English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Former HAL chief had nailed Def Min Sitharaman’s lie, she must quit: Rahul Gandhi

Published

on

Former HAL chief had nailed Def Min Sitharaman’s lie, she must quit: Rahul Gandhi

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Congress president Rahul Gandhi on Thursday, September 20, attacked defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman, demanding her resignation for ‘lying’ about HAL’s capability to build Rafale aircraft in collaboration with Dassault.

The attack came after the former boss of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited T Suvarna Raju told Hindustan Times (HT) that the state-run plane maker could have built Rafale fighters in India if the government had closed the original negotiations with Dassault and signed a work-share contract with the French company.

“When HAL can build a 25-tonne Sukhoi-30, a fourth-generation fighter jet that forms the mainstay of the air force, from raw material stage, then what are we talking about? We could have definitely done it (licence produced the Rafale jets),” Raju, who retired on September 1, said, according to the HT report.

He questioned why the Union government was not putting out the files in public. “Dassault and HAL had signed the mutual work-share contract and given it to the government. Why don’t you ask the government to put the files out in public? The files will tell you everything,” he said.

He admitted that HAL may not have been able to build the planes at the desired “cost-per-piece”, one of the reasons why that deal fell through, but insisted that the company has the ability to make advanced fighters.

“You have to see the life-cycle costs and not the cost per piece of a fighter. Life-cycle costs would have definitely been cheaper. And ultimately it’s about self reliance. There is a learning curve. If the French are making 100 jets in say 100 hours, I will take 200 hours as I am doing it for the first time. I can’t do it in 80 hours. It’s a scientific process,” he said.

After the HT report, Rahul Gandhi launched a fresh attack on Modi government. Referring to Sitharaman as “RM (Rafale Minister)”, he tweeted to say that former HAL chief, TS Raju, had “nailed” her “lie” and her position had become “untenable”.

“The RM (Rafale Minister) tasked with defending corruption has been caught lying again. The former HAL Chief, T S Raju, has nailed her lie, that HAL didn’t have the capability to build the RAFALE. Her position is untenable & she must resign,” he said.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The Congress has alleged that the government caused loss of over Rs. 41,000 crore to the exchequer and endangered national security by bypassing the state-run HAL in favour of “some businessman friends” for the offset contract in the Rafale deal.

Under India’s offset policy, foreign defence entities are mandated to spend at least 30 per cent of the total contract value in India through procurement of components or setting up of research and development facilities.

On Tuesday, defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman said HAL was “dropped” from the deal when the UPA was in power, because it couldn’t agree on terms of production with Dassault. She told news agency PTI that it was former defence minister AK Antony’s unprecedented intervention that led to the deal being cancelled after the price negotiation committee had almost finalised the deal.

The minister also said that HAL lost out on the chance to build the warplanes because of the UPA regime. She accused Antony of not supporting Hindustan Aeronautics Limited in getting the Rafale deal.

Former defence minister AK Antony denied the charge as false and accused the minister of suppressing facts.

Air Chief Marshal AY Tipnis, a former IAF chief, said building Rafales in India would have been a challenging task for the HAL though not impossible with transfer of manufacturing technology from France. “The fact is HAL has not performed to the level it could have. It promises more than it can deliver and quality of work has been substandard in many cases. It has also backtracked on its promises.”

The NDA government’s decision to enter into a government-to-government deal with France to buy 36 Rafale warplanes was announced in April 2015 with the deal signed a little over a year later. This replaced the UPA regime’s decision to buy 126 Rafale aircraft, 108 of which were to be made in India by HAL using parts imported from France.

The Rafale deal has become controversial with the opposition, led by the Congress, claiming that the price at which India is buying Rafale aircraft now is Rs 1,670 crore for each, three times the Rs 526 crore, the initial bid by the company when the UPA was trying to buy the aircraft. It has also claimed the previous deal included a technology transfer agreement with HAL.

The deal has also become controversial on account of the fact that one of the offset deals signed by Dassault is with the Reliance Group of Anil Ambani. The Congress claims the earlier deal was scrapped and a new one signed just to provide Ambani this opportunity for an offset deal. Both the government and Reliance have repeatedly denied this.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

LPU violence: Masks, iron rods and fire turn student protest violent

Violence erupted at Lovely Professional University in Punjab after an unverified social media claim about the alleged rape and suicide of a female student. Police registered an FIR and began investigating the incident.

Published

on

A protest at Lovely Professional University (LPU) in Punjab’s Phagwara escalated into violence after an unverified social media claim alleged that a female student had been raped and later died by suicide.

The allegation had not been confirmed by police when the protest began. LPU rejected the claim and described it as false and fabricated. The unrest later involved vandalism, fires and a blockade of National Highway-44 outside the university.

By Monday, September 28, security had been tightened around the campus, classes had been suspended for 10 days and students were leaving the university as parents arrived to take them home.

How the LPU protest began

The protest reportedly began near Girls’ Hostel-3 around 1 am on Sunday.

According to a student interviewed by media, students had received a message on Reddit claiming that a girl had been raped and subsequently died by suicide. The student said more people joined the protest after messages circulated among students.

However, police had not received or confirmed a rape complaint when the protest started. The allegation therefore remained unverified.

As more students gathered, the situation deteriorated.

Masks and iron rods seen during the unrest

Videos from the campus showed large numbers of people, with several individuals wearing masks.

Students interviewed after the violence said they were unable to establish whether everyone involved was a student or whether some people had entered the campus from outside.

One student also alleged that some people involved in the violence were carrying iron rods. These are accounts provided by students and should not be treated as an independently established identification of those responsible.

Police have been examining CCTV footage and investigating whether people from outside the university were involved.

Campus property damaged, fires reported

The unrest resulted in damage to university property, including smashed window panes and other vandalism. Some objects were also set on fire.

The violence extended beyond the campus, with protesters blocking National Highway-44, a major route connecting Jalandhar and Phagwara. The blockade continued for more than 15 hours before traffic was restored on Monday.

Other reporting also said vehicles and parts of buildings were damaged during the unrest.

Police registered FIR, special team formed

Punjab authorities moved to investigate the violence after the situation escalated.

Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann directed police authorities to take strict action against those responsible for the vandalism and arson. Punjab DGP Gaurav Yadav also visited the campus and reviewed the situation.

Police registered an FIR and formed a high-level Special Investigation Team to investigate the incident.

DGP Gaurav Yadav said the police had initially exercised restraint because students were involved in the protest. He said the authorities attempted to address students’ grievances through discussions.

What LPU said about the rape allegation

Lovely Professional University has denied that a female student was raped on the campus.

LPU Registrar Monica Gulati described the allegations as false, baseless and fabricated. The university also released a video featuring three female students from room 504 of a hostel, in which they said that no such incident had taken place in their room.

The video subsequently became controversial when the same students appeared in another video and alleged that they had been told what to say and that the video had been used without their consent.

These claims surrounding the video were circulating allegations and had not themselves been independently established in the report.

LPU classes suspended for 10 days

Following the violence, the university suspended classes for 10 days from September 28.

The university also postponed mid-term examinations until further notice, according to reporting on the situation.

Security was increased on the campus as students began leaving with their belongings and parents arrived to take them home.

What is known about the alleged rape-suicide claim?

At the time of the protests, police had not confirmed a rape complaint at LPU. The allegation had circulated through social media and among students but remained unverified.

LPU denied that the alleged incident had occurred. Police are investigating the violence and the circumstances surrounding the claims.

Continue Reading

India News

Supreme Court gives ECI four months to decide TMC name, symbol dispute

The Supreme Court has directed the Election Commission of India to decide the dispute over the All India Trinamool Congress name and ‘Flowers & Grass’ symbol within three months after completion of pleadings.

Published

on

The Supreme Court has directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to decide the dispute over the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) name and its ‘Flowers & Grass’ election symbol within a defined timeline.

The order came while the court was hearing a plea filed by Mamata Banerjee challenging the Election Commission’s interim decision to freeze the use of the party’s original name and reserved symbol amid competing claims between rival factions.

The court has given the parties four weeks to complete their pleadings, including responses, affidavits and counter-affidavits. The ECI will then have three months to adjudicate the dispute. This effectively establishes a four-month timeline for completion of the process.

What did the Supreme Court direct?

The Supreme Court directed the contesting sides to place their responses and other documents on record within four weeks.

After the pleadings are completed, the Election Commission has been asked to take three months to decide the dispute concerning the party’s name and election symbol. The matter is being considered under Paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.

The Supreme Court’s directions therefore provide a structured timeline for the ECI’s adjudication of the competing claims.

Why is the TMC name and symbol dispute before the Supreme Court?

The case follows an interim decision by the Election Commission in September to prevent the rival factions from using the All India Trinamool Congress name and the reserved ‘Flowers & Grass’ symbol while the competing claims are examined.

The Commission had said the dispute required a substantive determination under Paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.

Mamata Banerjee subsequently approached the Supreme Court challenging the ECI’s interim arrangement. The Supreme Court is examining the challenge while the substantive dispute remains before the poll panel.

What names and symbols are being used temporarily?

Following the Election Commission’s interim decision, the two rival factions were allotted separate identities for the upcoming by-elections.

The faction led by Mamata Banerjee was allotted the name Mamata All India Trinamool Congress and the Football Player symbol. The rival faction was allotted the name Democratic Trinamool Congress and the Envelope symbol.

These are interim arrangements and do not amount to a final determination of which faction is entitled to the original AITC name and ‘Flowers & Grass’ symbol.

What happens next in the TMC symbol dispute?

The immediate next step is for the rival sides to complete their pleadings within four weeks.

Once that stage is completed, the ECI has three months to decide the dispute. The Supreme Court has thus effectively provided a four-month framework for the proceedings to reach a decision.

Continue Reading

India News

Weather Tomorrow: Rain to ease in North India, heavy showers expected in South

The IMD has forecast easing rainfall across much of north India on September 29, while heavy to very heavy rain is expected in parts of southern India and showers will continue in the Northeast.

Published

on

Rain 2026

Rainfall activity across much of north India is expected to ease on Tuesday, September 29, while parts of southern India and the Northeast are likely to continue experiencing active weather.

The India Meteorological Department (IMD), in its latest forecast on Monday evening, predicted heavy to very heavy rainfall in parts of southern India, along with continued showers in the Northeast and Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

North India to see improving weather

Uttarakhand is expected to see a significant improvement in weather conditions on Tuesday. The IMD has not issued a heavy rain warning for the state.

Light to moderate rain is, however, likely at a few places in Uttarkashi, Rudraprayag, Chamoli, Bageshwar and Pithoragarh districts.

Himachal Pradesh may receive isolated rainfall, while Delhi, Haryana and Punjab are expected to remain largely dry.

The southwest monsoon’s withdrawal has reached Chandigarh, with the IMD expecting dry conditions across Delhi-NCR, Haryana and Punjab from September 29.

Uttar Pradesh is also likely to experience a gradual reduction in rainfall activity. The IMD has issued no warning for either eastern or western Uttar Pradesh for Tuesday, following several days of heavy rain that caused flooding and waterlogging in several districts.

Heavy rain forecast in parts of South India

South Interior Karnataka is likely to be the main focus in southern India on September 29, with the IMD forecasting very heavy rainfall along with thunderstorms and lightning.

Heavy rainfall activity in the region may continue through October 1.

Tamil Nadu, Puducherry and Karaikal are also expected to receive heavy rainfall from September 29, with the activity likely to continue through October 1.

Parts of Maharashtra could also experience storm activity. Madhya Maharashtra may see thunderstorms and lightning, while Konkan and Goa could also experience similar conditions.

Northeast likely to receive heavy rain

In the Northeast, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Tripura are expected to receive heavy rainfall accompanied by thunderstorms and lightning on September 29.

The IMD has forecast further heavy rainfall activity across the region on September 30.

The Andaman and Nicobar Islands are also likely to experience thunderstorms and lightning on Tuesday.

The IMD is monitoring a depression over the north Andaman Sea and adjoining Myanmar coast. According to the forecast, the system is expected to move towards the northeast Bay of Bengal and the Bangladesh coast.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com