English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Beating the model code of conduct: Candidates can’t give cash but governments can

There has been a flood of offers and sops from both parties, ironically started by the BJP which has been at the forefront of a campaign to eliminate freebies

Published

on

Shivraj Singh Chouhan

By Neeraj Mishra

Diwali has slowed down the race in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh while people celebrate and reflect on the booty on offer in the two states. There has been a flood of offers and sops from both parties, ironically started by the BJP, which has been at the forefront of a campaign to eliminate what it calls “freebies” and their impact on the economy. A lawyer associated with the party has even filed a PIL in the Supreme Court calling for an end to freebies offered by parties ahead of elections.

Sops should first be cleared by a board consisting of Income Tax payers. But in the current elections, it is not the free promises but the misuse of state apparatus that is making waves. After 17 years in the saddle, Shivraj Singh Chouhan suddenly woke up to the power of the word “free” and made it state policy. Just before the election dates were announced, he offered Rs 3,000 per month to all “pyari behenas”.

Two instalments have been delivered, one on Rakhi and the other on Karva Chauth. Similarly in Chhattisgarh, Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel has offered Rs 2,500 per month to all unemployed youth below the age of 35. Three instalments have been delivered. If this is not enticement, what is? But it is not covered under the Model Code of Conduct as defined by the Election Commission of India.

Candidates can’t give cash but governments can. There is more, Chouhan has offered Rs 500 subsidy on gas to every “vivahit mahila”. So have Baghel and his Rajasthan counterpart Ashok Gehlot. Chouhan has another Seekho Kamao Scheme 2023 where all unemployed youth are being given Rs 10,000 so that they can learn some skill and start their own business.

This, of course, includes learning how to make tea and pakoras. All state governments going to elections have launched their own Mukhmantri Awas Yojana on the lines of the PM Awas Yojana. The above are instances of direct cash transfer by the state and the ruling party which gives it an obvious edge. So where is the level playing field for all candidates?

To level the field, opposition parties in both states have adopted the more the merrier promises. If the Congress in Chhattisgarh wanted to give Rs 2,800 per quintal of rice, the BJP immediately promised Rs 3,100 forcing the Congress to revise its offer to Rs 3,200. So the BJP decided to offer Rs 12,000 to every woman in the state per year. For this, it has started a fill-the-form campaign. All women who filled a BJP form declaring that they want the Rs 12,000 will be given Rs 12,000 if the party comes to power. So again this is a model contravention of the model code of conduct.

There is no cash given now but it will be given definitely. Modi ki Guarantee hai. Congress got smart and upped it to Rs 15,000 per year. So now just calculate the cash dole out. Every married woman will get Rs 3000 per month in MP. So if a family has only two women, the mother-in-law and the daughter-in-law, then the household gets Rs 72,000 per year. Add to it LPG cylinder for Rs 500 and Rs 1 per kg rice, so where is the need to work? Of course, the government will also give Rs 10 lakh health insurance cover and a PM or CM Awas.

There are other free ideas to avail of, from school dress to cycle and sewing machine to pakora stalls. In Chhattisgarh, each farmer will get Rs 1,000 above the MSP per quintal. It’s far above what the rest of the country gets. If there are two unemployed sons because farming is not employment, then each gets Rs 24,000 per year. The wife and daughter get Rs 12,000 or Rs 15,000 per year. Of course, the same gas, housing and health schemes apply here apart from free rice, dal and chana. Are we trying to bring up a generation which does not need to work? Is it only moot to ask this or wait for the Supreme Court to deliver its verdict?

Bihar news

Mokama shootout case: Former Bihar MLA Anant Singh surrenders, sent to jail

Singh’s supporters retaliated to the initial attack, leading to the intense exchange of gunfire that gripped the area. The incident underscores the deep-seated power struggles and lawlessness that persist in certain parts of Bihar.

Published

on

Former Bihar MLA Anant Singh surrendered to a Barh court on Friday, facing charges related to a shootout on the outskirts of Patna. The incident, which occurred Wednesday evening, involved an alleged attack on Singh’s convoy by the notorious Sonu-Monu gang. The ensuing exchange of gunfire, according to eyewitness accounts, involved a significant volume of shots – estimates ranging from 60 to 70 rounds, though police reported a lower figure of 16-17.

Remarkably, Singh escaped unharmed. Following his surrender, he was remanded to Beur jail. Patna Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Awkash Kumar confirmed the surrender and the filing of three separate FIRs concerning the incident.

The shootout unfolded amidst a backdrop of escalating tensions in Mokama, a region with a history of violent crime and political rivalry. The involvement of the Sonu-Monu gang, known for its criminal activities, added a layer of complexity to the already volatile situation.

Singh’s supporters retaliated to the initial attack, leading to the intense exchange of gunfire that gripped the area. The incident underscores the deep-seated power struggles and lawlessness that persist in certain parts of Bihar.

Adding to the escalating tension, another shooting incident was reported on Friday in Hamza village, under the jurisdiction of Panchmahal police station in Mokama. Three spent cartridges were found near Mukesh Singh’s house, prompting an immediate investigation.

Senior police officials were deployed to the scene to assess the situation and gather evidence. The timing and location of this second incident suggest a possible connection to the previous day’s events, raising concerns about further escalation of violence.

Police have apprehended two suspects, Sonu and Roushan, in connection with Wednesday’s shooting. Investigations suggest that the Sonu-Monu gang specifically targeted Mukesh Singh, a former associate of the gang who had allegedly sought protection and assistance from Anant Singh. This suggests a complex network of allegiances and betrayals within the criminal underworld of Mokama.

Anant Singh, a controversial figure with a history of both political success and criminal accusations, has been a prominent figure in Mokama’s political landscape for years. His past includes a conviction in 2020 related to the recovery of an AK-47 rifle and other weapons from his ancestral home, resulting in his disqualification from the assembly.

However, he was acquitted of these charges in August 2024. His wife, a former MLA, recently shifted her political allegiance from the RJD to Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s JD(U), further complicating the political dynamics of the region.

Continue Reading

Bollywood news

FIR filed against Shreyas Talpade, Alok Nath, 11 others in cheating case in Haryana

The case has sent ripples through the Bollywood industry, casting a shadow over the careers of both actors. While the details of their alleged involvement remain under investigation, the allegations raise serious questions about their conduct and potential complicity in a scheme that defrauded numerous investors.

Published

on

Bollywood actors Shreyas Talpade and Alok Nath find themselves embroiled in a significant legal controversy, named as accused in a cheating and breach of trust case registered at the Murthal police station in Sonipat, Haryana.

The First Information Report (FIR), filed on January 22, lists the two prominent actors among thirteen individuals charged under Sections 316 (2), 318 (2), and 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. These charges encompass criminal breach of trust, cheating, and the fraudulent transfer of property.

The complainant, Sonipat resident Vipul Antil, levelled accusations against the Human Welfare Credit Cooperative Society, registered in Indore under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act of 2002. Antil alleges that the society, active across multiple states, including Haryana, since September 16th, 2016, lured investors with promises of exorbitant returns on fixed deposits (FDs) and recurring deposits (RDs).

The society employed a multi-level marketing strategy, incentivizing agents to recruit additional investors, creating a pyramid scheme structure that ultimately led to widespread financial losses.

Ajeet Singh, the Additional Commissioner of Police (ACP) in Murthal, confirmed the inclusion of Talpade and Nath’s names in the list of accused, based on statements provided by the complainant. Singh clarified that the primary focus of the investigation remains the alleged fraudulent activities of the cooperative society, and the police are currently working to determine the specific roles, if any, played by Talpade and Nath in the alleged scheme. The investigation will delve into the extent of their involvement and whether they directly benefited from the alleged fraudulent activities.

The case has sent ripples through the Bollywood industry, casting a shadow over the careers of both actors. While the details of their alleged involvement remain under investigation, the allegations raise serious questions about their conduct and potential complicity in a scheme that defrauded numerous investors.

Shreyas Talpade’s most recent cinematic appearance was in Kangana Ranaut’s directorial debut, Emergency, a historical drama set during India’s tumultuous Emergency period from 1975 to 1977. Alok Nath, a veteran Bollywood actor, boasts a prolific career spanning over three decades and encompassing over 300 films, establishing him as a familiar face in Indian cinema. The unfolding investigation will determine the extent of their involvement in this complex financial crime and the consequences they may face.

Continue Reading

India News

BPSC results out: Aspirants react as controversy, protests over paper leak persist

Published

on

BPSC aspirants ask Prashant Kishore to step back from protest site, political strategist-turned-politician responds

The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) declared the results for the 70th Combined Competitive Exam (CCE) on January 23, 2025. In the hours following the announcement, reactions to the results and the subsequent developments have continued to unfold, with protests, legal challenges, and debates surrounding the exam process showing no sign of abating.

21,581 candidates clear, but tension persists

While 21,581 candidates cleared the preliminary exam, questions remain about the legitimacy of the results. Legal challenges have already been initiated, with petitions filed in the Patna High Court questioning the integrity of the examination process, particularly regarding the status of those who were debarred due to alleged malpractice. The court’s involvement could still alter the final list of successful candidates.

Political impact and ongoing reactions

The protests have also drawn political figures into the fray. Prashant Kishor, leader of the Jan Suraj Party, joined the demonstrations and went on an indefinite hunger strike starting January 2, showing solidarity with the aspirants. His involvement and calls for action have added a political dimension to the controversy, which is now under the scrutiny of Bihar’s government.

Bihar Governor Arif Mohammad Khan recently met with a delegation of aspirants to hear their grievances and assured them that steps would be taken to address their concerns. The Governor also appealed to Prashant Kishor to end his fast, citing health concerns.

Looking ahead: What’s next for the 21,581 pass candidates?

For the candidates who have successfully passed the prelims, the main examination is the next step. However, the future of the recruitment process remains uncertain, with protests, petitions, and public calls for reforms still ongoing. The uncertainty surrounding the exam’s integrity and the lack of clarity on future steps means that the exam’s aftermath will likely continue to dominate discussions.

As the BPSC navigates the fallout from this highly contentious exam, it faces increasing pressure to restore public trust and ensure that future recruitment processes are conducted with the highest standards of fairness and transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com