English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

A Dramatic, Powerful Initiative

Published

on

(L to R) Former law secretary P K Malhotra, Supreme Court judge Justice N V Ramana, Former Supreme Court judge Justice B N Krishna, Editor of India Legal, Inderjit Badhwar and Chief Justice of Bombay High Court Justice Pradeep Mandar in the Legal Leadership Conclave /Photo: Anil Shakya

Above: (L to R) Former law secretary P K Malhotra, Supreme Court judge Justice N V Ramana, Former Supreme Court judge Justice B N Srikrishna, Editor-in- Chief of India Legal, Inderjit Badhwar and Chief Justice of Bombay High Court Justice Pradeep Nandrajog in the Legal Leadership Conclave /Photo: Anil Shakya

By Inderjit Badhwar

As the first and only weekly, independent politico-legal journal that covers an entire gamut of legal news and developments in the country, India Legal magazine has constantly endeavoured to promote the spread of legal education. This approach forms the bedrock of all our media initiatives, including the widely acclaimed news channels APN TV and N1 News. Both carry national news as well as in-depth, interactive legal programmes, including a live, daily legal helpline.

India Legal weekly, APN TV and N1 News channels are a part of the ENC Group which takes great pride and responsibility in promoting new ideas, initiatives, and recommendations for the benefit of not only the legal fraternity but also society at large. In continuing with this tradition, we are pleased to inform our readers about the launch of a series of Legal Leadership Conclaves in partnership with the Supreme Court Bar Association and various national law universities and state legal authorities.

While it is common to hear of leadership summits and conclaves which focus on themes like politics, business, technology, arts and culture, it’s rather rare to have a forum exclusively dedicated to the exchange of ideas on law.

The Legal Leadership Conclave is a significant attempt by the ENC Group to fill that void. These conclaves are being held nationwide on a wide range of contemporary legal issues with the participation of sitting judges of the Supreme Court and high courts and several other legal luminaries and thought leaders.

By the time this issue hits the stands, we would have hosted the first of these events on April 27, 2019, at the St Regis Hotel, Mumbai, with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as the topic for discussion.

Joining hands with India Legal for this Conclave are the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), the Maharashtra National Law University, Mumbai (MNLU) and the India Legal Research Foundation (ILRF), all leading institutions in their own right. The SCBA, which works tirelessly in upholding the professionalism and integrity of Supreme Court lawyers, is an important pillar of our legal system.

Our second partner, MNLU, is one of the youngest national law universities and is already taking great strides by attracting some of the brightest minds in the country. Our third partner, the ENC Group-promoted ILRF, is a non-profit organisation which is committed to bringing justice to those who deserve it but cannot afford it.

At the time we were planning the Mumbai conclave a few weeks back, the IBC emerged as the topic for discussion almost unanimously, the reasons for which are not hard to fathom. The IBC is a major economic reform initiated in the country in recent times to provide for a time-bound insolvency resolution process. Since it was enacted in 2016, as many as 12,000 insolvency cases have been filed under it and around Rs 1 lakh crore has been recovered through insolvency proceedings. Before the introduction of the IBC, it took companies about four to five years to dissolve their operations; now the time has dropped drastically to a year.

As with any new legislation, however, the IBC’s smooth implementation has been riddled with many issues that had not been thought of at the time of drafting the legislation. Some of these issues have been addressed by way of legislative amendments and court orders. This conclave proffered another opportunity for various stakeholders to deliberate on several aspects such as practical issues in the insolvency resolution process and recent developments in the IBC as well as a prognosis of what is to come.

—India Legal

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com