English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Amit Shah says son Jay Shah did not wrong as he done no business with Govt

Published

on

Amit Shah says son Jay Shah did not wrong as he done no business with Govt

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]BJP president Amit Shah sought to defend his son Jay Shah’s business growing 16000-fold after his party came to power, saying his company had not received any contract or land from the government and there was no corruption in its businesses.

“As far as the company is concerned, it has not done business worth a rupee with the government. It has not got government land worth a rupee, it has not got any government contract worth even a rupee,” Shah said.

The BJP chief said that by filing a defamation suit, his son had voluntarily sought an inquiry into the allegations. “The court will now decide on the matter. Jay has moved the court,” he said at a programme organised by a news channel here.

Amit Shah says son Jay Shah did not wrong as he done no business with GovtHitting out at his detractors, Shah said if there were any documents to prove allegations of wrongdoing by his son’s company, they should be produced before a court of law.

News website The Wire had reported that the turnover of Jay Shah’s company had risen spectacularly after the BJP came to power in 2014.

BJP president Amit Shah said the company traded in agricultural commodities such as rice and millets. “They are saying the company’s turnover rose to Rs 80 crore from a mere Rs 50,000, but they are not showing that it incurred a loss of Rs 1.5 crore. This is a high-volume, low-profit business. If the company’s turnover becomes Rs 1 crore, its profit does not become Rs 1 crore. Despite this turnover, he did not earn profit. All the payments were made through cheque; there is no question of money laundering,” he said.

Asked how could the company get a loan of Rs 25 crore from a cooperative bank, Shah said, “You have to understand first that it was not a loan, but a letter of credit. We were given a credit to lift material against cash deposits. Jay’s cash was lying in the bank, and we have paid the loan with interest.”

Seeking to project his son’s defamation suit against the news portal as evidence of his being clean, Amit Shah slammed Congress leaders for demanding an inquiry into Jay’s business dealings, asking why no Congress leader had ever filed a defamation suit when corruption allegations were levelled against them.

“Have they ever filed a criminal defamation or a Rs 100-crore civil defamation suit? Why could they not gather the courage to file such a suit?” he asked.

“The company has not taken commission as in the case of Bofors,” Shah said, referring to the payoffs scandal allegedly involving the Nehru Gandhi family.

A Gujarat court had adjourned hearing on a criminal defamation petition filed by Jay Shah against The Wire on an application filed on behalf of senior lawyer SV Raju, representing Jay, on his non availability. Jay had also filed a civil defamation suit at Ahmedabad district (Mirzapur) court against the website and sought damages of Rs 100 crore.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Shots fired at Sania Mirza’s sister Anam’s Dawat-e-Ramzan exhibition after altercation in Hyderabad; 1 arrested

Interestingly, Hassebuddin, also known as Hyder, is not connected to either shop owner involved in the dispute. He is a former local leader (Sarpanch) residing in the AC Guards Paramount Colony and holds a valid gun license issued in Nampally.

Published

on

A confrontation between two individuals at the Dawat-e-Ramzan exhibition held at King’s Palace became dangerously intense when shots were reportedly fired. The event, organized by Anam Mirza, sister of tennis star Sania Mirza, is a well-known attraction in Hyderabad during the Ramadan season.

The altercation occurred on Saturday, March 29, when a man allegedly discharged two rounds during a dispute between the owners of a perfume shop and a toy shop at the expo. Authorities were alerted and quickly apprehended the suspect, confiscating the weapon he used for the shooting.

According to the Inspector from Gudimalkapur police station, the skirmish stemmed from a minor disagreement between the two shop owners, which was in the process of being resolved. However, during this dispute, the accused, identified as Hassebuddin, fired two shots into the air using his licensed pistol. The police are currently investigating the circumstances that led to the gunfire and have filed a case under the Arms Act.

Interestingly, Hassebuddin, also known as Hyder, is not connected to either shop owner involved in the dispute. He is a former local leader (Sarpanch) residing in the AC Guards Paramount Colony and holds a valid gun license issued in Nampally.

Hyderabad is home to various exhibitions and food festivals during Ramadan, with Anam Mirza’s Dawat-e-Ramzan being one of the most popular. The expo features over 400 retail stalls and 60 food brands, making it one of the largest events celebrating the month.

Anam Mirza, who has been a fashion curator since 2012 and operates her own YouTube channel, has made a significant impact in the community through her work. The Dawat-e-Ramzan expo provides employment to more than 3,000 individuals during Ramadan and attracts over 250,000 visitors within just 11 days of its operation.

Continue Reading

India News

Days after praising Mohanlal’s Empuraan, Kerala BJP chief Rajeev Chandrasekhar changes his stance on film, says he is disappointed

Former Union minister and current Kerala BJP president Rajeev Chandrasekhar has publicly revised his initial enthusiasm for the film, now expressing his disappointment in the type of storytelling involved.

Published

on

The release of the film L2: Empuraan, directed by Prithviraj Sukumaran and starring Mohanlal, has ignited significant controversy due to its portrayal of the alleged 2002 Gujarat riots. Former Union minister and current Kerala BJP president Rajeev Chandrasekhar has publicly revised his initial enthusiasm for the film, now expressing his disappointment in the type of storytelling involved.

Initially, Chandrasekhar had taken to social media to express excitement about the film, stating he was looking forward to enjoying it. However, as backlash grew—particularly from Hindutva organizations branding the film as ‘anti-Hindu’—the BJP’s Kerala unit chose to distance itself from the unfolding drama, asserting that it would allow audiences to form their own opinions post-viewing.

In a prior statement, BJP state general secretary P Sudheer emphasized that the party would not be swayed by cinematic tales, and highlighted that activists from the Sangh Parivar are entitled to share their views.

Amidst escalating tensions surrounding the film, which reportedly received orders from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for 17 cuts, Chandrasekhar shifted his stance. He conveyed his sentiments through a post on X, reflecting on his earlier intention to watch the film. He acknowledged enjoying another Mohanlal film, Lucifer, and conveyed his discontent regarding the significant amendments made to Empuraan. He expressed concern that the film’s controversial topics might disturb viewers, noting, “any film that tries to build a narrative by distorting the truth is doomed to fail.”

As a result, he concluded that he would not watch this sequel and reiterated his disappointment with this style of filmmaking.

Conversely, the Congress party has defended L2: Empuraan, calling it a pan-Indian film and criticizing the campaign against its creators. Kerala State Youth Congress president Rahul Mamkoottathil condemned the backlash, pointing out parallels to those who previously championed freedom of expression for films perceived as promoting unfounded religious narratives, such as the Kashmir Files and Kerala Story.

The landscape surrounding L2: Empuraan remains charged, showcasing the intersection of cinema, politics, and societal narratives in contemporary India.

Continue Reading

India News

Uttar Pradesh govt bans sale of meat within 500 m of religious places during Navratri

Additionally, stringent measures will be enforced on Ram Navami, which falls on April 6, including a complete prohibition on animal slaughter and meat sales.

Published

on

In anticipation of the nine-day Chaitra Navratri festival starting on Sunday, March 30, the Uttar Pradesh Government has announced a crackdown on illegal slaughterhouses and imposed a ban on the sale of meat within a 500-meter radius of religious sites.

Additionally, stringent measures will be enforced on Ram Navami, which falls on April 6, including a complete prohibition on animal slaughter and meat sales.

Amrit Abhijat, Principal Secretary of the Urban Development Department, has instructed district magistrates, police commissioners, and municipal commissioners to swiftly implement the closure of slaughterhouses and enforce the meat sale restrictions near places of worship, as stated by the Uttar Pradesh Government on Saturday, March 29, 2025.

The Yogi Adityanath Administration cited previous directives from 2014 and 2017, reiterating that illegal animal slaughter and meat sales near religious locations are strictly forbidden. To ensure compliance, the government has established district-level committees led by district magistrates, comprising officials from various departments, including police, the Pollution Control Board, Animal Husbandry, Transport, Labour, Health, and Food Safety Administration.

In line with the U.P. Municipal Corporation Act of 1959 and the Food Safety Acts of 2006 and 2011, the government has called for rigorous punitive measures against those who violate these regulations.

Director of Information Shishir emphasized, “There will be no meat or fish shops within 500 meters during Navratri. Shops outside this radius must adhere to their licensing terms. Open selling is prohibited, and all meat retailers will be closed on Ram Navami.”

The Chaitra Navratri festival, honoring Goddess Durga, will begin on Sunday, March 30, 2025.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com