English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

SEBI fines stock market influencer Asmita Patel who made Rs 104 crore by selling tips

SEBI concluded that Patel’s assertions about managing a substantial portfolio “appear completely false and were likely made to entice participants to various courses.”

Published

on

Asmita Jitesh Patel, a director of the well-known Asmita Patel Global School of Trading Pvt Ltd, appears to have constructed her business empire through exaggerated claims and false promises of effortless wealth.

One of the most troubling aspects of her approach was the irresponsible advice given to participants in her courses and workshops, including urging them to borrow money for trading and to quit their jobs to pursue trading full-time.

On February 6, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) froze illegal profits totalling nearly ₹54 crore and demanded that the school and its directors explain why approximately ₹104 crore in fees should not be confiscated.

SEBI officials found that representatives from the school, including Patel, cited numerous examples of individuals abandoning their jobs and achieving remarkable success after taking her courses or following her trading strategies. For instance, it was claimed that a vice president of a large company increased his trading capital from ₹30 lakh to ₹3 crore, a chartered accountant boosted his capital from ₹30 lakh to ₹12 crore, and an engineer left his job to become a full-time trader, accumulating ₹80 lakh in trading capital.

The SEBI order highlighted that “students/investors/participants were encouraged to leave their jobs and join MPAT (a course offered by her institute) in order to achieve significant success.” Participants were even advised to withdraw from mutual fund investments or to use borrowed money if they lacked sufficient capital. In a recorded conversation with a course participant, Patel suggested borrowing for trading, recommending that the interest rate not exceed 18 per cent.

Over multiple discussions, stock trading was portrayed as a lucrative business with continuous profits. One student was told to anticipate returns of 35-40 per cent, and the risk-reward ratio was touted as 1:3, among other enticing figures.

While SEBI regulations allow minors to hold demat and trading accounts, the operation of these accounts requires the involvement of a guardian, and trading accounts can only be used for selling securities acquired through gifts, transfers, or regulatory directives. According to SEBI’s guidelines, “a minor cannot enter into a contract with a stock broker to buy or sell any security.”

In one video, Patel downplayed the necessity of understanding financial markets or statements, stating that even someone with a basic education who could perform simple arithmetic could invest in stocks.

Patel frequently referred to herself using grandiose titles, dubbing herself the “She Wolf of the stock market” and the “options queen,” asserting that her strategies could yield returns of up to 300 per cent. However, SEBI’s investigation revealed that from 2019 to January 2024, the school and Patel registered trading profits of merely ₹12.28 lakh.

She also claimed to manage portfolios totalling ₹140 crore and oversee funds worth ₹283 crore, but the investigation indicated these figures were grossly inflated. The actual turnover from the trades associated with her accounts and the school was just over ₹15.27 crore, a fraction of her claim regarding the ₹140 crore portfolio.

SEBI concluded that Patel’s assertions about managing a substantial portfolio “appear completely false and were likely made to entice participants to various courses.”

Furthermore, the agreements signed by clients and students enrolling in her programs contained peculiar clauses, one of which stated that any loss in trading capital during the program would not affect the participant’s “mental stability, physical health, and social well-being.”

The agreements included a disclaimer asserting that the institute does not endorse get-rich-quick schemes, emphasizing a belief in hard work and value addition. However, SEBI’s preliminary findings suggested that “despite disclaimers in the agreements with students/investors/participants asserting that it was not a get-rich program and that no returns were guaranteed, the actual circumstances stood in stark contrast.”

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com