English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

“Student protests are being politicised”

Protests mount at many places across the country against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), with violence at many places. Protests in Delhi’s Jamia Millia Islamia and Uttar Pradesh‘s Aligarh Muslim University led to violent clashes. 

Published

on

Mudda

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Panelists say administration should have ensured peaceful protests

Protests mount at many places across the country against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), with violence at many places. Protests in Delhi’s Jamia Millia Islamia and Uttar Pradesh‘s Aligarh Muslim University led to violent clashes. The apex court will hear petition regarding the protests and arson on December 18. APN’s popular debate Mudda discussed the issue. Anchorperson Parivesh Vatsayan posed the questions to the panellists, including the BJP’s Aniruddh Singh, Congress’s Manoj Tiwari, ABVP’s Ashutosh Shrivastava and noted scribe Kumar Bhavesh Chandra.

Chandra said: “In Ranchi today there’s an election, the situation is tense. Violence has to be stopped. The administration should have been alerted about such events. Isn’t it a failure of the intelligence services? Why they did not alert the government? This is the time of examinations, and students will not start the protests for nothing. There is angst and provocation as well. We cannot rule out political hand in the protests and violence. Now, Prime Minister Modi should focus on sabka vishwas (confidence of all).”

Singh said: “Section 144 is clamped in parts of UP.  There is a way to hold a protest. It does not mean that you shall be allowed to burn public transport. CAA was introduced by an elected government. Please feel free to debate on any subject. Students should understand that. But politicians are stoking communal fires. We have video tapes, stones were hurled on the cops.”

Tiwari said: “I would appeal to the students to hold peaceful protests. This is a country of Gandhi, let’s live as per his ideals. Yesterday’s protests in Delhi were peaceful; nearby Okhla people joined it, but suddenly the issue flared up. Students were beaten about mercilessly, look at the footage for that. A Ranchi student stated that the police came suddenly and started beating students. See, we may agree or not agree with the government. It is the government’s job to get consensus, to talk to all factions, and interested groups. If the BJP had the consensus, why its ally parties are protesting? The government has got a huge mandate, but appears to have forgotten the definition of democracy.”

Singh said:”We are not compromising on democracy. Our manifesto mentioned scrapping of Art 370, and so on. People read the manifesto and voted for us. The students are post-graduate students, not children. Now how can you say students were studying in the library on a Sunday? We have footage regarding that.”

Tiwari said: “In University library, students do go on Sundays to study. Delhi Police saw students in the library, now where was the provocation to start beating them? Sometime back in BHU, students were beaten. And when such incidents happen, the blame is laid on opposition parties. There is nothing wrong in the protests. Holding protests is perfectly democratic.”

Chandra said: “I can definitely see a political script behind some incidents. But of course, wherever there are minority elements, there is anger against the government. Semester exams are going on, and such events are disturbing the students. The government needs to tackle the situation delicately. It looks as if both opposition and the ruling parties are out to milk the situation.”

Shrivastav said: “Students do join protests when things get out of hand. India’s resources are limited, so why should we allow outsiders to come in.”

Chandra said: ”Students have the right to be worried about their future. This youth is the future of tomorrow.”

Singh said:”But students need to be told not to get violent.”

Shrivastav said: “Students will protest, it is the administration job to ensure peace. It is not fair to beat agitating groups.”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Continue Reading

India News

Harivansh set to be elected Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson unopposed

Harivansh is set to be elected unopposed as Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman after no opposition nominations were filed before the deadline.

Published

on

Former Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh is set to be re-elected to the same post unopposed in the election due to be held later today.
The date has been fixed by the Chairman under the relevant rules governing the conduct of business in the Upper House.
According to sources, the deadline for submitting motions for the election was 12 noon on April 16. A total of five notices were received within the stipulated time, all proposing Harivansh for the post.

Multiple nominations, single candidate
The motions were submitted by members across parties, including Jagat Prakash Nadda, Nitin Nabin, Nirmala Sitharaman, Sanjay Kumar Jha, and Jayant Chaudhary, each backed by seconding members.
All five motions explicitly state that Harivansh be chosen as the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

No opposition nomination filed

Notably, no motion was submitted by the Opposition before the deadline. This effectively clears the path for a unanimous election, as there is no contest for the position.
As per parliamentary procedure, motions will be taken up one by one. Once any one motion is adopted by the House, the remaining motions will not be put to vote.

Likely to be elected by voice vote
In line with established practice, the first motion — expected to be moved by Nadda — may be adopted through a voice vote. Following this, the Chairman will formally declare Harivansh as elected Deputy Chairman.
After the declaration, Harivansh will be escorted to the Chair by members from both the Treasury and Opposition benches, adhering to parliamentary convention.

Continue Reading

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com