English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

India angry over Palestinian Ambassador sharing dais with Hafiz Saeed

Published

on

India angry over Palestinian Ambassador sharing dais with Hafiz Saeed

New Delhi refuse to issue visa to Pakistani devotees of Hazrat Nizamuddin

Amidst facing criticism within Bhartiya Janata Party on its vote at United Nations Security Council in favor of the resolution denouncing Washington’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israeli capital, government of India has now expressed anger over Palestinian Ambassador sharing stage with Hafiz Saeed, the main accused in 26/11 Mumbai terror attack in Rawalpindi.

Raveesh Kumar, spokesperson of Ministry of External Affairs, in a statement on Friday, said, “We are taking up the matter strongly with the Palestinian ambassador in New Delhi and with the Palestinian authorities.”

Pictures of Palestinian ambassador Walid Abu Ali sharing stage with Hafiz Saeed and addressing the rally were circulated on social media on Friday. The rally was organised by Difa-e-Pakistan Council (DPC) at Liaqat Bagh in Rawalpindi to condemn the recent US Jerusalem move.

Raveesh Kumar further said that Palestinian envoy had been seen at the rally “organised by Jamaat-ud-Daawa (JuD) chief and mastermind of the Mumbai terror attack Hafiz Saeed”. He indicated that government of India will send a strongly worded demarche to the Palestinian government.

India angry over Palestinian Ambassador sharing dais with Hafiz Saeed

Meantime, India has postponed issuing visas to 192 Pakistani nationals for visiting Dargah Hazrat Nizamuddin during annual Urs to be held in early January.

Subramanian Swami, a senior BJP leader had on December 22 criticised government’s decision to vote against Trump’s Jerusalem move saying India made “a huge mistake” by going against “its national interest”.

Swami  further said, “Palestine has never supported India on Kashmir question” while Israel stood with India always”. He recalled that the noteworthy friendship between PM Narendra Modi and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu is a “Marriage made in heaven”.

The controversy was raged between India and Palestine at a time when government of India is preparing to host Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu in January and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit Palestine in February.

Though it is not announced officially yet, Israeli PM Bejnamin Netanyahu is expected to be the Chief Guest at Republic Day; January 26, 2018. Several media outlets discussed the possibility in October-November this year. Netanyahu had also told the Knesset (parliament) in October that he will visit India in January 2018, to reciprocate PM Narendra Modi’s trip earlier this year.

In a balancing act, South Block, has reportedly been working towards scheduling PM Narendra Modi’s visit to Palestine in February.  If he visits Ramallah, the headquarters of Palestinian Authority, it will be his first visit to Palestine.

According to reports from Rawalpindi, Hafiz Saeed used the “Tahaffuz Baitul Maqdas” (Defence of Al-Aqsa mosque, Jerusalem) rally organised by Difa-e-Pakistan Council (DPC) to launch campaign against India and rake up Kashmir issue equating it to Israeli occupation of Palestine.

At the event Hafiz Saeed was quoted saying in Urdu, “We consider it our prime responsibility to liberate Kashmir from India. We will free Kashmir in fulfilment of Jinnah’s dream.”

Hafiz Saeed also criticised Pakistan government for allowing Kulbhushan Jadhav’s family members to meet him in Islamabad. He claimed, “Pakistan let the family of Kulbhushan meet him out of kindness and goodwill, but India sent them with spy devices.” He was referring to the alleged presence of the so-called “metallic device” in the confiscated shoes of Kulbhushan Jadhav’s wife.

PM Modi was the first Indian Prime Minister to visit Israel in July 2017 since 1947, who chose not to visit Palestine during the same trip. Even US President Donald Trump could not avoid visiting Palestine in March this year.

According to the sources, external affairs ministry was particularly upset as the incident of Palestinian ambassador’s sharing dais with Hafiz Saeed came in less than 10 days of India joining 127 other countries at UN to support the resolution criticising Trump’s Jerusalem move of recognising the city as Israeli capital.

Responding to Israel’s protest over its vote at UN, India has clarified that its position on Palestine is “independent and consistent” and “shaped by our views and interests, and not determined by any third country”.

Minister of External Affairs Sushma Swaraj, while making statement in parliament on Thursday, had alleged Pakistan for running anti-India campaign over the shoes of Kulbhushan’s wife. She said Kulbhushan’s family members travelled through flights from Delhi to Dubai by Air India and Dubai to Islamabad by Emirates airlines. The so called device was not detected during security checks.

Sushma Swaraj also criticised Pakistani authorities for violating religious sanctities by removing mangal sutra, bindi and even forcing Jadhav’s mother and wife to change clothes.

In the latest development, Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry issued a press release on Saturday morning saying that in a last minute decision, India has postponed the issuance of visas to 192 Pakistani pilgrims for attending annual Urs celebrations of Nizamuddin Aulia to be held in Delhi from January 1 to 8.

Pakistan has alleged that the non-issuance of visas was in violation of the spirit of 1974 protocol between the two countries on the visits to religious shrines agreement.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com