English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Corona treatment in Pvt Hospitals: SC seeks reply from Centre, Pvt hospital orgs.

Supreme Court Bench of Chief Justice S. A. Bobde, Justice AS Bopanna and Justice Hrishikesh Roy heard petition filed by lawyer Sachin Jain, seeking a cap on the amount charged by private hospitals in treating COVID 19 patients, and the tariff under Ayushmann Bharat should be made applicable to everybody.

Published

on

The Supreme Court on Thursday sought replies from the Centre and some private hospital organisations on capping corona treatment costs in private hospitals.

Supreme Court Bench of Chief Justice S. A. Bobde, Justice AS Bopanna and Justice Hrishikesh Roy heard petition filed by lawyer Sachin Jain, seeking a cap on the amount charged by private hospitals in treating COVID 19 patients, and the tariff under Ayushmann Bharat should be made applicable to everybody.

On the last hearing, the SC had asked the government to identify private hospitals, especially those that received land at a concessional rate from the government, which could treat Covid-19 patients either free or for nominal fees.

In today’s hearing, the CJI noted: “There is an earlier judgment of Justice Lodha that says these hospitals should treat certain number of patients for free. we are only talking of hospitals running on land given by the government or charitable trusts. Please ensure they do some service. Why can’t these hospitals treat a certain number of patients for free?”

Senior lawyer Harish Salve, appearing for Healthcare Federation, told the Bench that “anybody who has received land from govt on concessional rates do provide free beds and treatment. There is a judgment to this extent. 25% of our beds are free”.

 “Revenues for hospitals have fallen. People have stopped coming to hospitals due to COVID reasons. Ayushman Bharat is a heavily discounted scheme. Private hospitals revenue is down by 60  to 70 percent,” Salve said. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for an association of hospitals, highlighted the plight of private hospitals.

“Sir Ganga Ram hospital has been converted into a COVID hospital. No business is left and it will lead to closing down of hospitals if the prayers are complied with.”

CJI Bobde then remarked: “You are making a sacrifice for a good cause.”

Demanding the tariff under Ayushmann Bharat should be made applicable to everybody, petitioner Sanjay Jain said: “Covid-19 treatment,  packages are well defined and are available in Ayushman Bharat. The average daily bill is Rs 4000. But, the hospital charges Rs. 50000 from the adjoining patient who is not the beneficiary under the scheme.”

The Bench then asked the petitioner whether an only-cost basis treatment for private hospitals dealing with COVID-19 treatment would be acceptable. Jain also said that the government should support citizens and not corporate hospitals.

“The Health minister has also said that in this crisis we have to involve the private sector as a key partner,” said Jain.

Appearing for the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta interjected, “Ayushman Bharat is a scheme devised by the government with identified categories of beneficiaries, like rag pickers, daily wage workers etc. All people who can’t afford are covered by this scheme, but the petitioner wants to make it applicable to all. We have put in our affidavit how it works. The petitioner is saying that the government is supporting private hospitals but the government is doing its best for lowest strata of the society.”

The Court asked the Centre and some private hospital organisations to file their reply and posted the matter for final arguments after two weeks.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com