English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Delhi metro second most unaffordable in the world: CSE study

Published

on

Delhi Metro

Delhi metro, whose fares were nearly doubled last year, is the second most unaffordable transport network in the world after Hanoi in Vietnam, said a study by Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).

After the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) hiked tariff twice last year, in May and October, metro fares nearly doubled: the maximum went up from Rs.30 to Rs.50 and then to Rs.60.

As a consequence, the CSE study shows, the Delhi Metro has received nearly 32 percent less, or a drop of approximately 4.2 lakh passengers, this year than the number of daily passengers it had hoped to serve.

While the average daily ridership projections made by DMRC in 2016 stood at around 40 lakh for this year, it has been only around 27 lakh — 31.66 percent less than the projections, the study said.

This, say CSE experts, “is symptomatic of the lack of overall policy for pricing of all transport services and a lack of strategy for funding of these systems and increasing ridership.”

The fare hikes have rendered Delhi metro unaffordable for the common masses. A middle-income commuter of the Delhi Metro on an average spends 19.5% of her income on travel, the CSE data showed. Experts from the organisation said a commuter should not have to spend more than 15% of the income on any mode of transport.

In case of the economically weaker sections, this percentage share increases to 22% of their income.

Affordability is defined as the percentage of commuters’ total income spent on travel.

The calculations, based on the fourth Fare Fixation Committee (FFC) report for the Delhi Metro, showed that 30% of Delhi’s commuters are within the monthly group of Rs 20,000.

Gautam Patel, principal consultant (coordinates), Ahmedabad, and Gaurav Dubey, Programme Manager at Clean Air and Sustainable Mobility at CSE, said that no transit system should ask its users to spend more than 15% of their earnings on their services. In case of lower income groups, the share should not be over 10%, he said.

For example, an unskilled labourer in Delhi earning a minimum daily wage of Rs 534 on an average spends Rs 80 (15%) out of her income on transport. As per CSE’s calculations, she would spend around 8% of her income if she travels in a non air-conditioned public bus, 14% in an air-conditioned bus, and 22% travelling in Delhi Metro.

“There is no doubt that the quality of services provided by the Delhi Metro is good but the fares need to be kept in mind too,” Patel said.

Varsha Joshi, Delhi’s transport commissioner, said the fare hikes were needed to improve the quality of a transport network. However, these need to be introduced gradually.

“The question is, how much fare is affordable for a particular quality if ride. Indexing of fares is a possibility, where fares can be incrementally increased indexed to inflation,” Joshi said.

The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) defended these fare revisions, saying these were revised after a gap of nine years, during which there was an increase of almost 90% in power tariffs and other input costs.

“The fares were revised by an independent FFC through a well-defined mechanism and not by the DMRC itself,” said Anuj Dayal, executive director (corporate communications), DMRC.

Dayal said this year the Metro has already expanded its network by more than 60km and will have a network of 350km in the coming months.

“The Delhi Metro is providing an eco-friendly and convenient travel option and periodic fare revisions are imperative to sustain such infrastructure projects in the long run,” he said.

Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, last year, termed the fare hike “too steep”. Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia called the metro fare hike a “conspiracy” to benefit private cab aggregator services like Uber and Ola.

Before the hike, Union Urban Development Minister Hardeep Singh Puri had told the Delhi government that it would need to pay Rs. 3,000 crore annually for five years if it wanted to stop the metro fare hike.

Kejriwal responded that his government was ready to provide half the funds needed to meet the gap in the metro’s finances for three months, if it was allowed to take over its operation. This was turned down by Puri who wrote back: “While I appreciate your confidence, enthusiasm and keenness to take on more responsibility, I am constrained to point out that this again is also not in line with existing policy.”

When Delhi Metro started operating in 2002, the minimum fare was Rs. 4 and maximum was Rs. 8.

India News

IIT Bombay Professor Suryanarayana Doolla sent on leave amid student suicide row

IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla has been sent on leave amid the ongoing student protests following Sahil Wakode’s death.

Published

on

IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla has been sent on leave amid the ongoing controversy following the death of 20-year-old student Sahil Wakode, with protests on the campus seeking action against the professor.

Doolla, a faculty member in IIT Bombay’s Department of Energy Science and Engineering, had been involved in the examination incident concerning Wakode. The student was allegedly found using a mobile phone during a mid-semester examination and had uploaded the question paper to an AI platform to seek answers, according to the institute.

Why Suryanarayana Doolla is at the centre of the controversy

Doolla was the course instructor and examination invigilator during the examination and was involved in reporting the alleged examination malpractice to the institute’s authorities.

IIT Bombay has said Wakode was subsequently counselled by the instructor and the Head of Department and was assured that the examination incident would not adversely affect his academic career. The institute has also maintained that no disciplinary action had been initiated against the student before his death.

Wakode’s family, however, alleged harassment and caste-based discrimination. Mumbai Police registered a case based on the family’s complaint, with Doolla among those named. The allegations remain subject to investigation.

Student protests at IIT Bombay

Following Wakode’s death, students began protesting on the IIT Bombay campus and demanded action against Doolla.

IIT Bombay Director Professor Shireesh Kedare met the protesting students on September 20 and signed an 18-point charter of demands. The demands included action against Doolla.

Doolla was subsequently removed from the post of Dean Students Welfare amid the protests. The latest action comes as the controversy surrounding Wakode’s death and the allegations against the professor continue to be investigated.

Faculty members back Doolla

While students have demanded action against Doolla, IIT Bombay’s Faculty Forum has backed the professor, saying he was performing his duties as an invigilator and had followed the institute’s prescribed procedure after detecting the alleged examination malpractice.

The controversy involves the examination incident, allegations made by Wakode’s family and the police investigation into his death. The allegations against Doolla have not been established as facts and remain part of the ongoing investigation.

Continue Reading

India News

Amit Shah sets 2029 deadline to make India drug-free

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set December 31, 2029 as the deadline for India’s fight against drugs, urging states to focus on dismantling trafficking networks rather than only recording seizures.

Published

on

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set December 31, 2029 as the deadline for India’s campaign against drugs, calling on states and Union Territories to move beyond recording seizures and focus on dismantling the networks behind narcotics trafficking.

Speaking at the third National Conference of Anti-Narcotics Task Force Heads in New Delhi on Tuesday, Mr Shah said India would not allow drugs to enter or leave the country.

“Neither will we allow a single gram of drugs to enter India, nor will we allow a single gram of drugs to go out,” he said.

The conference brought together police chiefs from 36 states and Union Territories as the government outlined its roadmap for tackling the country’s drug problem.

Amit Shah asks states to focus on drug networks

Mr Shah said drug seizures alone should not be treated as the measure of success. He called for a shift from meetings to missions, reports to results and seizures to dismantling the networks responsible for drug trafficking.

Districts have been identified as the frontline units in the strategy. They are to be assessed based on whether they are involved in drug production or entry, serve as transit corridors or primarily face drug consumption.

The response would then be tailored according to the nature of the threat in each district.

The Home Minister also stressed the need to follow the money generated by narcotics trafficking, including through investigations into bank accounts and shell transactions that help sustain drug networks.

Synthetic drugs, darknet and crypto payments in focus

The government is also preparing for emerging methods used by drug traffickers, with synthetic drugs, darknet marketplaces, cryptocurrency payments and dead-drop deliveries identified as areas requiring greater attention.

Mr Shah urged states to develop specialised teams capable of investigating these newer forms of narcotics trafficking.

The government also wants foreign nationals involved in drug supply chains to face deportation and blacklisting, while those operating supply networks into India from abroad are to be pursued for extradition.

2026-2029 drug control roadmap

The government’s Vision Document 2026-2029 is based on four pillars: enforcement and intelligence, control of precursor chemicals and synthetic drugs, demand and harm reduction, and capacity building.

According to the report, the document contains more than 100 individual targets.

The Nashamukt Mitra programme is another part of the campaign. Nearly 47,000 volunteers have registered so far, with a target of reaching one lakh volunteers. The programme plans to take awareness activities to around 10 lakh schools and colleges.

The government has also launched new television advertisements against drug use, redesigned the Narcotics Control Bureau website and laid the foundation stones for NCB zonal complexes in Lucknow and Dehradun.

Mr Shah linked the anti-drug campaign to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of a developed India by 2047, arguing that protecting the country’s young population from narcotics is essential to that goal.

Continue Reading

India News

J&K Assembly uproar over Maharaja Hari Singh, Sheikh Abdullah holidays

A holiday row over Maharaja Hari Singh and Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah triggered an uproar in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, with BJP and NC members raising competing slogans.

Published

on

The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly witnessed a heated exchange on Tuesday over public holidays associated with Maharaja Hari Singh and Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, with members of the ruling National Conference (NC) and BJP raising slogans in support of the respective leaders.

The issue was raised a day before the September 23 public holiday marking Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary.

NC legislator Abdul Majid Larmi demanded that the holiday for Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary be withdrawn if the public holiday for Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah’s birth anniversary was not restored.

The demand led to an uproar in the House, with BJP members raising slogans in support of Maharaja Hari Singh and accusing the NC of insulting his legacy. NC legislators responded with slogans supporting Sheikh Abdullah.

What happened over the holiday issue

The Centre withdrew the public holiday marking Sheikh Abdullah’s birth anniversary after the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. His birth anniversary is observed on December 5.

The government also discontinued the public holiday on July 13, which was observed as Martyrs’ Day in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

In contrast, September 23, Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary, is now observed as a public holiday in Jammu and Kashmir.

PDP members also joined the discussion and demanded the restoration of the July 13 public holiday.

Speaker says he has no power over holidays

As slogan-shouting continued in the Assembly, Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather attempted to calm the members.

The Speaker said that the authority to declare or withdraw public holidays did not fall within his jurisdiction.

Why July 13 was observed as Martyrs’ Day

July 13 was traditionally observed as a public holiday in Jammu and Kashmir. Official functions were held at the Martyrs’ Graveyard to commemorate the 22 people killed during the 1931 uprising against the Dogra monarchy under British rule.

Following the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of the erstwhile state into two Union Territories in 2019, July 13 was removed from the list of public holidays. Official commemorations and ceremonial police tributes were also discontinued.

The 1931 killings and the unrest that followed led to the appointment of two commissions to examine grievances of the Muslim community in Kashmir and eventually contributed to limited political reforms.

The first Assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir were held in 1934, although the Maharaja retained extensive powers over key matters at the time.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com