English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Top legal luminaries deliberate on Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code at India Legal Conclave

Published

on

Top legal luminaries deliberate on Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code at India Legal Conclave

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The first ever Legal Leadership Conclave, organised by India Legal Research Foundation (ILRF) and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) in association with others, held in Mumbai on Saturday, April 27, evaluated the impact of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the challenges ahead.

The law that has been in existence for three years now is a landmark law is hailed as a major step for economic reform.

Supreme Court Justice NV Ramana, who inaugurated the conclave, said in his opening remarks that with the IBC code having been around for three years, it was time to take a look at its functioning. “The IBC is one of the key reforms in the field of commercial law undertaken in the last two decades and now that it has been around for three years, it is time to reflect on its journey and discuss ways to smoothen its functioning,” he said.

“In recent times, non-performing assets have threatened to cripple our banking system and have taken the wind out of the sails of our economic growth, said Justice Ramana, adding that the IBC was enacted to provide for a time-bound insolvency resolution mechanism.

“In three years since its enactment, 12,000 insolvency cases have been filed under it and around Rs 1 lakh crore have been recovered through insolvency proceedings,” he observed and added that the object behind enacting the IBC was to consolidate the existing framework by creating a single law for Insolvency and Bankruptcy.

Justice NV Ramana lighting the lamp. Also seen are MD, APN News Rajshri Rai (standing behind him) and Editor-in-Chief India legal Inderjit Badhwar (second from right).

Justice NV Ramana lighting the lamp. Also seen are MD, APN News Rajshri Rai (standing behind him) and Editor-in-Chief India legal Inderjit Badhwar (second from right).

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The conclave, that had two sessions, had a line up of speakers that included some of the best authorities to speak on the subject. Other than Justice NV Ramana of the Supreme Court, among those who spoke are: PK Malhotra, former law secretary; Justice BN Srikrishna, former SC judge; Editor-in-chief, India Legal, Inderjit Badhwar; Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, chief justice of the Bombay High Court.

The event is a launch pad for a series of conclaves being held nationwide on a wide range of contemporary legal issues with the participation of sitting judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts and several other legal luminaries and thought leaders. The SCBA which works tirelessly towards protecting the interests of the Supreme Court lawyers is an important pillar of our legal system. The ENC Group-promoted ILRF, is a non-profit organization which is committed to bring justice to those who deserve it but cannot afford it.

India legal is the first and only weekly, independent politico-legal magazine that covers an entire gamut of legal news and developments in the country and which  has constantly endeavoured to promote the cause of legal education. This approach also forms the bedrock of media initiatives of the ENC group, including the widely acclaimed news channels, APN TV and N1 News.  The ENC Group takes great pride and responsibility in promoting new ideas, initiatives, and recommendations for the benefit of not only the legal fraternity but also society at large. It is in continuing with this tradition that the Legal Leadership Conclave is being held today. The event is being held in partnership with the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and India Legal Research Foundation (ILRF), APN TV and Nepal 1.

The IBC has emerged as the topic for discussion, the reasons for which are not hard to fathom. Before the introduction of the IBC, it took companies about four to five years to dissolve their operations; now the time has dropped drastically to a year.

However, as with any new legislation, the IBC’s smooth implementation has been riddled with many issues that had not been thought of at the time of drafting the legislation. Some of these issues have been addressed by way of legislative amendments and court orders while many more were discussed at the daylong conclave.

As mentioned above, the conclave was held in two sessions.

The Technical Session I

Subject: Opportunities and Challenges for IBC

The speakers at the session included Mukulita Vijayawargiya, member (IBBI); VP Singh (NCLT member); Mohan Bhaskar Pantulu (NCLT member); TK Vishwanathan, former secretary general, Lok Sabha; and Som Sekhar Sundaresan, advocate. Justice BR Gavai of the Bombay High Court chaired the panel.

Technical Session II

Subject: Impact of IBC on business establishments and the real estate sector

The speakers at this session were: Ravi Kumar Duraisamy (member NCLT); Justice J Bharati Dangre of the Bombay High Court; Justice V. Nallasenapathy (member NCLT); Soli Cooper, advocate; OP Bhatt, director ONGC and ex-chairman IBA; Jana Kalyan Das, senior advocate; and former SCBA president PH Parekh. Justice Dangre was the chairperson of the session

There were two rounds of Q&A where discerning questions related to IBC were asked.

Valedictory Session

This was attended by Justice Nandrajog, Justice Ramana and senior advocate Janak Dwarka Das. Justice Ramana concluded the event

The Vote of Thanks was delivered by India Legal’s Editor-in-Chief Inderjit Badhwar.

Read the full speech of Justice N V Ramana here

Watch the full speech here

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov criticises India restriction, says leak networks shifted to other apps

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has responded to India’s temporary restriction on the platform ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, arguing that the move affected ordinary users without stopping alleged leak networks.

Published

on

Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has criticised India’s decision to temporarily restrict access to the messaging platform, arguing that the move failed to curb alleged exam leak operations and instead affected millions of legitimate users.

The restriction was imposed ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination as authorities sought to prevent the spread of leaked exam-related material and disrupt networks allegedly involved in malpractice.

In a public response, Durov said the action had inconvenienced a large number of users across India while those responsible for sharing leaked content had simply migrated to alternative platforms.

According to Durov, restricting access to Telegram did not eliminate the problem authorities were trying to address. He claimed that groups involved in distributing exam-related leaks quickly shifted their activities elsewhere, raising questions about the effectiveness of platform-specific restrictions.

The temporary curbs were announced by the government in the lead-up to the NEET-UG re-test scheduled for June 21. Officials said the move was aimed at safeguarding the integrity of the examination process following concerns about the circulation of leaked material online.

The restriction is currently expected to remain in place until June 22.

Durov also stressed that millions of Indian users rely on Telegram for communication, education, business activities and community engagement. He argued that measures targeting an entire platform can have wider consequences for users who have no connection to alleged wrongdoing.

The government’s action came amid broader efforts to prevent cheating and malpractice in competitive examinations. Authorities have been closely monitoring digital platforms and messaging services after reports that exam-related content was being circulated through online channels.

The debate has sparked discussions about how governments and technology platforms should balance examination security with access to digital communication services. While officials maintain that strong measures are necessary to protect the fairness of high-stakes examinations, critics argue that restrictions on entire platforms may not effectively stop determined offenders.

For now, Telegram remains at the centre of the discussion as authorities continue efforts to ensure a fair and secure conduct of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination.

Continue Reading

India News

Telegram restricted ahead of NEET-UG re-exam, NTA backs move to curb exam fraud

NTA has welcomed the Centre’s decision to temporarily restrict Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, citing the need to prevent fraud and misinformation.

Published

on

NEET

The Centre has imposed temporary restrictions on messaging platform Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, with the National Testing Agency (NTA) welcoming the decision as part of efforts to prevent exam-related fraud and misinformation.

The temporary curbs will remain in place until June 22, a day after the NEET-UG re-exam scheduled for June 21. Authorities said the action was taken following concerns that the platform was being misused by cheating networks and individuals circulating misleading claims related to the examination.

NTA says move aimed at protecting exam integrity

According to the NTA, the restrictions are intended to safeguard candidates from fraudulent activities and false information that could affect the fairness of the examination process. The agency stated that maintaining the integrity of the re-examination remains a priority as lakhs of students prepare to appear for the test.

The NEET-UG re-exam is being conducted after the original examination was cancelled amid allegations of question paper leaks and irregularities. Since then, authorities have been monitoring online platforms for suspicious activity and misleading content targeting candidates.

Restrictions linked to concerns over fake paper leak claims

In recent weeks, several reports surfaced about Telegram channels allegedly offering access to leaked examination papers. The NTA had repeatedly advised students not to trust such claims and referred suspicious links and posts for verification by cybercrime authorities. No official confirmation of any genuine leaked re-exam paper had been issued.

Authorities believe the temporary restrictions will help limit the spread of fake content and reduce opportunities for organised exam fraud in the days leading up to the re-test.

Wider efforts to secure the re-examination

The government and examination authorities have introduced several measures ahead of the re-exam, including monitoring social media platforms and creating channels for reporting suspicious claims related to NEET-UG 2026. The NTA has also urged candidates to rely only on official communications for updates regarding the examination.

With the re-examination approaching, officials say the latest action is part of a broader effort to ensure a fair and transparent process for all candidates.

Continue Reading

India News

Abhishek Banerjee says will not bow to BJP after nearly 11 hours of ED questioning

After spending nearly 11 hours before the Enforcement Directorate, TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee said he would not bow to the BJP and accused the ruling party of using investigative agencies for political purposes.

Published

on

Abhishek Banerjee

Trinamool Congress leader and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee on Tuesday said he would not bow to the BJP after spending nearly 11 hours being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an ongoing investigation.

Speaking after the questioning, Banerjee alleged that central agencies were being used to target opposition leaders and asserted that he would continue his political fight despite what he described as sustained pressure.

The TMC leader has repeatedly maintained that investigations involving him are politically motivated, a charge he has made on several previous occasions while appearing before central agencies.

His appearance before the ED comes amid a period of heightened political activity and multiple investigations involving leaders in West Bengal. Recent days have also seen Banerjee face summons and questioning in separate matters by state investigative agencies.

After leaving the ED office, Banerjee reiterated that he would not be intimidated and said he remained committed to his political responsibilities. He also accused the BJP of attempting to weaken opposition parties through investigative action, an allegation that the BJP has rejected in the past.

The Enforcement Directorate has not publicly commented on Banerjee’s remarks. The investigation related to the questioning remains ongoing.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com