English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Genetically modified food products being sold illegally in India: CSE

Published

on

Genetically modified food products being sold illegally in India: CSE

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]New Delhi-based research and advocacy body Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has exposed large-scale illegal presence and sale of genetically modified (GM) processed foods in the country in a first study of its kind for India.

Production, sale and import of these foods is banned in the country without the approval of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), the CSE pointed out.

The CSE study, conducted by its Pollution Monitoring Laboratory (PML), found 32 per cent of the tested 65 food products that are available in Indian markets to be GM-positive.

These food products were purchased randomly from retail outlets in Delhi-NCR, Punjab and Gujarat. Both imported (35) and domestically produced (30) samples were tested. “The imported samples fared worse: 80 per cent of the products which were found to be GM-positive, were imported,” said CSE.

Infant food, edible oil and packaged food snacks were among the products which were found to be GM-positive. Most of these are imported from the US, Canada, the Netherlands, Thailand, and the UAE. These products were produced from or contain soya, cotton seed, corn or rapeseed (canola), which are known GM crops of the world.

Releasing the results of the study, CSE director general SunitaNarain said: “Our government says it has not allowed the import of GM food products. Then how is this happening? We have found that laws are not the problem – the regulatory agencies are.”

She said in tweet: #illegalGMinourfood @fssaiindia is responsible for ensuring that there is no GM food in India. Minister told parliament no approval for GM food given. Then how have we found in 80% of imported food tested?[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Chandra Bhushan, deputy director general, CSE, said: “We had been hearing about the presence of illegal GM food in India, and decided to do a reality check by testing processed foods. We were shocked to know the scale in which GM foodshave penetrated the Indian market. The regulatory authorities are to blame here – the FSSAIhas not allowed any GM food on paper,but has failed to curb its illegal sales.”

“GM – genetically modified – products, especially food, raise a crucial question of safety: a question of how safe are they. The jury is still out on this,” says Narain.

This is because GM food involves taking genes (DNA) from different organisms and inserting them in food crops. There is a concern that this ‘foreign’ DNA can lead to risks such as toxicity, allergic reactions, and nutritional and unintended impacts.

Most countries in the world, including India, have decided to take a ‘precautionary’ approach to GM food. They have set stringent regulations for approval and labelling. The EU, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil and South Korea have made it mandatory to label GM food so that consumers have a choice about what they are eating.

Narain tweeted: #illegalGMinourfood CSE study shows #Abbott Healthcare selling #infant food with GM in India. In #US after pressure selling produce GM-free. But not here. Why? Indian lives don’t matter?[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRSUzQ2ElMjBocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRmhhc2h0YWclMkZpbGxlZ2FsR01pbm91cmZvb2QlM0ZzcmMlM0RoYXNoJTI2YW1wJTNCcmVmX3NyYyUzRHR3c3JjJTI1NUV0ZnclMjIlM0UlMjNpbGxlZ2FsR01pbm91cmZvb2QlM0MlMkZhJTNFJTIwQ1NFJTIwc3R1ZHklMjBzaG93cyUyMCUzQ2ElMjBocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRmhhc2h0YWclMkZBYmJvdHQlM0ZzcmMlM0RoYXNoJTI2YW1wJTNCcmVmX3NyYyUzRHR3c3JjJTI1NUV0ZnclMjIlM0UlMjNBYmJvdHQlM0MlMkZhJTNFJTIwSGVhbHRoY2FyZSUyMHNlbGxpbmclMjAlM0NhJTIwaHJlZiUzRCUyMmh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGdHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZoYXNodGFnJTJGaW5mYW50JTNGc3JjJTNEaGFzaCUyNmFtcCUzQnJlZl9zcmMlM0R0d3NyYyUyNTVFdGZ3JTIyJTNFJTIzaW5mYW50JTNDJTJGYSUzRSUyMGZvb2QlMjB3aXRoJTIwR00lMjBpbiUyMEluZGlhLiUyMEluJTIwJTNDYSUyMGhyZWYlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGaGFzaHRhZyUyRlVTJTNGc3JjJTNEaGFzaCUyNmFtcCUzQnJlZl9zcmMlM0R0d3NyYyUyNTVFdGZ3JTIyJTNFJTIzVVMlM0MlMkZhJTNFJTIwYWZ0ZXIlMjBwcmVzc3VyZSUyMHNlbGxpbmclMjBwcm9kdWNlJTIwR00tZnJlZS4lMjBCdXQlMjBub3QlMjBoZXJlLiUyMFdoeSUzRiUyMEluZGlhbiUyMGxpdmVzJTIwZG9uJTI2JTIzMzklM0J0JTIwbWF0dGVyJTNGJTNDJTJGcCUzRSUyNm1kYXNoJTNCJTIwU3VuaXRhJTIwTmFyYWluJTIwJTI4JTQwc3VuaXRhbmFyJTI5JTIwJTNDYSUyMGhyZWYlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGc3VuaXRhbmFyJTJGc3RhdHVzJTJGMTAyMjQxMzY4NzcyOTA4MjM2OCUzRnJlZl9zcmMlM0R0d3NyYyUyNTVFdGZ3JTIyJTNFSnVseSUyMDI2JTJDJTIwMjAxOCUzQyUyRmElM0UlM0MlMkZibG9ja3F1b3RlJTNFJTBBJTNDc2NyaXB0JTIwYXN5bmMlMjBzcmMlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnBsYXRmb3JtLnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGd2lkZ2V0cy5qcyUyMiUyMGNoYXJzZXQlM0QlMjJ1dGYtOCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRnNjcmlwdCUzRSUwQQ==[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]CSE findings:

GM food contains foreign promoter and terminator genes. More than 90 per cent of GM crops in the market contain promoter genes like 35S promoter of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) and FMV promoter of figwort mosaic virus, and NOS terminator of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Using quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), CSE’s lab screened the food products to ascertain if they had a combination 35S promoter, NOS terminator and FMV promoter.

The key findings of the study are:

– 32 per cent (21 out of 65) of the food product samples tested were GM-positive.

– About 80 per cent (16 out of 21) of those which tested positive were imported. These were made of or used soy, corn and rapeseed and were imported from Canada, the Netherlands, Thailand, the UAE, and the US.

– 56 per cent (9/16) of oil samples, 25 per cent (10/39) of packaged food samples and 25 per cent (2/8) of infant food samples were GM-positive.

All five samples of cottonseed oil from India tested positive. This is because BT-cotton is the single GM crop that has been allowed for cultivation in the country.

This should worry us. Said Bhushan. “Firstly, no permission has been given for the use of GM cottonseed oil for human consumption. Secondly, cottonseed oil is also mixed in other edible oils, particularly vanaspati, which means we are consuming it without knowing,” he said.

– GM contamination was found in infant food, sold for children with medical ailments, including allergies. Two products by Abbott Laboratories, the American healthcare company, were found to be GM-positive – one was for lactose-intolerant infants and the other was a hypoallergenic (for minimizing the possibility of an allergic reaction). Neither product has any label warning parents that this food has GM ingredients.

– Other than edible oil, no processed food sample manufactured in India was found GM-positive.

– There was no mention of GM in the labels of 65 per cent (13/20) GM-positive samples labels. These include:  Canola oil brands (‘Farrell’ imported from UAE by Jindal Retails (India) Pvt Ltd; ‘Hudson’ from UAE, marketed by Dalmia Continental Pvt Ltd; ‘Jivo’ imported from Canada by Jivo Wellness Pvt Ltd);and cottonseed oil brands from India (‘Ankur’, ‘Ginni’, ‘Tirupati’ and ‘Vimal’).

Packaged foods like ‘Pancake syrup original’ and ‘Popcorn Hot N’ Spicy’ – both products of American Garden – imported in India by Bajoria Foods Pvt Ltd; ‘FrootLoops’ – a sweetened multigrain cereal from Kellogg’s imported by Newage Gourmet Foods; and ‘Crispy corn snacks’ from Bugles – distributed by General Mills Inc, USA and imported by Newage Gourmet Foods.

– Three products made false claims suggesting that no GM ingredient is used. These were ‘Candrop’ Canola oil from Canadaimported by Century Edible Cooking Oils Pvt Ltd; ‘Mori-nu silken tofu’ from the US, imported by Olive Tree Trading Pvt Ltd; and ‘PromPlus sweet whole kernel corn’ from Thailandimported by Guru KirpaImpex.

– Four products that carried labels of genetic engineering technology were ‘Butter and Garlic Croutons’ from MrsCubbison’s; ‘Corn puffs’ by Trix – distributed by General Mills Sales Inc, USA; ‘Original syrup’ from Aunt Jemima – distributed by Quaker Oats in the US; and ‘Dark corn syrup’ from Karo, US. All four products were imported by Newage Gourmet Foods.

Says Narain: “In 2008 (updated in 2012), the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) had issued guidelines for determining safety of such food — it cautioned that ‘there is a possibility of introducing unintended changes, along with intended changes, which may in turn have an impact on the nutritional status or health of the consumer.’ Keeping this in mind, India should adopt a health-based precautionary principle approach to GM food regulation and labelling.”

The FSSAI has now issued a draft notification on labelling, which includes GM food. Says Amit Khurana, programme director, food safety and toxins, CSE: “The FSSAI notification says that any food that has 5 per cent or more GM ingredients, shall be labelled, provided this GM ingredient constitutes the top three ingredients in terms of percentage in the product. The exemption limit of 5 per cent is very relaxed compared to other countries such as the EU, Australia and Brazil, which have limits at or below 1 per cent.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Sonam Wangchuk shifted to Medanta after Delhi High Court order

Activist Sonam Wangchuk was transferred from Safdarjung Hospital to Medanta Hospital in Gurugram after the Delhi High Court directed his immediate shift and ordered continuous medical supervision.

Published

on

Activist Sonam Wangchuk was shifted from Safdarjung Hospital in Delhi to Medanta Hospital in Gurugram on Tuesday evening after the Delhi High Court directed his immediate transfer for further treatment.

Hospital authorities said Wangchuk was discharged from VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital at 6:40 pm and handed over to a medical team from Medanta in compliance with the court’s order issued on July 21.

Court orders transfer and continuous monitoring

A bench comprising Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia directed that Wangchuk be shifted to Medanta Hospital without delay.

The court also instructed the hospital’s director to constitute a team of doctors with the required expertise to continuously monitor his health. It said the medical team should administer treatment in accordance with accepted medical protocols, which Wangchuk must follow.

The order came on an appeal filed by Wangchuk’s wife, Gitanjali Angmo, challenging an earlier High Court decision that had declined to interfere with his treatment at Safdarjung Hospital or permit his transfer to Medanta.

Medical condition stable at discharge

According to Safdarjung Hospital, Wangchuk’s vital parameters were stable at the time of discharge.

However, doctors said pancytopenia continued to persist and his serum potassium level was recorded at 3.4 mEq/L.

The hospital added that all medical records, investigation reports and treatment documents were handed over to the Medanta medical team to ensure continuity of care.

Court cites constitutional rights

In its order, the Delhi High Court observed that Wangchuk should be allowed to receive treatment at a hospital of his choice, saying such a decision was protected under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

Wangchuk has been on an indefinite fast since June 28 over alleged examination irregularities.

Continue Reading

India News

Union Minister Jitendra Singh says Rahul Gandhi changed demands after Centre agreed to Parliament discussion

Union Minister Jitendra Singh claimed Rahul Gandhi changed his demands during talks at the Congress protest after the Centre agreed to a Parliament discussion on the NEET and paper leak issues.

Published

on

Union Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office Jitendra Singh has alleged that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi changed his demands during talks held at the party’s protest outside Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s residence on Tuesday.

According to Singh, the government had agreed to Congress’ request for a discussion in Parliament on the NEET examination and other alleged paper leak issues. However, he claimed Rahul Gandhi later insisted that Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan should also resign.

Jitendra Singh recounts conversation with Rahul Gandhi

In a post on X, Jitendra Singh said he, along with Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan, met Congress leaders after being sent by the government as the protest was led by senior leaders including Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi.

The minister claimed Rahul Gandhi initially told him the protest would be withdrawn if the government agreed to hold a discussion in Parliament on the NEET issue, other examination paper leaks and the protests related to them.

Singh said he obtained approval from the government’s top leadership and informed Rahul Gandhi that the Centre was ready to discuss all issues related to NEET and the associated movement in Parliament.

Minister alleges demands were later changed

Jitendra Singh alleged that after being informed of the government’s decision, Rahul Gandhi introduced an additional demand.

According to the minister, Rahul Gandhi then sought an assurance that Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan would resign. Singh claimed the Congress leader stated that his demands now included both a parliamentary discussion and the education minister’s resignation.

The minister further alleged that when reminded that his original demand had only been for a discussion in Parliament, Rahul Gandhi responded that his demands had changed.

‘It is my prerogative,’ says minister

Jitendra Singh also claimed that when he urged Rahul Gandhi not to alter his position so quickly, the Congress leader replied that it was “his prerogative.”

The minister further said Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan informed Rahul Gandhi that the location was not appropriate for a sit-in protest. According to Singh, Rahul Gandhi responded that it was “his prerogative to sit wherever he wants.”

Congress MPs had earlier said the discussions between the two sides remained inconclusive and that the party’s demands had not been met.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav removed during protest outside PM Modi’s residence

Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge and Priyanka Gandhi led a protest outside PM Modi’s residence over the NEET paper leak issue before police removed several Opposition leaders.

Published

on

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Priyanka Gandhi led a protest march to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s residence in New Delhi on Tuesday over the NEET paper leak issue and alleged police action against protesters. Later in the evening, Delhi Police removed Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and other leaders from the protest site.

Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, remained seated on the road while refusing to leave before police personnel escorted him to a bus and removed him from the area.

Before the protest ended, Rahul Gandhi appealed to people to join the demonstration, saying that an attack on students was an attack on every Indian family and demanding justice for students.

Congress sticks to demands

The protest began after Congress leaders gathered outside the residence of Mallikarjun Kharge and marched towards the Prime Minister’s residence. During the protest, Union Minister Jitendra Singh met Rahul Gandhi and held discussions with him.

According to Congress leaders, the talks remained inconclusive as the party insisted on two key demands—a discussion in Parliament on the paper leak issue and the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

However, Jitendra Singh later claimed Rahul Gandhi had initially agreed to end the protest if Parliament discussed the issue but later added the minister’s resignation as another condition.

Police removed the protesters shortly after the minister’s statement.

Protest follows CJP march

The Congress demonstration came a day after the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led march to Parliament over alleged irregularities in NEET and other examinations. The CJP claimed several protesters were injured during police action.

Delhi Police, however, alleged that protesters turned violent, attacked personnel, damaged police vehicles and threw stones. The force said 118 police personnel were injured during Monday’s violence.

During Tuesday’s protest, Congress leaders accused the government of avoiding accountability and alleged that the Opposition was not allowed to raise the issue in Parliament. Kharge questioned why the Opposition was prevented from discussing the alleged assault on students.

Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav and NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) leader Supriya Sule also joined the protest.

Meanwhile, the government maintained that it was ready to discuss the concerns of protesters but would not tolerate violence. Prime Minister Narendra Modi also said preventing examination paper leaks was a national responsibility and stressed that strict action had been taken after reports of the NEET paper leak emerged.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com