English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Leaders of 22 Opposition parties ask EC to count 100% VVPATs in case of mismatch in 5

Published

on

EVM-VVPAT

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Contending that the Supreme Court mandated matching of 5 of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) votes with Verified Voter Paper Trail (VVPAT) was only for a sample, leaders of 22 Opposition parties, in a meeting with Election Commission (EC) today (Tuesday, May 21) said that in case the sample indicated a mismatch, all votes should be matched with VVPAT slips.

In April, the Supreme Court had ordered the election commission to count to verify EVM votes with the paper slips generated by the VVPATs, or voter verifiable paper audit trail, for five polling booths selected on random basis in every assembly segment of a Lok Sabha constituency.

The commission, which reportedly heard them articulate their apprehensions for nearly an hour, did not give a firm commitment, said media reports. But they did get the assurance that the three Election Commission members would meet on Wednesday morning to discuss their two suggestions on counting of votes from the VVPAT slips.

The opposition parties are demanding that the VVPATs for the five selected booths in each assembly segment should be counted first. Their second demand is that if there is any discrepancy during VVPAT verification at the 5 booths, the Election Commission should go by the paper slips of VVPATs of all polling stations of that particular Assembly segment.

“We told the EC that the VVPAT machines should be counted first and if there is any discrepancy, then all of them in that segment should be counted,” Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad told reporters after meeting EC officials.

In the instructions put out by the poll panel, the VVPAT slips were to be counted at the end of the last round.

“This is a no brainer,” said Abhishek Singhvi of the Congress. After all, he reasoned, the Supreme Court had ordered counting of VVPAT slips from five polling booths only as a sample. If there is a problem with the sample, it means that entire lot may have been tampered.

Singhvi was also sore that the EC needed time to think about the two demands or suggestions from the opposition. Singhvi said this wasn’t a new proposal that the opposition parties had sprung on the commission but was part of the bundle of memos that had been sent to the poll panel.

“We raised these same issues in last one-and-a-half months. We asked Election Commission why have they not responded. Strangely, EC heard us for almost an hour and assured us they will meet us again tomorrow,” ANI quoted Singhvi as saying.

Also Read: EC rejects allegations of EVM swapping after videos of the machines being moved go viral

Telugu Desam Party chief Chandrababu Naidu, who has played a key role in rallying the opposition leaders around EVMs, said the opposition parties have asked the EC to “respect the mandate” of the people and it “can’t be manipulated”.

The opposition leaders also made a pointed reference to former president Pranab Mukherjee’s statement on Tuesday that underlined that the onus for ensuring institutional integrity of the electoral system and the EVM lies with the Election Commission of India

The fresh emphasis on concerns around voting machines comes against the backdrop of multiple reports and videos of EVMs being transported, which opposition parties say, raises questions about the reliability of the voting machines.

The Election Commission rebutted these reports, insisting that the polled EVMs and VVPATs had been brought to the designated strongrooms under security cover and in the presence of the candidates.

The parties also want the election commission to introduce a system for tracking EVM machines so that they can be identified with their numbers and location of use. An apprehensive Congress feels it is very important to track the EVMs to better understand the logic of replacement of machines.

The top opposition leaders had earlier in the day met to discuss the possibility of a non-NDA alliance staking claim to government formation.

Also Read: Ready for floor test: Kamal Nath

Ahmed Patel, Ghulam Nabi Azad, Ashok Gehlot, Abhishek Manu Singhvi of the Congress, TDP’s Chandrababu Naidu, Satish Chandra Misra of the BSP, Sitaram Yechury of the CPI(M), D Raja of the CPI, Delhi Chief Minister and AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal, Derek O’Brien of the TMC, Ramgopal Yadav of the SP, Kanimozhi of the DMK, Manoj Jha (RJD), Majeed Memon (NCP), Devinder Rana (NC) had taken part in the meeting held before the leaders headed out for the meeting with the election commission.

Also Read: Narendra Modi pays tribute to former PM Rajiv Gandhi on his death anniversary

The Opposition meeting came on a day the Supreme Court dismissed a PIL by a Chennai-based organisation ‘Tech 4 All’, seeking 100 per cent matching of VVPAT slips with EVMs during the counting of votes on May 23.

“The CJI had dealt with this matter. Why are you taking chance before a two-judge vacation bench. We will not list any such case for urgent hearing. We cannot override the CJI’s order…This is nonsense,” said a vacation bench comprising justices Arun Mishra and MR Shah.

A three-judge bench, headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi, on May 7 had dismissed a review plea filed by 21 opposition leaders seeking that random matching of VVPAT slips with EVMs be increased to 50 per cent.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Supreme court upholds Congress MP’s right to post poem, says literature, poetry and satire makes life more meaningful

The Supreme Court has dismissed an FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi, stating that courts must protect the freedom of speech and that restrictions must be reasonable, not fanciful.

Published

on

Supreme Court India, Imran Pratapgarhi FIR, freedom of speech, Article 19, creative freedom, poetry controversy, Kunal Kamra row, Gujarat Police, Indian Constitution rights

The Supreme Court has quashed an FIR against Congress Rajya Sabha MP Imran Pratapgarhi over a poem posted on Instagram, reinforcing its stance on protecting freedom of speech. The top court stated that courts must lead in safeguarding the right to free expression and observed that mere discomfort or disagreement cannot be grounds for curbing speech.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan ruled that no offence was made out in the case, criticising the Gujarat Police for its prompt action against the parliamentarian. The FIR was registered in Jamnagar on January 3 by a clerk working for an advocate, who alleged that the poem “Ae khoon ke pyase baat suno” disturbed social harmony.

The court stressed that Article 19(2) of the Constitution, which allows reasonable restrictions on free speech, should not overshadow the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19(1). “Restrictions must be reasonable, not fanciful,” the bench noted.

Highlighting the significance of creative expression, the court said, “Literature, including poetry, drama, films, stand-up comedy, satire, and art, makes life more meaningful.” It further remarked that in a democratic society, differing opinions must be addressed with counter-speech rather than suppression.

This verdict comes amid a broader debate over artistic freedom, just days after stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra faced FIRs and public outrage for remarks about Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde during a performance in Mumbai.

In his defence, Congress MP claimed the poem was penned by celebrated poets Faiz Ahmed Faiz or Habib Jalib, submitting AI-generated screenshots to support his claim. The prosecution, however, argued that as a lawmaker, he should have acted more responsibly.

The Gujarat High Court had earlier refused to quash the FIR, but the Supreme Court overruled that decision, sending a strong message on the primacy of free speech in a democratic framework.

Continue Reading

India News

Kunal Kamra mocked Shinde, Nirmala Sitharaman, Maharashtra minister warns comedian over traitor jibe, cites anger of Shiv Sainiks

Maharashtra minister Shambhuraj Desai has threatened comedian Kunal Kamra with ‘Shiv Sena’s prasad’ over parody videos targeting Eknath Shinde, Nirmala Sitharaman and PM Modi.

Published

on

Kunal Kamra, Shambhuraj Desai, Eknath Shinde, , Nirmala Sitharaman, Kunal Kamra parody song controversy,

Comedian Kunal Kamra is facing escalating backlash from Maharashtra’s political leadership, with state minister Shambhuraj Desai on Thursday issuing a stern warning, saying Kamra will soon receive the “prasad of Shiv Sena” for his repeated satire targeting prominent leaders including Eknath Shinde, Nirmala Sitharaman, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Desai’s comments came in response to Kamra reposting parody videos from his show in Mumbai, where he mockingly referred to Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde as a “traitor” — a jab at Shinde’s 2022 rebellion against Uddhav Thackeray, which split the Shiv Sena.

“Patience is running out,” warns Desai

In a sharp statement, Desai accused Kamra of “crossing all limits” and claimed the comic was deliberately insulting senior political figures. He said, “Wherever he’s hiding, we will drag him out. Now it’s time to give him ‘prasad’.” Desai also pointed to the earlier attack on Kamra’s studio in Mumbai’s Khar area by Shiv Sena workers, saying their anger was already evident.

“We are ministers and MLAs, but first we are Shiv Sainiks. Our patience is running out,” Desai added, calling Kamra’s parodies provocative and intentional.

References to police action and third-degree treatment

Desai went a step further by invoking police action, suggesting Kamra may face more than just legal consequences. “Police give ‘prasad’ to accused using tyres. It’s time to give the same to Kamra,” he said, referencing a controversial method often associated with custodial abuse, sparking concerns over the tone of the warning.

The minister also said that Chief Minister Eknath Shinde has assured action against Kamra under the law and challenged the comic to face the Shiv Sena openly.

Kamra’s videos at the center of controversy

Kamra recently reposted clips from his show at The Habitat in Mumbai. One of the parody songs, based on Hum Honge Kamyaab, featured visuals of the post-show studio vandalism, allegedly carried out by Shinde supporters. In another clip uploaded Wednesday, Kamra spoofed Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman using Hawa Hawai from Mr. India.

The controversy, which began with political satire, has now turned into a high-tension standoff between the comedian and Maharashtra’s ruling leaders.

Continue Reading

India News

Kunal Kamra summoned, Rahul Solapurkar untouched: Uddhav questions Maharashtra govt’s silence on Shivaji Maharaj controversy

Uddhav Thackeray criticises Maharashtra govt for summoning Kunal Kamra over a parody while ignoring actor Solapurkar’s controversial comment on Shivaji Maharaj.

Published

on

Uddhav Thackeray, Kunal Kamra gaddar controvery, Rahul Solapurkar Shivaji Maharaj controversy, Eknath Shinde,

Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray on Thursday lashed out at the Maharashtra government, questioning why stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra was summoned for allegedly mocking Deputy CM Eknath Shinde, while actor Rahul Solapurkar faced no action for his controversial remarks about Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.

Kamra was recently issued two summons by the Mumbai Police after a parody song in his show, perceived as a dig at Shinde, sparked outrage. The comedian’s parody video led to Shinde supporters storming the recording studio. Calling it a selective action, Thackeray said “He didn’t even name Shinde, yet Kamra is being targeted,” said Thackeray. He also accused the Maharashtra government for shielding Eknath Shinde while ignoring more serious issues.

Kamra vs Solapurkar: Thackeray questions double standards

Thackeray contrasted the swift action against Kamra with the lack of any summons for Rahul Solapurkar, who claimed in a podcast that Shivaji Maharaj escaped from Agra Fort by bribing Mughal officials—an assertion that triggered backlash from some right-wing groups. “Has even one summons been sent to Solapurkar?” Thackeray asked, calling out what he sees as biased governance.

He further questioned Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis’s support for Shinde, stating, “The CM is protecting the man Kamra didn’t even name. What right do you have to take action against him?”

BJP’s ‘Saugat-e-Modi’ campaign branded as political gimmick

Thackeray also took aim at the BJP’s Eid outreach campaign, calling the ‘Saugat-e-Modi’ kits distributed to Muslim households nothing more than a ploy for votes. “This is not a gift from Modi but a gift of power—‘Saugat-e-Satta’,” he said. Thackeray also accused the BJP of long using anti-Muslim sentiment and now reversing course for electoral gains. “They should clarify whether they want to feed Muslims or poison them,” he said.

Sharp criticism of handling of past incidents

Speaking at press conference, Thackeray also questioned the state government’s inaction in several incidents like Pune Porsche crash case, saying sarcastically, “He’ll probably be asked to write a 300-word essay.” He also raised questions about the unresolved case of a student’s death in a police encounter in Badlapur and criticised the lack of progress on the Shivaji Maharaj memorial project in the Arabian Sea.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com