English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

Published

on

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Barring a section of cleric and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, political parties, social activists and most importantly the Muslim women who suffered due to the practice, all welcome the Supreme Court’s historic verdict

A sense of euphoria that went beyond communal and political identities engulfed large sections of India’s population, on Tuesday, as the Supreme Court struck down the “manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional” practice of Talaq-e-Biddat or triple talaq.

The landmark judgment passed by a Bench that comprised five judges, each of different faiths – Chief Justice of India JS Khehar (a Sikh), Justices Kurian Joseph (a Christian), Rohinton Nariman (a Parsi), S Abdul Nazeer (a Muslim), UU Lalit (a Hindu) – was immediately welcomed by all political parties, social activists and although predictably but most importantly, scores of Muslim women across India who have suffered due to the ‘unislamic’ practice.

Left sulking were the handful of Muslim clerics and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) who opposed the ban on instant triple talaq and lost – not just the legal battle but also their stranglehold on the rights of married Muslim women in India.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had personally advocated for an end to the practice (although his motive for the statement has often been attributed to his political concerns), took to Twitter to hail the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Expectedly, the entire spectrum of the BJP leadership – from national president Amit Shah to Union ministers Arun Jaitley, Ravi Shankar Prasad and UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath – reiterated Modi’s stand, the Congress party which had found itself in a piquant position over the case – with senior leader Kapil Sibal representing the AIMPLB in the court while Salman Khurshid was assisting the Bench as amicus curie – too welcomed the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]While Khurshid said: “What we hoped to happen has now happened, it is a good decision… Yeh faisla sachchai, vastvikta aur sahi Islam ko ujaagar karta hai”, his party colleague Sibal, who opposed several of Khurshid’s submissions in the court since he represented the AIMPLB which was against the ban, too seemed to reconcile with the verdict. “We hail the judgement, it protects personal laws and at the same time deprecates the practice of Triple Talaq,” Sibal said.

Randeep Singh Surjewala, the Congress party’s chief spokesperson, said: “The Supreme Court has set aside and quashed the practice of ‘instant triple talaq’ or ‘talaq-e-bidat’, which by itself was an aberration and adulteration of ‘talaq’, thereby recognizing the pristine form of religious practice in Islam that abhors any exploitation. This verdict is an affirmation of the rights of women and gives relief to them against being subjected to discrimination by a practice that had been perverted over the years. We welcome the acceptance of this reality by Court”.

Similar praise for the verdict came in from other political parties like Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Party, Trinamool Congress, the CPI and CPM.

The AIMPLB, which will hold a meeting of its executive committee in Bhopal on September 10 to discuss the Board’s future course of action, was evidently unhappy. Its senior member, Kamal Farooqui said: “Court order has affected the rights of religious minorities to practice their religion. It will have wide-ranging ramifications… Our feeling is that the judgment contravenes Constitutional guarantees”.

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief and Hyderabad MP, Asaduddin Owaisi, who has also been an opponent of any ban on triple talaq through judicial intervention, cautioned that though the “I respect the verdict but its implementation on the ground will be a Herculean task”.

Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen, who has often been the target of Islamic fundamentalists and has repeatedly challenged the oppression of women by a section of the Islamic clergy, however said that while the SC verdict may come as an embarrassment to the AIMPLB, it doesn’t ensure women’s freedom – which she insisted would only come through education.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’For former Union minister Arif Mohammad Khan, who had appeared in the SC for a bunch of petitioners seeking a ban on the controversial practice, the verdict came as sweet vindication of a stand he had consistently taken for the past 30 years. Khan, who had quit the Rajiv Gandhi government in the aftermath of the Shah Bano verdict when the then government cowered under pressure of the AIMPLB and radical Islamic clerics, said: “It is a historic verdict and I honestly feel that none of us can make a realistic assessment of the positive impact that this judgment is going to have on the Muslim community”.

“It will not only liberate Muslim women but also provide them with a sense of equality. It will provide them with a sense of empowerment. This verdict will bring about a paradigm shift and I foresee a changed scenario in the days when women will no longer accept instant talaq as a fait accompli. Empowered by the Supreme Court verdict, they will answer and retort back. They will tell their spouse that ‘This triple talaq is unconstitutional. I am not going to leave the house, you can leave the house’… This is going to be a game-changer for Muslim women”, Khan said.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

21 police personnel injured in mob violence during Nashik dargah demolition

21 police officers were injured and 15 people detained after violence erupted during a high court-directed demolition of an unauthorised dargah in Nashik’s Kathe Galli area.

Published

on

Police vehicles damaged during Nashik demolition violence

In a violent turn of events during an anti-encroachment drive, 21 police personnel sustained injuries and three police vehicles were damaged in Nashik’s Kathe Galli area late Tuesday night. The incident occurred when a mob resisted the demolition of the unauthorised Satpeer Baba Dargah, which was being removed in compliance with a Bombay High Court directive.

Police resort to teargas and lathi-charge to restore order

According to Nashik Police Commissioner Sandeep Karnik, the situation escalated when a large crowd assembled at Usmania Chowk to oppose the dargah’s removal. The trustees of the religious structure had already begun the process of dismantling the structure earlier that night, but the gathering quickly turned violent, with stone-pelting directed at police and community leaders attempting to calm the crowd.

To disperse the mob, police deployed mild force, including lathi-charge and teargas shells. Despite the violence, authorities brought the situation under control by early morning, and the dargah was successfully removed around 6 am on Wednesday.

15 detained, 57 motorcycles seized; FIR process underway

Deputy Commissioner of Police Kirankumar Chavan confirmed that 15 individuals have been detained in connection with the violence. Additionally, 57 motorcycles believed to belong to suspects have been seized. An FIR is being filed against those responsible for the attacks.

Nearly 50 municipal personnel from the Nashik Municipal Corporation (NMC) participated in the demolition, aided by four excavators, six trucks, and two dumpers. Civic officials stated that the drive was a continuation of previous actions taken in February, during which several unauthorised structures around the dargah were removed.

Tensions over the site

The Satpeer Baba Dargah had been at the center of local controversy, with some residents and members of Hindu outfits previously demanding its removal, claiming it was an illegal structure. Nashik Central MLA Devyani Pharande had also raised concerns, stating that earlier demolition efforts were incomplete and that the site should be entirely cleared.

As of now, police officials report that the situation in the area remains peaceful and under control.

Continue Reading

India News

National Herald row reignites BJP-Congress face-off amid ED chargesheet

BJP has reignited its attack on the Gandhi family, accusing them of a corporate conspiracy in the National Herald case, while Congress dismisses the ED action as a political vendetta by the Modi government.

Published

on

A political slugfest has erupted once again between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress following the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) chargesheet naming Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the alleged money laundering case tied to the now-defunct National Herald newspaper. The BJP has termed the case a textbook example of “corporate conspiracy,” while the Congress has decried the move as an act of “political vendetta” by the Narendra Modi-led central government.

BJP questions Gandhi family’s property acquisition through Young India Ltd

Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad, addressing a press briefing, accused the Congress of orchestrating a corporate arrangement to transfer property into the Gandhi family’s hands. He highlighted that in 2008, after the National Herald ceased publication, the Congress gave ₹90 crore to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), the newspaper’s publisher — a transaction he claims violates the norms as political parties are barred from funding private entities.

AJL reportedly failed to repay the loan, after which a non-profit entity, Young India Limited (YIL) — in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi each hold a 38% stake — acquired the company’s shares and, by extension, its properties across several Indian cities. Mr. Prasad questioned YIL’s charitable work and highlighted that a token amount of ₹50 lakh was paid to AJL before the remaining loan was written off.

“This is the Gandhi model of development,” Prasad said, alleging that the arrangement enabled the Gandhi family to take control of property worth thousands of crores.

BJP expands attack to Robert Vadra

The BJP leader also took aim at Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s husband, Robert Vadra, citing alleged irregularities in land transactions. “Another member buys land for ₹3 crore and sells it for ₹58 crore. The country should learn from this Gandhi model,” he remarked sarcastically.

Congress fights back, terms case a political smokescreen

The Congress has launched protests across the country in response to the BJP’s remarks and the ED’s chargesheet. Senior leader Pawan Khera likened the current actions to pre-Independence times, stating, “Back then, the British hated National Herald, the Gandhi family and the Congress — today the RSS has taken that place.”

Calling the case baseless, Congress leader Sachin Pilot said, “There has been no exchange of funds or transfer of property rights. This case is politically motivated, and the Modi government is attempting to silence the voice of the Opposition.” He affirmed that the party has full faith in the judiciary and will fight the case legally.

Continue Reading

India News

Priyanka Gandhi accompanies Robert Vadra to ED office for second day in Gurugram land probe

Robert Vadra, husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi, appeared before the ED for the second day in the Gurugram land case.

Published

on

Robert Vadra Priyanka Gandhi

Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra accompanied her husband Robert Vadra to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) office on Wednesday as he appeared for questioning for the second consecutive day in connection with the Gurugram land case.

Mr Vadra, the brother-in-law of Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, was seen exchanging a hug with Ms Gandhi before entering the ED office. He is under scrutiny in a money laundering probe linked to a 2008 land deal in Manesar-Shikohpur area, now known as Sector 83 of Gurugram.

Focus of the probe: land deal from Congress tenure in Haryana

The investigation stems from a land transaction executed by Skylight Hospitality Pvt Ltd, a company in which Mr Vadra was formerly a director. In February 2008, Skylight purchased 3.5 acres of land from Onkareshwar Properties for ₹7.5 crore. At that time, Haryana was governed by a Congress-led administration under then Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda.

In September 2012, four years after the acquisition, Skylight sold the same land to real estate developer DLF for ₹58 crore. The deal later drew public attention after senior IAS officer Ashok Khemka, who was then heading the Land Consolidation and Land Records department in Haryana, cancelled the land mutation, citing violations of the State Consolidation Act and procedural discrepancies.

Haryana Police registered an FIR to examine the deal in 2018, further intensifying the legal scrutiny.

ED questions Vadra under PMLA

On Tuesday, Mr Vadra was questioned for nearly five hours by the ED under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), during which his statement was recorded. The businessman has consistently maintained that the case is part of a political vendetta and emphasized that he has cooperated fully with all investigative agencies, submitting numerous documents over the years.

Calling for a closure to what he described as a decades-old matter, Mr Vadra said cases like these should not be allowed to drag on indefinitely.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com