be possible to come to any conclusions about the violence of the mob and the murder of a colleague.

Ample videographed evidence exists to show that those engaged in violence and their leaders, as well as those who egged them on, are allowed to roam scot-free while, at the same time, alleged cow killers, against whom not a shred of evidence exists, are taken into custody, just because they are Muslims. Three of the main accused in the mob violence leading to the death of the police officer flaunt their affiliations to the Sangh Parivar and one of them openly declares that the slain police officer was corrupt, friendly with Muslims and anti-Hindu, implying thereby that he deserved his fate.

World over, in any civilized society, the killing of a policeman is a more serious offence than any other crime, because it represents an assault on the very basis of that civilisation. It brooks no tolerance and even the most fractious of social and political groups come together to ensure that the perpetrators of such a crime are given exemplary punishment so that no one ever dares to attack the authority of law. In U.P. on the other hand we are witness to the entire administration, presided over by a Chief Minister who flaunts his bigotry as his badge of identity, preparing the ground not for bringing the perpetrators to book but for protecting them as defenders of faith and culture. This is the Rule of Lawlessness.

Our colleagues in service, in the Police and the Civil Administration appear, with honourable exceptions, to have capitulated readily to this perverted political order. They seem to have forgotten that their primary allegiance is to the Constitution and the Rule of Law, and that their constitutional status provides them an armour of such extraordinary strength that, had they taken steps to check the growing menace of the Hindutva brigade, they could certainly have prevented the outbreak of violence. Instead they not only allowed these hooligans to grow in confidence and gather political strength, they helped them gain impunity in their lawless actions.

Even now if they – the Chief Secretary, the Director General of Police, the Home Secretary, the District Magistrate and the district police authorities – stand together to uncover the insidious political agenda, identify its masterminds and bring the hooligans involved in the violence to book, they stand a chance to redeem their pledge to the Constitution and live up to the expectations that citizens have of the higher civil services.

Our Prime Minister, who is so voluble in his election campaigns and who never tires of telling us of how the Constitution of India is the only holy book he worships, maintains stony silence even as he sees a Chief Minister handpicked by him treat that same Constitution with sheer contempt. It is evident that, for the Sangh Parivar, constitutional morality is of no value and is necessarily subordinate to the ideals of majoritarian supremacy.

Never before in recent history has the politics of hate, division and exclusion been so dominant and the poisonous ideology which informs it penetrated so deep into the body politic. Never before has hate been directed with such calculated intent against minority communities, hate which is nursed, aided and abetted by those in power. Violence has been given social and political sanction and perpetrators of violence have been treated with kid gloves while victims have been punished and harassed.

This is a critical moment and we cannot take it lying down anymore. We call upon all citizens to unite in a crusade against the politics of hate and division – a politics which aims to destroy the fundamental principles on which our Republic is founded. We ask all citizens to whom constitutional values matter to join us in reasserting our sovereignty as citizens to:

  • Demand the resignation of the Chief Minister for his failure to abide by the Constitution to which he has sworn his allegiance. We know that this can happen, if together, we build a groundswell of public opinion by which we hold him accountable for his conduct and compel him to resign.
  • Remind the Chief Secretary, the Director General of Police, the Home Secretary, and all other members of the higher civil services concerned, of their constitutional duty to fearlessly implement the Rule of Law rather than the perverse dictates of their political masters.
  • Request the High Court at Allahabad to take suo motu cognizance of this incident and order a judicial enquiry supervised by them to uncover the true facts, expose the political collusion, fix responsibility and recommend action.
  • Work towards a citizen-led national campaign against the politics of hate and violence – in particular, the structural violence directed against Muslims, Adivasis, Dalits and women – violence which finds sustenance in the structures of political power.
  • Salute Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh for his bravery in standing up for constitutional values and refusing to yield to political pressure even at the cost of his life and for setting an example to his children and the younger generation that values matter more than career success. We also acknowledge and applaud the dignity with which his family has faced this crisis and their quiet resolve to uphold the principles for which Subodh Kumar

Singh sacrificed his life. His martyrdom will not be in vain.

  1. P. Ambrose IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Secretary, Ministry of Shipping & Transport, GoI
  2. L. Bajaj IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Administrative Reforms and Decentralisation Commission, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh
  3. Bala Baskar IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Adviser (Finance), Ministry of External Affairs, GoI
  4. Vappala Balachandran IPS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, GoI
  5. Gopalan Balagopal IAS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  6. Chandrashekhar Balakrishnan IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Coal, GoI
  7. Meeran C. Borwankar IPS (Retd.) Former DGP, Bureau of Police Research and Development, GoI
  8. Ravi Budhiraja IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, GoI
  9. Sundar Burra IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
  10. Kalyani Chaudhuri IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  11. Anna Dani IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
  12. Surjit K. Das IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Uttarakhand
  13. Vibha Puri Das IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, GoI
  14. R. DasguptaIAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Food Corporation of India, GoI
  15. Nareshwar Dayal IFS (Retd.)Former Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs and former High Commissioner to the United Kingdom
  16. Pradeep K. Deb IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Deptt. Of Sports, GoI
  17. Nitin Desai IES (Retd.) Former Secretary and Chief Economic Adviser, Ministry of Finance, GoI
  18. Keshav Desiraju IAS (Retd.) Former Health Secretary, GoI
  19. G. Devasahayam IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Govt. of Haryana
  20. Sushil Dubey IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Sweden
  21. P. Fabian IFS (Retd.)Former Ambassador to Italy
  22. Prabhu Ghate IAS (Retd.) Former Addl. Director General, Department of Tourism, GoI
  23. Arif Ghauri IRS (Retd.) Former Commissioner of Income Tax, GoI
  24. Gourisankar Ghosh IAS (Retd.) Former Mission Director, National Drinking Water Mission, GoI
  25. Hirak Ghosh IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  26. Tuktuk Ghosh IAS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary and Financial Adviser, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Shipping & Tourism, GoI
  27. Meena Gupta IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, GoI
  28. Ravi Vira Gupta IAS (Retd.) Former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India
  29. Deepa Hari IRS (Resigned)
  30. Vivek Harinarain IAS (Retd.) Govt. of Tamil Nadu
  31. Sajjad HassanIAS (Retd.) Former Commissioner (Planning), Govt. of Manipur
  32. M.A. Ibrahimi IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary (rank), Govt. of Bihar
  33. Kamal Jaswal IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Department of Information Technology, GoI
  34. Jagdish Joshi IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary (Planning), Govt. of Maharashtra
  35. Najeeb Jung IAS (Retd.)Former Lieutenant Governor, Delhi
  36. John Koshy IAS (Retd.)Former State Chief Information Commissioner, West Bengal
  37. Ajai KumarIndian Forest Service (Retd.) Former Director, Ministry of Agriculture, GoI
  38. Arun KumarIAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority, GoI
  39. Brijesh Kumar IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Department of Information Technology, GoI
  40. Harsh ManderIAS (Retd.) Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
  41. Aditi Mehta IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan
  42. Shivshankar Menon IFS (Retd.) Former Foreign Secretary and Former National Security Adviser
  43. Sonalini Mirchandani IFS (Resigned) GoI
  44. Sunil Mitra IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Finance, GoI
  45. Noor Mohammad IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, National Disaster Management Authority, Govt. of India
  46. Deb MukharjiIFS (Retd.) Former High Commissioner to Bangladesh and former Ambassador to Nepal
  47. Shiv Shankar Mukherjee IFS (Retd.)Former High Commissioner to the United Kingdom
  48. Pranab S. Mukhopadhyay IAS (Retd.) Former Director, Institute of Port Management, GoI
  49. NagalswamyIAS (Retd.) Former Principal Accountant General, Tamil Nadu & Kerala
  50. Amitabha PandeIAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Inter-State Council, GoI
  51. Niranjan Pant IA&AS (Retd.) Former Deputy Comptroller & Auditor General of India
  52. Alok PertiIAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Coal, GoI
  53. R. Raghunandan IAS (Retd.) Former Joint Secretary, Ministry of Panchayati Raj, GoI
  54. K. Raghupathy IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Staff Selection Commission, GoI
  55. P. RaiIAS (Retd.) Former Director General, National Skills Development Agency, GoI
  56. P. Raja IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission
  57. Babu Rajeev IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, GoI
  58. Y. Rao IAS (Retd.)
  59. Julio RibeiroIPS (Retd.) Former Adviser to Governor of Punjab & former Ambassador to Romania
  60. Aruna Roy IAS (Resigned)
  61. Manabendra N. RoyIAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  62. Deepak Sanan IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Adviser (AR) to Chief Minister, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh
  63. Shyam Saran IFS (Retd.)Former Foreign Secretary and Former Chairman, National Security Advisory Board
  64. C. Saxena IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Planning Commission, GoI
  65. Ardhendu SenIAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  66. Aftab Seth IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Japan
  67. Ashok Kumar Sharma IFS (Retd.)Former Ambassador to Finland and Estonia
  68. Navrekha SharmaIFS (Retd.)Former Ambassador to Indonesia
  69. Pravesh Sharma IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
  70. Raju SharmaIAS (Retd.) Former Member, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh
  71. Rashmi Shukla Sharma IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
  72. Ashok Vardhan Shetty IAS (Retd.) Former Vice Chancellor, Indian Maritime University, GoI
  73. Rajdip SinghIPS (Retd.) Former Special Director General, Border Security Force, GoI
  74. Sujatha SinghIFS (Retd.) Former Foreign Secretary, GoI
  75. Tirlochan Singh IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, National Commission for Minorities, GoI
  76. Jawhar Sircar IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Culture, GoI, & former CEO, Prasar Bharati
  77. Narendra Sisodia IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Finance, GoI
  78. Thanksy Thekkekera IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Minorities Development, Govt. of Maharashtra
  79. S.S. Thomas IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary General, National Human Rights Commission
  80. Geetha Thoopal IRAS (Retd.) Former General Manager, Metro Railway, Kolkata
  81. Hindal Tyabji IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary rank, Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir
  82. Ramani Venkatesan IAS (Retd.) Former Director General, YASHADA, Govt. of Maharashtra
  83. Arvind Verma IPS (Resigned)

India News

Delhi Pollution: GRAP IV restrictions to continue in national capital, says Supreme Court

The court also pulled up the Delhi Police over no checkpoints at the borders of the city for checking the pollution measures and said that it was a serious lapse.

Published

on

Delhi Pollution: GRAP IV restrictions to continue in national capital, says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to relax GRAP IV measures in Delhi and ordered the CAQM to consider relaxing norms for students. The apex court observed that several students cannot avail midday meals, online classes and cannot access air purifiers.

The court also pulled up the Delhi Police over no checkpoints at the borders of the city for checking the pollution measures and said that it was a serious lapse. A bench headed by Justice AS Oka stated that they would consider prosecution of the Delhi Police Commissioner under the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) Act for deploying police personnel at only 23 checkpoints, when Stage 4 of the GRAP was implemented.

Earlier, the court has also appointed 13 members from the court as commissioners to check whether the GRAP IV measures are being implemented or not. On Monday, the commissioners submitted their report to the court.

Subsequently, the court told the Delhi government that there were no checkposts at borders of the city and that the ban on trucks entering into the capital was not being followed properly.

The top court bench said that they were informed that no police or government personnel were present at the border checkpoints, and they were only manned by toll collection staff of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. Mentioning that they will direct prosecution against all officials, the court questioned why the police were not directed to take action under Stage IV of the GRAP.

Responding, Advocate Shadan Farasat representing the Delhi government said that the CAQM had issued directions. Consecutively, the court asked him to show what written instructions were given by the state and the central government to the police on November 18. To this, Advocate Farasat said that directions were issued to post police personnel at 23 checkpoints where trucks could enter the city.

The court continued that this was negligence, adding that it will direct CAQM to prosecute the Delhi Police Commissioner.

Continue Reading

India News

Maharashtra elections: Ajit Pawar criticises Sharad Pawar’s decision to field Yugender Pawar against him

Ajit Pawar said that Yugendra is a business person, and he had no connection with politics.

Published

on

Maharashtra elections: Ajit Pawar criticises Sharad Pawar’s decision to field Yugender Pawar against him

After the Maharashtra Assembly Elections results, NCP leader Ajit Pawar criticized NCP faction led by Sharad Pawar for its decision to field his nephew Yugender Pawar against him in the family bastion of Baramati. Ajit Pawar also mentioned that his decision to field wife Sunetra Pawar against his sister Supriya Sule in the Lok Sabha election was a mistake. 

Sharad Pawar led NCP had fielded Yugender Pawar, son of Ajit Pawar’s elder brother Shrinivas Anantrao Pawar, in the Baramati Assembly segment. The constituency was represented by Sharad Pawar for over two decades, followed by Ajit Pawar for over three. In this assembly election, 33-year-old Yugendra Pawar was backed by Sharad Pawar and four-time Baramati MP Supriya Sule. However, Yugender Pawar lost out against his formidable uncle by a margin of over 1 lakh votes.

While addressing the media, Ajit Pawar said that Yugendra is a business person, and he had no connection with politics. He added that there was no reason to field his own nephew against him in the elections.

Earlier in the Lok Sabha elections 2024, Ajit Pawar had fielded his wife Sunetra Pawar against his cousin and Sharad Pawar’s daughter Supriya Sule, who won the contest by a 1.5 lakh votes margin. Later, Ajit Pawar admitted that it was a mistake.

Sharad Pawar had defended the decision to field Yugendra Pawar, mentioning that someone had to contest the polls. He had also said there was no comparison between Ajit Pawar and Yugendra Pawar. 

Notably, a 2023 rebellion led by Ajit Pawar against his uncle split the NCP founded by Sharad Pawar. Since then, the senior Pawar has been fighting to win his party’s name and symbol back. 

Previously In the Lok Sabha election, the veteran had trumped his nephew, with his faction winning 8 seats compared to Ajit Pawar’s score of 1. However this time, the tables turned as NCP (Sharad Pawar) scored 10, but Ajit Pawar’s party won 41.

Continue Reading

India News

Sambhal violence: Samajwadi Party MP among 400 charged in Uttar Pradesh, Opposition blames BJP

The protesters also set some vehicles on fire and threw stones at the police, who used tear gas and batons to disperse the mob.

Published

on

Sambhal violence: Samajwadi Party MP among 400 charged in Uttar Pradesh, Opposition blames BJP

Samajwadi Party MP Ziaur Rahman Barq, and his party colleague Iqbal Mahmood’s son Nawab Suhail Iqbal are among the 400 people who have been charged in the violence over the survey of a mosque in Uttar Pradesh’s Sambhal. Nearly 25 people were arrested for the violence which killed 4 people.

During a court-ordered survey of the Mughal-era Shahi Jama Masjid on Sunday, Sambhal witnessed deadly clashes between the locals and the police. The Shahi Jama Masjid is at the centre of a contentious legal battle over claims that it was built on the site of a Hindu temple.

Reports said that the protesters also set some vehicles on fire and threw stones at the police, who used tear gas and batons to disperse the mob. Considering the situation, the district administration has imposed prohibitory orders and barred the entry of outsiders till November 30.

Around 20 police personnel were also injured and a constable, who suffered an injury to the head, is said to be critical. Addressing a press conference, Superintendent of Police Krishan Kumar said that due to Ziaur Barq’s statement earlier, the situation became worse. He added they were identifying the protestors using drone footage and that the accused would be charged under the stringent National Security Act (NSA).

Reacting to the incident, Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha and Senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi attacked the BJP today, saying the party was responsible for vitiating the situation.

The Congress leader said that the biased and hasty attitude of the state government on the recent dispute in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh is extremely unfortunate. He expressed deepest condolences to those who lost their loved ones in the violence and firing. He claimed that the administration’s insensitive action without listening to all parties further vitiated the situation and resulted in the death of many people, for which the BJP government is directly responsible.

Rahul Gandhi further said that the BJP’s use of power to create rift and discrimination between Hindu-Muslim communities is neither in the interest of the state nor the country. He also requested the Supreme Court to intervene in this matter as soon as possible and provide justice.

Earlier on Sunday, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP, along with the state government and administration of orchestrating the violence. 

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com