English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Election Commission puts Constitutional block on BJP push for simultaneous polls

Published

on

Election Commission puts Constitutional block on BJP push for simultaneous polls

As the BJP got down in earnest to push for simultaneous polls, with party chief Amit Shah writing to Law Commission in favour of the move and the BJP thinking of having elections to 12 States along with Lok Sabha election next year, the Election Commission turned around and said ‘not possible’.

Chief Election Commissioner OP Rawat said on Tuesday, August 14, that parallel elections are not possible without a legal framework. He insisted that any extension or curtailment of the term of assemblies will require a constitutional amendment.

“If the term of some state assemblies needs to be curtailed or extended, then a constitutional amendment will be required… Logistics arrangements with regard to 100 percent availability of VVPATs (paper trail machines) will be a constraint,” Rawat told reporters to a question on whether simultaneous elections can be held anytime soon.

“On the issue of ‘one nation one poll’, the Election Commission had given inputs and suggestions in 2015 itself… Other requirements of additional police force, polling personnel would also be needed,” he said.

Rawat’s remarks came a day after the BJP made a strong pitch for simultaneous polls, with party chief Amit Shah arguing that one election would check expenditure and ensure that the nation is not in “election mode” throughout the year.

In an eight-page letter to Law Commission chairman Justice BS Chouhan, Shah said holding simultaneous polls is not only a concept but a principle that has been successfully tried in the past and can be implemented.

The BJP chief said the opposition to simultaneous elections seems to be politically motivated. Opposition parties have raised concern over the proposal, saying simultaneous elections would dilute India’s federal structure.

The CEC said the poll panel would continue to deliver its responsibility of conducting elections whenever term of the state assemblies come to an end.

The EC is still in the process of procuring new EVMs and VVPATs ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha polls. While all required EVMs — 13.95 lakh ballot units and 9.3 lakh control units — will be delivered by September 30, 16.15 lakh VVPATs will also be delivered well before the end of November, Rawat had earlier said.

Some additional VVPATs are being procured as a cushion in case these machines malfunction and need to be replaced during polls.

Over 11 per cent of the 10,300 VVPAT machines across 10 states had developed faults and had to be replaced during the May 28 bypolls.

If simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and state assemblies are held in 2019, the EC will require nearly 24 lakh EVMs, double the number required to hold only the Parliamentary polls.

A paper by the Law Commission had recently recommended holding the Lok Sabha and assembly polls in two phases beginning 2019.

Congress dares PM Modi to dissolve Lok Sabha, hold general elections with state polls this year

Meanwhile, even as Modi government was contemplating holding an all-party meet on the issue after the Law Commission recommends a legal framework on the matter, the Congress dared Prime Minister Narendra Modi to dissolve the Lok Sabha early and announce general elections along with polls in four states where the terms of the assemblies end this year.

Congress general secretary Ashok Gehlot today said postponing the upcoming state assembly elections and conducting these with Lok Sabha polls in 2019 is “not possible” under the Constitution or the law.

He said elections in Mizoram, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh will have to be conducted before the terms of these assemblies end. “There is only one way of holding simultaneous elections. The prime minister should dissolve the Lok Sabha and hold polls along with the four state assembly elections,” Gehlot told a press conference.

“The Congress will welcome it. We are prepared,” he said.

Rubbing it in, he said it will be in the “best interest of the country to dissolve the Lok Sabha early, given the all-pervasive atmosphere of fear, intolerance and intimidation.”

Gehlot said the ‘one nation, one election’ slogan is just a gimmick to deflect attention of people from government’s failures.

He also said the BJP was floating this idea because it fears the losing of upcoming state elections, in which case it will be in a very weak state to face the electorate in 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

Congress legal cell head Vivek Tankha said the party will move court if the government attempts to postpone upcoming state assembly elections. “This cannot be done without a constitutional amendment,” he said.

The government, seeking to evolve a consensus on holding simultaneous election to Lok Sabha and state assemblies, is considering convening an all-party meeting on the issue after the Law Commission recommends a legal framework on the matter.

The government is awaiting the report of the law panel which would lay down the legal framework of holding the two elections together. Once the report is with the government, it will have broad talking points, said media reports.

The law panel, which is examining the feasibility of holding simultaneous polls, had earlier sought the views of political parties before finalising its report.

Both the BJP and the Congress had stayed away from the consultation organised by the commission. The Congress had met the commission top brass recently where it had opposed the concept of simultaneous polls.

Political parties are divided on the issue. Besides NDA constituent Shiromani Akali Dal, the AIADMK, the Samajwadi Party and the Telangana Rashtra Samiti have supported it.

The Congress, Trinamool Congress, Aam Aadmi Party, DMK, Telugu Desam Party, Left parties and the JDS have opposed the proposal.

ABP-CVoter Survey predicts Congress majority in three State polls, BJP win in Lok Sabha

Even as these moves are on, an opinion poll survey conducted by CVOTER and news channel ABP said the BJP would lose all three of the upcoming Assembly elections in Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan to the Congress, but the Modi factor would help the party’s fortunes in the Lok Sabha election next year in the three states.

The survey stated that the Congress would gain a clear majority in all the three states in the elections, by winning 117 out of 230 seats in Madhya Pradesh, 54 out of 90 in Chhattisgarh and 130 out of 200 in Rajasthan. The BJP, on the other hand, would manage only 106, 33 and 57 seats in the three states respectively, the opinion poll predicted.

BJP’s way out

The opinion poll is likely to strengthen a buzz within the BJP, reported by The Indian Express, of the possibility of holding 12 state elections together in early 2019.

Under this, said the IE report quoting a BJP source, elections in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Mizoram could be postponed and President’s rule imposed in these states as the term of these assemblies ends in November-December. This envisages the resignation of the four Chief Ministers once the term of their respective assemblies ends. This could clear the way for President’s rule and elections can then be held along with general elections in early 2019.

States like Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Odisha vote with the Lok Sabha polls anyway. Assembly elections in Maharashtra, Haryana, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Jharkhand — all NDA-ruled — can also be advanced so that they are held along with Lok Sabha polls, sources told IE.

With this option, at least on paper, as many as a dozen states can go to polls simultaneously with Lok Sabha polls without changing any law. “The BJP Chief Ministers will honour the Constitution by resigning before their term ends. In fact, the party will get credit for such a move in the elections also,” the source added.

India News

In Manipur, Kuki-Zo groups launch counter-economic blockade

Published

on

By

Kuki-Zo organisations on Thursday launched a counter-economic blockade in Manipur, demanding that the Centre and the state government ensure uninterrupted movement of essential commodities to the hill districts amid renewed tensions over access to the highways.

The counter-blockade comes in response to the ongoing disruption of traffic on Manipur’s major transport routes with Kuki-Zo groups alleging restrictions on goods have hit residents of hill areas. They urged authorities to restore the free movement of food, medicines, fuel and other essential supplies, saying civilians should not bear the weight of the ongoing ethnic conflict.

In a joint statement, the organisations said the protest would continue until the government took concrete steps to guarantee safe passage for essential commodities and secure national highways. They also appealed to the authorities to prevent any further obstruction to the supply chain and ensure that relief and emergency services remain unaffected.

The development follows heightened tensions over the movement of vehicles on Manipur’s trunk routes, which serve as the primary lifeline for transporting goods across the state. The blockade is expected to impact logistics and transportation if the deadlock continues.

Security has been tightened along vulnerable stretches of highways, with additional personnel deployed to maintain law and order and facilitate the movement of essential supplies. Officials said the administration is monitoring the situation and is making efforts to prevent further escalation while ensuring that basic commodities continue to reach affected areas.

Manipur has witnessed repeated disruptions to road connectivity since ethnic violence erupted in the state, with competing blockades affecting supply of essential goods and normal life. The latest counter-blockade highlights the continuing challenges facing the administration in restoring stability and maintaining uninterrupted access to critical transport routes.

Continue Reading

India News

Can’t lathicharge a peaceful protest, says Supreme Court

Published

on

By

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the Delhi Police action leading to lathicharges during the student protest at Jantar Mantar on July 20.

The bench of Chief Justice of India Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana observed that a peaceful protest can’t be net with a lathicharge. The court made the remarks while hearing petitions against excessive force used by Delhi Police against students protesting irregularities in the NEET-UG 2026 examination and other public examinations.

The court said the right to peaceful and lawful protest is under the protection of the Constitution. The court observed that the presence of a protest can’t be a ground for police action and said that any allegation of police excess has to be independently examined.

The petitions concern the events of July 20, when thousands of students and supporters of the Cockroach Janta Party tried to march from at Jantar Mantar to Parliament as the Monsoon Session opened. The protesters were demanding action on paper leaks, examination system reforms and government accountability.

Police said they had stopped the march because of security concerns and restrictions in central Delhi. There was a clash later and police used tear gas and lathi charge to disperse the crowd. Over a 100 protesters and a similar number of police were injured in the incident.

The petitioners had sought an independent probe into the police action during the hearing. They also demanded the retention of CCTV footage, body-camera recordings and other electronic evidence, as well as compensation for those injured in the crackdown.

The case comes amid a nationwide debate over reforms of examinations and the handling of student protests. The Centre has brought in legislative measures to strengthen anti-paper leak laws, even as student organizations continue to demand greater accountability.

Continue Reading

India News

Bill against paper leaks eclipsed by Opposition push for Amit Shah reply

Published

on

By

Amit Shah

The Monsoon Session of Parliament witnessed Opposition-Government scenes on Monday as Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh introduced the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha.

The Bill aims to strengthen laws against examination paper leaks and organized cheating following the NEET-UG 2026 controversy.

During the discussions, the Opposition Congress demanded Home Minister Amit Shah’s reply to allegations of police excesses on July 20 during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) march to Parliament. Over 100 students were treated for injuries ranging from fractures to pellet wounds. CRPF personnel have confirmed seven rounds of pellets were fired and five rounds were fired at the students.

Congress leader Pawan Khera said such force should not have been used against the students and the Home Minister must reply to the allegations. Following disruptions, the House was adjourned several times.

The legislation seeks to impose stricter penalties for paper leaks, organized examination fraud, and other unfair practices. It also provides for faster investigations, time-bound trials, and the establishment of a STF to investigate major examination-related offenses. According to the government, the amendments are intended to improve transparency, protect the credibility of public examinations, and restore students’ confidence in the system.

The Congress and several Opposition parties demanded a detailed discussion in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, arguing that the government must be held accountable for both the examination irregularities and the police response.

The debate comes days after the resignation of former Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, following weeks of nationwide protests over paper leaks and examination malpractice. While the Centre has announced reforms and introduced the amendment Bill, Opposition leaders maintain that legislative changes alone are insufficient without fixing responsibility for the controversy and the police action against students.

The government defended its response, stating that it has initiated investigations into examination fraud, introduced stricter legal provisions, and taken steps to strengthen the security of public examinations. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju urged MPs to participate in the debate and allow the House to function smoothly instead of disrupting proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com