English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Bulandshahr violence: three arrested for cow slaughter, cop killers at large

Published

on

Bulandshahr violence

On a day when over 80 retired civil servants criticised Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath for directing police to focus on cow slaughter rather than those who murdered police inspector Subodh Kumar Singh in the violence in Bulandshahr, the state police – as if establishing their point – claimed to have nabbed the main culprits of the cow slaughter incident about a fortnight ago, on Dec 3.

Along with the police inspector, a 20-year-old man who was also named as accused in the violence, was also killed in the violence that followed news of cow slaughter in the area.

Along with three nabbed on charges of cow slaughter, the police have arrested two others in connection with mob violence. The main accused in the cop’s murder, Yogesh Raj, district chief of Bajrang Dal, a Hindutva outfit affiliated to RSS, is still at large.

Also missing since the incident is another accused Shikhar Agrawal, a leader of the BJP Yuva Morcha in the area and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s former Syana town president Upendra Raghav.

Yogesh Raj even posted a video claiming he is innocent. Shikhar Aggarwal gave an interview to a news channel, but the police have not been able to track down either of them.

It was these circumstances that prompted the former bureaucrats –former Lt Governor of Delhi Najeeb Jung included – to also make a request to the Allahabad high court to “take suo motu cognizance of this incident and order a judicial enquiry supervised by them to uncover the true facts, expose the political collusion, fix responsibility and recommend action”. (See full letter below)

The police, focusing on alleged cow slaughter, said they arrested three persons near a local animal market in Bulandshahr after they intercepted a vehicle carrying the suspects based on a tip-off.

The arrested were Nadeem, Raees and Kala, all of the Syana region, police said. A fourth accused, Haroon, managed to flee.

A vehicle, double-barrelled licensed gun, a meat chopper, two knives and a butcher’s wooden block were recovered from them. The items were allegedly used in committing the crime.

The police even claimed that the accused were on course to committing another cow slaughter when they were arrested.

Circle Officer Syana Raghvendra Kumar Mishra said one of the accused, Kala, had in the past spent time in jail over cow slaughter, reported The Hindu. Asked about the alleged motive of the accused in committing the crime, since the BJP government had termed the discovery of the carcasses a ‘conspiracy’, Mishra said things were still being probed.

According to the Bulandshahr police, on the night of December 2-3, two accused Haroon and Nadeem used their weapons to shoot dead three cows in Mahav village in Syana. They then chopped the cows and distributed the meat among themselves, with Haroon carrying away the hide and some meat in his car.

They left the carcasses and the remaining meat in the sugar cane fields, a police statement said.

This was not the only cow slaughter committed by the accused, police said. On the night of December 1, they “hunted a cow” in the Naya forests nearby. The cow was allegedly shot with a licensed gun before being slaughtered, and distributed among the culprits.

On the complaint of Bajrang Dal member Yogesh Raj, police had registered a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1995 and Section 295 of the IPC.

Significantly, none of these persons were named in the original complaint of cow slaughter filed by Yogesh Raj, the Bajrang Dal leader who is the main accused in the killing of inspector Singh, reported NDTV.

There is also no evidence against four others initially arrested in the cow slaughter case, police sources told NDTV. Two of the four men – Sarfuddin and Sajid – were named in the FIR by Yogesh Raj, key accused in the incidents of mob violence and the murder of the inspector. The police say they will move court for the release of these men.

As for mob violence, the Special Task Force (STF) has arrested two more in the case – Sachin Singh or Cobra, 21, and Johnny Chaudhary, 19 – taking the total number of people in custody to 19. But the family of the Inspector says the real killers are still scot-free.

The police so far have named 27 people in the First Information Report and cases have been filed against another 50-60 unidentified persons for violence.

Evidence being destroyed: slain cop’s wife

Rajini Singh, inspector Singh’s wife, alleged that evidence in the case has been destroyed. Speaking to NDTV, she said, “They are protecting their own people and destroying all the evidence one by one. Nobody is there to tell what exactly happened there on that day.” She did not name anyone in particular.

Abhishek Singh, her son, stated that the politicians were protecting the accused. “What else explains the delay in arresting Yogesh Raj. What’s stopping the police? I just hope that my father’s murder doesn’t end up as a file covered in dust,” he said.

The family recently met UP chief minister Adityanath, who had initially said that the inspector’s death was an accident. “I met Yogi ji and told him about my pain. He assured me that my husband’s killers will be arrested soon. But the killers are still roaming free? I want to ask Yogi ji, why haven’t they been arrested?” she said.

Full text of open letter written by former civil servants:

We are a group of retired civil servants from the All India and Central Services who, having spent long years in the service of the Constitution of India, have come together to express ourselves on issues of governance and public policy that have a bearing on constitutional principles, conduct and ethics. Since June 2017, when we first came together, we have spoken out on several occasions when we felt that constitutional values were under threat and that it was incumbent on us to voice our concerns publicly. As a group we have no affiliations with any political party nor do we subscribe to any ideology other than the values enshrined in the Constitution.

It is a measure of the rapid erosion of constitutional values that we, as a group, have felt a compelling need to speak out as many as nine times in the last eighteen months. The pace of erosion has been frightening and with each slip we seem to sink further into a lawless abyss.

The mob violence in Bulandshahr in Uttar Pradesh (U.P), on 3 December 2018, instigated and engineered with malicious intent, which led to the cold blooded murder of a police officer brave enough to step forward single-handedly to pacify the mob, marks the most dangerous turn yet in the direction taken by the politics of hate in recent times. It shows that in India’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, fundamental principles of governance, of constitutional ethics and of humane social conduct stand perverted. The Chief Minister of the state acts as a high priest of the agenda of bigotry and majoritarian supremacy – an agenda which now seems to take precedence over everything else.

Why is this incident such a frightening indicator of the complete collapse of constitutional values? This is not the first instance of a situation intentionally created to foment communal tension. The history of U.P. is replete with such instances. This is not the first time that a policeman has been killed by a frenzied mob. This is also not the first time that the politics of cow protection has been used as a means of isolating and cornering the Muslim community and deepening the social divide.

All this we have seen before but, so far, we had the confidence that whenever a political party actually forms a Government it keeps its partisan political agenda at bay and begins to exercise power with a sense of responsibility so as to gain wider political acceptability. The Bulandshahr episode, which follows a succession of events aimed at isolating and intimidating Muslim communities in U.P., shows that, under Yogi Adityanath, that confidence is misplaced and that hooliganism and thuggery have been mainstreamed into governance not just to intimidate minorities but to teach a lesson to anyone, including police personnel and others in the administration, who dare to be even handed in their approach to minority communities.

While it may be premature to come to conclusions about the murder of Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh before the investigations are over, there is no doubt that there was nothing spontaneous about the violence that led to his killing, nor is there any doubt as to who the political elements were that aided and abetted the violence. This was a deliberate attempt to display majoritarian muscle and send a message to the Muslim communities living in the region that they have to live in fear, accept their subordinate status and conform to the cultural diktats of the majority community.

Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh’s reputation of being independent and even-handed and his refusal to act in haste on the complaint of illegal cow slaughter that allegedly took place under his watch, was obviously seen as defiance of the majoritarian will. The local BJP and Sangh Parivar elements had already complained about his anti-Hindu conduct and sought his transfer. He was an impediment to their communal plans and had to go. Much as the Chief Minister may try to mislead by calling it an accident, this was murder with intent. It was murder most foul.

As horrifying as the brazen, daylight murder of a courageous police officer is the response of the administration to the event. The Chief Minister refuses to acknowledge the gravity of the incident and its communal intent, condemn the perpetrators of violence or direct the police to take action against them but instead asks them to focus attention on those responsible for illegal cow slaughter. The police authorities themselves draw an equivalence between the killing of a police officer and the illegal slaughter of cows and claim that unless both crimes are investigated together it will not be possible to come to any conclusions about the violence of the mob and the murder of a colleague.

Ample videographed evidence exists to show that those engaged in violence and their leaders, as well as those who egged them on, are allowed to roam scot-free while, at the same time, alleged cow killers, against whom not a shred of evidence exists, are taken into custody, just because they are Muslims. Three of the main accused in the mob violence leading to the death of the police officer flaunt their affiliations to the Sangh Parivar and one of them openly declares that the slain police officer was corrupt, friendly with Muslims and anti-Hindu, implying thereby that he deserved his fate.

World over, in any civilized society, the killing of a policeman is a more serious offence than any other crime, because it represents an assault on the very basis of that civilisation. It brooks no tolerance and even the most fractious of social and political groups come together to ensure that the perpetrators of such a crime are given exemplary punishment so that no one ever dares to attack the authority of law. In U.P. on the other hand we are witness to the entire administration, presided over by a Chief Minister who flaunts his bigotry as his badge of identity, preparing the ground not for bringing the perpetrators to book but for protecting them as defenders of faith and culture. This is the Rule of Lawlessness.

Our colleagues in service, in the Police and the Civil Administration appear, with honourable exceptions, to have capitulated readily to this perverted political order. They seem to have forgotten that their primary allegiance is to the Constitution and the Rule of Law, and that their constitutional status provides them an armour of such extraordinary strength that, had they taken steps to check the growing menace of the Hindutva brigade, they could certainly have prevented the outbreak of violence. Instead they not only allowed these hooligans to grow in confidence and gather political strength, they helped them gain impunity in their lawless actions.

Even now if they – the Chief Secretary, the Director General of Police, the Home Secretary, the District Magistrate and the district police authorities – stand together to uncover the insidious political agenda, identify its masterminds and bring the hooligans involved in the violence to book, they stand a chance to redeem their pledge to the Constitution and live up to the expectations that citizens have of the higher civil services.

Our Prime Minister, who is so voluble in his election campaigns and who never tires of telling us of how the Constitution of India is the only holy book he worships, maintains stony silence even as he sees a Chief Minister handpicked by him treat that same Constitution with sheer contempt. It is evident that, for the Sangh Parivar, constitutional morality is of no value and is necessarily subordinate to the ideals of majoritarian supremacy.

Never before in recent history has the politics of hate, division and exclusion been so dominant and the poisonous ideology which informs it penetrated so deep into the body politic. Never before has hate been directed with such calculated intent against minority communities, hate which is nursed, aided and abetted by those in power. Violence has been given social and political sanction and perpetrators of violence have been treated with kid gloves while victims have been punished and harassed.

This is a critical moment and we cannot take it lying down anymore. We call upon all citizens to unite in a crusade against the politics of hate and division – a politics which aims to destroy the fundamental principles on which our Republic is founded. We ask all citizens to whom constitutional values matter to join us in reasserting our sovereignty as citizens to:

  • Demand the resignation of the Chief Minister for his failure to abide by the Constitution to which he has sworn his allegiance. We know that this can happen, if together, we build a groundswell of public opinion by which we hold him accountable for his conduct and compel him to resign.
  • Remind the Chief Secretary, the Director General of Police, the Home Secretary, and all other members of the higher civil services concerned, of their constitutional duty to fearlessly implement the Rule of Law rather than the perverse dictates of their political masters.
  • Request the High Court at Allahabad to take suo motu cognizance of this incident and order a judicial enquiry supervised by them to uncover the true facts, expose the political collusion, fix responsibility and recommend action.
  • Work towards a citizen-led national campaign against the politics of hate and violence – in particular, the structural violence directed against Muslims, Adivasis, Dalits and women – violence which finds sustenance in the structures of political power.
  • Salute Inspector Subodh Kumar Singh for his bravery in standing up for constitutional values and refusing to yield to political pressure even at the cost of his life and for setting an example to his children and the younger generation that values matter more than career success. We also acknowledge and applaud the dignity with which his family has faced this crisis and their quiet resolve to uphold the principles for which Subodh Kumar

Singh sacrificed his life. His martyrdom will not be in vain.

  1. P. Ambrose IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Secretary, Ministry of Shipping & Transport, GoI
  2. L. Bajaj IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Administrative Reforms and Decentralisation Commission, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh
  3. Bala Baskar IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Adviser (Finance), Ministry of External Affairs, GoI
  4. Vappala Balachandran IPS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, GoI
  5. Gopalan Balagopal IAS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  6. Chandrashekhar Balakrishnan IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Coal, GoI
  7. Meeran C. Borwankar IPS (Retd.) Former DGP, Bureau of Police Research and Development, GoI
  8. Ravi Budhiraja IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, GoI
  9. Sundar Burra IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
  10. Kalyani Chaudhuri IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  11. Anna Dani IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
  12. Surjit K. Das IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Uttarakhand
  13. Vibha Puri Das IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, GoI
  14. R. DasguptaIAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Food Corporation of India, GoI
  15. Nareshwar Dayal IFS (Retd.)Former Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs and former High Commissioner to the United Kingdom
  16. Pradeep K. Deb IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Deptt. Of Sports, GoI
  17. Nitin Desai IES (Retd.) Former Secretary and Chief Economic Adviser, Ministry of Finance, GoI
  18. Keshav Desiraju IAS (Retd.) Former Health Secretary, GoI
  19. G. Devasahayam IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Govt. of Haryana
  20. Sushil Dubey IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Sweden
  21. P. Fabian IFS (Retd.)Former Ambassador to Italy
  22. Prabhu Ghate IAS (Retd.) Former Addl. Director General, Department of Tourism, GoI
  23. Arif Ghauri IRS (Retd.) Former Commissioner of Income Tax, GoI
  24. Gourisankar Ghosh IAS (Retd.) Former Mission Director, National Drinking Water Mission, GoI
  25. Hirak Ghosh IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  26. Tuktuk Ghosh IAS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary and Financial Adviser, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Shipping & Tourism, GoI
  27. Meena Gupta IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, GoI
  28. Ravi Vira Gupta IAS (Retd.) Former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India
  29. Deepa Hari IRS (Resigned)
  30. Vivek Harinarain IAS (Retd.) Govt. of Tamil Nadu
  31. Sajjad HassanIAS (Retd.) Former Commissioner (Planning), Govt. of Manipur
  32. M.A. Ibrahimi IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary (rank), Govt. of Bihar
  33. Kamal Jaswal IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Department of Information Technology, GoI
  34. Jagdish Joshi IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary (Planning), Govt. of Maharashtra
  35. Najeeb Jung IAS (Retd.)Former Lieutenant Governor, Delhi
  36. John Koshy IAS (Retd.)Former State Chief Information Commissioner, West Bengal
  37. Ajai KumarIndian Forest Service (Retd.) Former Director, Ministry of Agriculture, GoI
  38. Arun KumarIAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority, GoI
  39. Brijesh Kumar IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Department of Information Technology, GoI
  40. Harsh ManderIAS (Retd.) Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
  41. Aditi Mehta IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan
  42. Shivshankar Menon IFS (Retd.) Former Foreign Secretary and Former National Security Adviser
  43. Sonalini Mirchandani IFS (Resigned) GoI
  44. Sunil Mitra IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Finance, GoI
  45. Noor Mohammad IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, National Disaster Management Authority, Govt. of India
  46. Deb MukharjiIFS (Retd.) Former High Commissioner to Bangladesh and former Ambassador to Nepal
  47. Shiv Shankar Mukherjee IFS (Retd.)Former High Commissioner to the United Kingdom
  48. Pranab S. Mukhopadhyay IAS (Retd.) Former Director, Institute of Port Management, GoI
  49. NagalswamyIAS (Retd.) Former Principal Accountant General, Tamil Nadu & Kerala
  50. Amitabha PandeIAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Inter-State Council, GoI
  51. Niranjan Pant IA&AS (Retd.) Former Deputy Comptroller & Auditor General of India
  52. Alok PertiIAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Coal, GoI
  53. R. Raghunandan IAS (Retd.) Former Joint Secretary, Ministry of Panchayati Raj, GoI
  54. K. Raghupathy IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Staff Selection Commission, GoI
  55. P. RaiIAS (Retd.) Former Director General, National Skills Development Agency, GoI
  56. P. Raja IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission
  57. Babu Rajeev IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, GoI
  58. Y. Rao IAS (Retd.)
  59. Julio RibeiroIPS (Retd.) Former Adviser to Governor of Punjab & former Ambassador to Romania
  60. Aruna Roy IAS (Resigned)
  61. Manabendra N. RoyIAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  62. Deepak Sanan IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Adviser (AR) to Chief Minister, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh
  63. Shyam Saran IFS (Retd.)Former Foreign Secretary and Former Chairman, National Security Advisory Board
  64. C. Saxena IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Planning Commission, GoI
  65. Ardhendu SenIAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  66. Aftab Seth IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Japan
  67. Ashok Kumar Sharma IFS (Retd.)Former Ambassador to Finland and Estonia
  68. Navrekha SharmaIFS (Retd.)Former Ambassador to Indonesia
  69. Pravesh Sharma IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
  70. Raju SharmaIAS (Retd.) Former Member, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh
  71. Rashmi Shukla Sharma IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
  72. Ashok Vardhan Shetty IAS (Retd.) Former Vice Chancellor, Indian Maritime University, GoI
  73. Rajdip SinghIPS (Retd.) Former Special Director General, Border Security Force, GoI
  74. Sujatha SinghIFS (Retd.) Former Foreign Secretary, GoI
  75. Tirlochan Singh IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, National Commission for Minorities, GoI
  76. Jawhar Sircar IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Culture, GoI, & former CEO, Prasar Bharati
  77. Narendra Sisodia IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Finance, GoI
  78. Thanksy Thekkekera IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Minorities Development, Govt. of Maharashtra
  79. S.S. Thomas IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary General, National Human Rights Commission
  80. Geetha Thoopal IRAS (Retd.) Former General Manager, Metro Railway, Kolkata
  81. Hindal Tyabji IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary rank, Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir
  82. Ramani Venkatesan IAS (Retd.) Former Director General, YASHADA, Govt. of Maharashtra
  83. Arvind Verma IPS (Resigned)

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com