English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Bulandshahr violence: indications of conspiracy to stoke communal violence

Published

on

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]It would seem the Uttar Pradesh (UP) police was not completely wrong in saying that probe into the cow slaughter was of higher priority than the killing of its inspector, Subodh Kumar Singh, in the ensuing violence in Bulandshahr.

Perhaps it is not going the way it was intended to, when UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath asked the state police to give more importance to the issue of cow slaughter.

A probe by the Additional Director General (Intelligence) SB Shirodkar, reported News18, found that the Bulandshahr mob violence in which a police inspector and a youngster were killed was a larger conspiracy, with the likely intent to clash with the Muslim procession passing through Bulandshahr-Garhmukteshwar State Highway on Monday.

The report, submitted to the UP police chief and to be given to chief minister Yogi Adityanath at the time of the report, said that the biggest sign of the violence being a pre-planned conspiracy was that the cow carcass found at the spot, which was the trigger for the violence, was 48 hours old and was most likely not slaughtered in Sayana village as claimed by Barjrang Dal’s district head Yogeshraj Singh, who had in his police complaint stated that he witnessed the cow being killed.

It further said that the mob behaviour suggests that some in the crowd were deliberately trying to escalate the situation and ensure violence.

“They didn’t lift the road blockade even after an FIR was registered (based on Yogeshraj’s complaint. When inspector Subodh Kumar Singh informed them that a case was lodged, some in the mob fled with the tractor and left the trolley with remains of dead animal parked on the road to block it,” reads the report.

The ADG said this is when inspector Subodh and some officers, including the tehsildar, realised that the intent could be to confront the crowd that was shortly to return from the Muslim convention that had just got over some 30 km away.

Sensing trouble, they tried to remove the trolley with the carcass, but encountered stiff resistance and this is when the violence escalated.

Calling it a failure of intelligence, Shirodkar asked why there was no prior warning about a possible conspiracy to stage a riot after spreading rumours of cow slaughter.

“Though force was sent on spot including 25 men of PAC, more force should have been sent during the crucial hours between 9 am and 1 pm,” the report added.

From this, it appears Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh was killed by people who were trying to start a communal clash – and considering the violence they indulged in, had prepared for it. Moreover, it is clear that the BJP and Sangh parivar outfits had been gunning for the police Inspector for some time. (More on this comes below).

The UP government had also ordered a separate SIT probe, whose report is also awaited.

The police have arrested four Muslim men — Sarfuddin, Sajid, Asif and Nanhe — under sections of the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act 1955 for cow slaughter, despite holes in Yogeshraj’s version.

He had first claimed to have seen the men slaughtering the cow, but later in a video released from hiding, stated that he went to the spot where the cow carcasses were hung after receiving a phone call. The men named in his complaint also included two minors, aged 11 and 12, and three men who live in Delhi-NCR.

Earlier, Additional Superintendent of Police (Bulandshahr) Rayees Akhtar told The Indian Express (IE): “Our main concern at this moment is to find out who killed those cows. After all, it was the killing of the cows that led to the protest, which resulted in Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh’s murder. Our belief is that once we solve that case, it will throw light on how the murder occurred. The cow-killers are our top priority. The murder and rioting case is on the backburner for now.”

So far, police have arrested four persons — Chaman, Devendra, Ashish Chauhan and Satish — for their alleged involvement in Singh’s murder. But they are yet to nab the main accused, Yogeshraj Singh, a Bajrang Dal activist who is on the run.

 Local BJP functionary accused in Inspector’s killing blames him for violence, alleges he was corrupt

Meanwhile, a day after Yogeshraj posted a video on social media claiming his innocence, another video of Accused No.9 in the FIR on Singh’s killing — BJP’s Syana unit youth wing president Shikhar Agarwal — surfaced in which he alleged that the slain SHO had threatened him.

Agarwal, a resident of Siyana, claimed in the video: “I was told of a commotion in Mahwa and when we reached there, I saw that cows had been slaughtered. We put the carcasses in the tractor and went towards Chingravati Police Station where we were stopped by Subodh Kumar Singh. He asked us to bury the carcass there and threatened to shoot us. I informed Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Siyana, Avinash Chandra Maurya, about the conversation who assured that an FIR will be filed.”

Agarwal claimed that the SHO was to blame for the violence. “It was only because Subodh Kumar Singh refused to file an FIR that things got out of hand and a riot-like situation was created.”

Questioning Singh’s integrity, Shikhar Agarwal said: “Everyone in Siyana knows… I have full faith in the Yogi Adityanath government… If I am guilty I will be hanged, if not I will go free.”

Asked about Agarwal’s claims, Bulandshahr SP (City) Pravin Ranjan Singh told IE: “An accused will say whatever he has to say in his defence. It does not matter. Subodh was an honest officer.”

Local saffron leaders had wanted Inspector transferred

A three-month-old letter that has now surfaced indicates that local saffron leaders had sought the officer’s transfer, reported The Times of India (TOI).

In a letter written to Bulandshahr MP Bhola Singh on September 1, BJP functionaries of Syana had accused the officer of putting obstacles in the way of Hindus’ religious functions.

Sanjay Shrotiya, BJP’s Bulandshahr city general secretary and one of the signatories, confirmed that such a letter had been sent to the local MP against the “high-handed attitude” of the Syana SO, the TOI report said.

The handwritten letter was reportedly signed by six BJP leaders of Syana, including local block pramukh Pramendra Yadav.

Alongside this, according to a report in The Hindustan Times (HT), Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh’s wife, Rani, told chief minister Yogi Adityanath on Thursday her husband, who was handling complaints against cow slaughter, used to get threatening calls over the phone.

In a video circulated to the media after her meeting with Adityanath, Rani, who met the UP CM along with her sons in Lucknow, is heard saying, “There is one more thing, Sir. My husband used to call me to the police station (Syana) and I used to go there. The last time when I was there, three people had been arrested for cow slaughter.”

“There was a call from Syana MLA (Devendra Singh Lodhi) when my husband was in the bathroom. He asked me to pick up the call and inform that he was inside,” she says.

However, the HT report said, there is no clarity about what she said further as the video was disconnected – significantly, just at the crucial point.

A senior officer present at the meeting said she only informed the chief minister about the threats her husband used to receive and there was nothing beyond that.

“I have informed the chief minister about all this and he has assured us of a fair inquiry,” Rajni said while speaking to the Hindustan Times over the phone after the meeting.

Slain Inspector was key witness in Dadri lynching case

The murder of police inspector Subodh Kumar Singh in Bulandshahr will affect the Dadri lynching case, the counsel for the victim Mohammad Akhlaq told News18.

“He was one of our most important witnesses. His murder will definitely be a setback,” said Yusuf Saifi, who has been fighting the case in a trial court on behalf of the victim’s family. Singh was witness number 7 in the case.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.

Published

on

Actor Vijay

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.

Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.

The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.

What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?

Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.

The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.

The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.

What is the Veeramani POCSO case?

The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.

The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.

The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.

What has MK Stalin said?

Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.

He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.

The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.

Why has the case become a political issue?

The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.

The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.

At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

Continue Reading

India News

Women wrestlers challenge Brij Bhushan’s acquittal in sexual harassment case

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Four women wrestlers have approached a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The wrestlers have also challenged the acquittal of co-accused Vinod Tomar. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a Special Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts.

The appeal challenges the order passed by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on August 3, 2026, when Brij Bhushan and Tomar were acquitted in the case.

Wrestlers challenge court’s reasoning

In their appeal, the wrestlers have argued that the acquittal order is legally unsustainable and that the evidence was not assessed appropriately.

They have also alleged that the order relied on assumptions about how victims of sexual assault and harassment were expected to behave instead of assessing the evidence and circumstances of the complainants.

The challenge seeks judicial scrutiny of the findings that resulted in the acquittal of Brij Bhushan and Tomar.

Brij Bhushan was acquitted in August

The Rouse Avenue court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh on August 3 in the sexual harassment case involving women wrestlers. The court’s decision followed consideration of the evidence and statements presented during the proceedings.

The case had emerged after several women wrestlers accused the former WFI chief of sexual harassment. The allegations had led to a major protest by wrestlers in 2023.

The latest appeal means the acquittal is now being challenged before a higher court.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress protests against Gyanesh Kumar, demands Election chief’s resignation

Congress workers took to the streets against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with protests and demonstrations held over the party’s allegations concerning the Election Commission.

Published

on

Congress stepped up its campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with party workers taking to the streets and demanding his resignation amid the ongoing row over the Election Commission.

The protests followed repeated criticism by Congress leaders of the poll panel and its functioning. The party has alleged irregularities in the electoral process and has sought accountability from the Election Commission.

Congress leaders have also targeted Gyanesh Kumar personally, with Rahul Gandhi among those calling for the Chief Election Commissioner to step down.

Congress takes protest to streets

Congress workers staged demonstrations in different places as part of the party’s campaign against the Election Commission.

The protests featured sharp symbolism, including masks and handcuffs, as Congress sought to highlight its allegations against the poll panel and demand action against Gyanesh Kumar.

The demonstrations are part of a wider confrontation between the Congress and the Election Commission over issues related to electoral rolls and the conduct of elections.

Congress demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation

The Congress has repeatedly demanded the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar, accusing the Election Commission of failing to adequately address the concerns raised by the opposition party.

Rahul Gandhi has also stepped up his criticism of the poll panel. In a statement on Thursday, he demanded that Gyanesh Kumar resign and alleged that the Election Commission had acknowledged the issue of “vote theft”. These are allegations made by the Congress and should not be treated as an established finding unless confirmed by the relevant authority.

The dispute comes amid a broader political debate over electoral rolls, voter verification and the functioning of the Election Commission.

Election Commission under opposition scrutiny

The Congress has intensified its campaign against the poll body in recent weeks, with party leaders repeatedly questioning its decisions and procedures.

The Election Commission, meanwhile, has maintained that India’s electoral process is conducted according to the Constitution, electoral laws and prescribed procedures. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has previously defended the integrity of the electoral system and rejected claims that electronic voting machines can be remotely hacked.

The latest protests add to the continuing political confrontation over the Election Commission and the opposition’s demands concerning the poll panel’s functioning.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com