English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Entertainment

The Kashmir Files to be banned in Singapore, here’s WHY

Singapore has banned the Bollywood film The Kashmir Files because the authorities have stated that the film has been assessed to be beyond the city-state’s film classification guidelines.

Published

on

the kashmir files

Singapore has banned the Bollywood film The Kashmir Files because the authorities have stated that the film has been assessed to be beyond the city-state’s film classification guidelines.

Infocomm Media Development Authority in a joint statement with the Ministry of Culture, Community, and Youth (MCCY) and the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said the film will be banned due to its aggressive and one-sided representation of Muslims and portrayals of Hindus being prosecuted in the escalating crisis in Kashmir.

Vivek Agnihotri’s film The Kashmir Files was released in March and since then it is receiving mixed reviews. The film is based on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Muslim-majority Valley in the 1990s due to terrorism.

The authorities further said that in our multiracial and multireligious culture, these representations have the potential to create hatred between different communities and disturb social cohesiveness and religious peace. Under the film classification guidelines, any material that is denigrating racial or religious communities in Singapore will be refused classification.

Read Also: Late Danish Siddiqui, Adnan Abidi, Sanna Irshad Mattoo, Amit Dave win Pulitzer for images of coronavirus second wave

During a recent news conference, Vivek Agnihotri said that a section of the international media was seeking to conduct an international political campaign against his film The Kashmir Files. 

Vivek Agnihotri was joined at the conference by his wife, acclaimed actress Pallavi Joshi said that every big player who defames India’s reputation around the world without verifying the facts began calling me, and their main line of inquiry was only Hindu-Muslim. Nobody, not even a single person, bothered to ask about the victims I interviewed for my film. Not one person sought to question me about the facts I showed in the movie and whether they were correct or incorrect, he further said.

He went on to say that the international media is making a political campaign against the film. They accuse us of inciting Islamophobia. I state unequivocally that Islamophobia is being used as a political weapon against my film as part of a global political conspiracy, Agnihotri said. The film is anti-terrorist in nature. The word ‘Muslim’ is never mentioned in the film. The words Pakistan and Pakistani are not used in the film. It’s an anti-terrorism film, he concluded.

What happened at Punjab Police’s Intelligence headquarters in Mohali?

Monkeypox Virus: Another virus knocked after Corona, know effects, treatment

Entertainment

120 Bahadur box office day 1: Farhan Akhtar’s film starts slow with Rs 2.35 crore opening

Farhan Akhtar’s new release 120 Bahadur opened to Rs2.35 crore, while De De Pyaar De 2 continued its strong hold on day eight.

Published

on

Farhan akhtar

Farhan Akhtar’s latest release 120 Bahadur hit theatres on November 21 but registered a dull opening on its first day, earning Rs 2.35 crore. In comparison, De De Pyaar De 2, which is now in its second week, continues to show stronger hold at the box office.

Slow start for 120 Bahadur on day one

The action-drama opened to modest numbers on Friday, collecting Rs2.35 crore on its first day. Despite pre-release buzz around Farhan Akhtar’s performance, the film has begun its run on the lower side.

De De Pyaar De 2 maintains its advantage

Meanwhile, De De Pyaar De 2 continues its steady run. On its eighth day, the film maintained an edge over 120 Bahadur in overall earnings, according to media. The strong hold of the Ajay Devgn-led sequel appears to have impacted the new release’s opening day business.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Family Man 3 ending triggers online backlash despite strong reviews

The Family Man 3 has impressed viewers with its performances and storytelling, but its abrupt ending has sparked online criticism, leaving fans demanding closure.

Published

on

Family man

Fans of The Family Man 3 are celebrating the gripping new season, but a large section of viewers has taken to social media to criticise what they describe as an “abrupt” and “unsatisfying” ending. The latest season, which released on Amazon Prime Video on Friday, has drawn praise for its emotional depth and high-stakes storytelling, yet its final moments have left many feeling short-changed.

Viewers disappointed with the “sudden” conclusion

Soon after the release, frustrated fans began sharing their reactions online. One viewer wrote that the season “ends so abruptly it feels like the makers simply packed up and went home,” calling the lack of closure “exhausting”. Another comment read, “#TheFamilyMan3… ahh ending entra. Fully disappointed.”

Some tried to strike a balanced tone, acknowledging the well-crafted emotional arc and a comic cameo stretch that offered relief. However, the overall complaint remained the same — that the season cuts off just when the tension reaches its peak. “Why make us watch the entire season if the makers plan to keep the best part hanging for the next one?” a user questioned.

Still, many fans have labelled the show “engaging” and applauded the team for delivering another compelling chapter.

Season 3: Srikant caught between personal turmoil and a national crisis

The new season places Srikant Tiwari (Manoj Bajpayee) in one of the most complicated phases of his life. His relationship with Suchitra (Priyamani) appears strained, marked by distance and unspoken tension. Even as his home life falters, a series of coordinated blasts in the Northeast within 48 hours threatens a major peace initiative led by Prime Minister Basu (Seema Biswas).

Srikant and his senior officer Gautam Kulkarni (Dalip Tahil) travel to Nagaland to salvage Project Sahakar, relying on regional leader David Khuzou (Sunil Thapa) to bring warring sides to agreement. But the fragile situation collapses after a deadly ambush by drug kingpin Rukma (Jaideep Ahlawat), leaving David and Kulkarni dead. Srikant survives but soon becomes a suspect as investigators scrutinise how he was the only one aware of the convoy’s route.

Meanwhile in Mumbai, Suchitra faces her own crisis after the government bans 69 Chinese apps, including her platform ShrinkMe, sparking online targeting that impacts her family.

With an arrest warrant issued against him, Srikant chooses to escape with his family, setting off a tense chase as he tries to prove his innocence. Each twist raises new questions — who planned the ambush, and why is Srikant being framed?

Final reactions

While audiences largely appreciated the writing, performances and momentum, the widespread sentiment remains that the season’s final act lacked the closure fans expected. Many now hope the next instalment arrives sooner and concludes the arc that Season 3 left unresolved.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Satish Shah, beloved Sarabhai vs Sarabhai actor, passes away at 74 in Mumbai due to kidney failure

Veteran actor Satish Shah, celebrated for his iconic comic roles in Sarabhai vs Sarabhai and Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro, passed away in Mumbai at the age of 74 due to kidney failure.

Published

on

Satish Shah

Veteran Bollywood actor Satish Shah, best known for his memorable comic roles in films and television, passed away on Saturday in Mumbai. He was 74.

Filmmaker Confirms The News

Confirming the tragic news, filmmaker Ashoke Pandit expressed grief over the actor’s demise, saying that Shah died around 2:30 pm following kidney failure. His condition reportedly worsened at home before being rushed to the hospital, where he could not be revived. His cremation is expected to take place later today.

“It’s a very big loss for the industry. I have worked with him on many projects,” said the filmmaker, recalling that he learned about Shah’s death shortly after attending adman Piyush Pandey’s last rites.

A Legacy Of Laughter

Born on June 25, 1951, in Bombay (now Mumbai), Satish Shah hailed from a Kutchi Gujarati family. His career began in 1978 with Arvind Desai Ki Ajeeb Dastaan, but it was his portrayal of Municipal Commissioner D’Mello in the 1983 satire Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro that brought him widespread recognition.

Over a remarkable film career spanning decades, Shah appeared in more than 250 movies, including Hum Saath Saath Hain (1999), Kal Ho Naa Ho (2003), Mujhse Shaadi Karogi (2004), and Om Shanti Om (2007).

Television Stardom

Shah also left a lasting impact on Indian television. His 1984 sitcom Yeh Jo Hai Zindagi became iconic, where he played a new character in each of its 55 episodes. His role as Indravadhan Sarabhai in Sarabhai vs Sarabhai (2004), opposite Ratna Pathak Shah, remains one of the most loved comic portrayals in Indian TV history.

He also starred in Filmy Chakkar (1995) and later judged comedy-based reality shows such as Comedy Circus, continuing his association with humour and entertainment.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com