English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Fodder scam verdict: Lalu, Jagannath Mishra get 5-year jail term in third case

Published

on

Latest case involves fraudulent withdrawal of Rs. 33.67 crore from Chaibasa treasury against allocation of Rs. 7.10 lakh in 1992-93, Tejashwi cries conspiracy

Weeks after he was sentenced to serve three and a half years in jail in a case linked to the fodder scam, RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav was on Wednesday (January 24) found guilty in the Chaibasa Treasury case – also linked with the overarching fodder scam – and sentenced to five years in prison.

Another former Bihar chief minister, Jagannath Mishra, has also been held guilty of the swindle by the special CBI court in Ranchi and sentenced to a five-year jail term.

With the latest verdict, Lalu now stands convicted in three cases linked to the fodder scam while trial is on in two other cases against him and several other accused, including politicians and bureaucrats.

The RJD chief’s son Tejashwi Yadav has termed the conviction as “political vendetta” and said that an appeal will be filed against both the verdicts – Lalu was sentenced to 3.5 years jail term in the Deoghar Treasury scam on January 6 – in higher courts. Tejashwi added that the BJP, RSS and Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar have conspired against Lalu to ensure his conviction in these cases that had come to light over two decades ago.

On Wednesday morning, the special CBI court of judge SS Prasad had announced a guilty verdict against Lalu, former Bihar Chief Minister Jagannath Mishra and 48 other accused in the Chaibasa treasury case while it acquitted six others. However, unlike previous instances when the courts had declared the accused guilty but set a separate date for pronouncing the quantum of punishment for them, Judge SS Prasad decided to declare the verdict and the sentence within hours of each other.

The latest case pertains to the fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 33.67 crore against an allocation of Rs. 7.10 lakh from the Chaibasa (now in Jharkhand) district treasury in 1992-93. Out of a total of 76 accused, 14 died during the trial, three turned approvers, two pleaded guilty and one is still absconding. Of the 54 who faced the trial, six are politicians, three former IAS officers, six Animal Husbandry Department officials, one treasury official and 40 suppliers to the department.

Earlier this month, Lalu and seven others had been convicted in the Deoghar Treasury case for fraudulent withdrawal of over Rs 89 lakh from the said treasury between 1991 and 1994. Besides the 3.5 years jail terms, each of these convicts had also been slapped with a fine of Rs 5 lakh. The first case linked with the fodder scam in which Lalu was found guilty back in 2013 was also related to fraudulent withdrawals from the Chaibasa treasury. That case had cost Lalu his seat in the Lok Sabha and he was sentenced to five years in jail although he managed to get bail from the Supreme Court after spending a little over two months in prison.

Lalu is currently serving a jail term at Ranchi’s Birsa Munda jail after being convicted in the Deoghar Treasury case. He had declined the special CBI court’s offer of lodging him in an open jail – a system where convicts are allotted independent cottages instead of being locked up in cells within prison premises and have other benefits like relaxed hours for meeting well-wishers, etc.

Two other cases related to the Rs 970 crore fodder scam – those linked to fraudulent withdrawals from the Dumka and Doranda Treasuries – are also in various stages on trial.

Jagannath Mishra who had served as Bihar chief minister for three terms – the last being in 1989-90 before Lalu assumed the office – was convicted in the first Chaibasa Treasury scam along with Lalu but was acquitted in the Deoghar Treasury case. The octogenarian leader, a former Congress heavyweight, had lost his wife Veena on January 22, just two days before the latest guilty verdict.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com