English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Opposition hits out at Centre over Hindenburg report on Adani Group

US-based Hindenburg Research’s new report which claimed that the SEBI chief Madhabi Buch herself was involved in the case as she had stakes in the company.

Published

on

The Opposition parties on Sunday hit out at Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Central government over US-based Hindenburg Research’s new report which claimed that the SEBI chief Madhabi Buch herself was involved in the case as she had stakes in the company.

In a post on X, Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said that SEBI’s strange reluctance to investigate the “Adani MegaScam” had been noted for a long time. He also demanded a probe by a Joint Parliamentary Committee.

SEBI’s strange reluctance to investigate the Adani MegaScam has been long noted, not least by the Supreme Court’s Expert Committee, he said. Adding that Committee had pointed out in its report that SEBI had in 2018 diluted and, in 2019, entirely deleted the reporting requirements relating to the ultimate beneficial (i.e. actual) ownership of foreign funds.

In his statement, he added that this had tied its hands to the extent that ‘the securities market regulator suspects wrongdoing, but also finds compliance with various stipulations in attendant regulations. He further said citing experts that it is this dichotomy that has led to SEBI drawing a blank worldwide.

Hindenburg Research’s latest allegation raises fresh questions about Gautam Adani’s two 2022 meetings in quick succession with Buch shortly after she was appointed as SEBI chairperson, the Congress leader said in a statement.

Earlier, in another post, Ramesh used the Latin phrase ‘Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes’ (Who will guard the guards themselves) to take a swipe at Madhabi Buch.

Meanwhile, Congress MP Manish Tewari said that a JPC must be constituted to go into the entire Hindenburg saga.

Speaking on the matter, he said that there has been certain revelations by the Hindenburg Research which have been put out in the public space.

The Congress leader said that they require closer scrutiny, underlining that, there seems to be some semblance of an alleged conflict of interest and so therefore under those circumstances there has been a demand in the public space for a while that the entire Hindenburg saga needs to be investigated properly by a joint parliamentary committee is constituted to go into all these issues at length.

The Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra also took a dig over the allegations, saying that in true Adani style, even the SEBI chairman is an investor in his group.“Crony Capitalism at its finest,” she said in a post on X.

Moitra also demanded that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigate alleged money laundering.

The AAP leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, taking to X,  wrote, “The Hindenburg revelations were hinted at 3 days before Modi ended the Parliament session. Modi Government is steeped in corruption from head to toe. To save his friend Adani, Modi Ji got the investigation done by the same SEBI Chairman who had committed the scam in connivance with Adani. SC should reconsider its decision.”

The Samajwadi Party leader Ghanshyam Tiwari also lashed out at the Central government and said that the tenure of PM Modi will be known for ‘Adani-waad’.

He said the whole world witnessed a different session with different ideologies but the term of PM Modi will be known as ‘Adani-waad’. In this Adani-waad, he said, they captured the whole economic system of India in such a way that Gautam Ad could benefit, it looks like this is the only motive of Prime Minister Modi.

The US short-seller Hindenburg Research released its reports on August 10 alleging market watchdog SEBI chairperson Madhabi Buch and her husband Dhaval Buch were involved in Adani Group’s offshore funds. The report further suggested that these obscure financial systems were allegedly used in the money-siphoning scandal.

However, at the centre of the storm, the SEBI chairperson and her husband issued a joint statement denying all charges. They said that it was an attempt of “character assassination.

According to the Hindenbur report, Madhabi Buch and her husband Dhaval Buch first appear to have opened their account with IPE Plus Fund 1 on June 5th, 2015 in Singapore, per whistleblower documents.

A declaration of funds, signed by a principal at IIFL states that the source of the investment is “salary” and the couple´s net worth is estimated at $10 million. 

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com