The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail applications of activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and seven others accused in Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) linked to the alleged conspiracy behind the February 2020 riots in the national capital.
A division bench of Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Shalinder Kaur announced the verdict, stating, all the appeals are dismissed. The detailed judgment is awaited. The order came after the bench had reserved its decision on July 9.
The accused, including Khalid, Imam, Mohd Saleem Khan, Shifa Ur Rehman, Athar Khan, Meeran Haider, Abdul Khalid Saifi, Gulfisha Fatima, and Shadab Ahmed, have been in custody since 2020. They had approached the High Court challenging a trial court’s decision denying them bail.
The prosecution maintained that the riots were not an unplanned eruption but the result of a deliberate conspiracy designed to harm India’s reputation internationally. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the prosecution, submitted before the court that prolonged incarceration could not be considered a valid ground for bail. He further stated that anyone acting against the country should remain in jail until acquitted.
The accused, however, claimed innocence. Counsel for Imam maintained that his client was completely disconnected from the violence, the co-accused, and the location of the riots, emphasizing that neither his speeches nor his WhatsApp messages called for violence.
The February 2020 riots, which erupted during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC), left 53 people dead and over 700 injured. Khalid, Imam, and others were booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and several provisions of the IPC for allegedly being the masterminds behind the violence.
While some co-accused in the case have already secured bail, Khalid, Imam, and others cited prolonged imprisonment and parity grounds in their pleas. However, Delhi Police opposed the applications, calling the riots a case of clinical and pathological conspiracy.
Police further alleged that speeches by Khalid, Imam, and others followed a common pattern of creating fear by invoking issues like CAA-NRC, the Babri Masjid, triple talaq, and Kashmir. They also rejected claims of delaying the trial, insisting that the right to a speedy trial cannot serve as a free pass.