English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

India to continue trade with Iran despite US sanctions threat

Published

on

India to continue trade with Iran despite US sanctions threat

Sushma Swaraj meets Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif

Despite US threats of imposing “the highest level” of economic sanctions against Iran, India has made it clear that it will continue its trade with that country as New Delhi honors UN sanctions and not the “country specific sanctions”. It has asserted that New Delhi does not formulate its foreign policy “under pressure”.

On Monday, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj clarified on India’s policy towards Iran on two different occasions. After making a statement during her ministry’s annual press briefing clarifying about sanctions against Iran, Sushma Swaraj met Iranian counterpart Javad Zarif  in the evening during which he sought India’s support in salvaging Iran’s nuclear deal in the wake of the US pull out.

According to ministry of external affairs statement, “FM Zarif briefed about the discussions that Iran has undertaken with parties to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) following the US decision to withdraw from the agreement.”

The two top diplomats “discussed bilateral, regional and international issues of mutual interest and assessed the implementation of decisions taken during the visit of President Rouhani to India. They included bilateral cooperation in the areas of connectivity, energy, trade and promotion of people to people contacts”.

The sources said that Iran’s foreign minister sought India’s support to the nuclear deal during his talks with Swaraj. China, Russia and a number of European countries are working to salvage the deal.

It said that Sushma Swaraj conveyed that all parties to the agreement should engage constructively for peaceful resolution of issues that have arisen with respect to it.

Sushma Swaraj, while responding to a question during press briefing, said that New Delhi will keep trading with Iran and will only follow UN sanctions and not those imposed by any other country. She recalled that India continued its trade with Iran during earlier US sanctions.

Read More: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani to visit India

“India follows only UN sanctions and not unilateral sanctions by any country,” she said when asked about New Delhi’s response to the US decision to withdraw from a 2015 nuclear agreement and re-impose sanctions against Tehran.

However, Swaraj emphasized that India rejects “reactionary” policies and will not be dictated to by other countries. “We don’t make our foreign policy under pressure from other countries. We believe in UN sanctions but not in country-specific sanctions,” she pointed out. She added that India’s position was “independent” of any other country and would not make foreign policy “under pressure.”

Zarif’s day-long visit was part of Tehran’s efforts to reach out to major world powers after US pulled out from the 2015 nuclear deal under which Tehran had agreed to stop its sensitive nuclear activities in return for the lifting of crippling economic sanctions.

The Iranian foreign minister has already visited China, Russia and some European countries in the last three weeks after Donald Trump announced US withdrawal from the nuclear deal.

Iran is India’s third largest oil supplier and there were apprehensions about possible impact of the US decision on India’s oil imports. Modi’s government is already facing opposition ire on the unprecedented hike in petrol and diesel prices. Tehran is one of New Delhi’s top oil suppliers.

Read More: Trump’s pull out of Iran N-deal may escalate oil prices

The other members of Iranian delegation accompanying Zarif had separate meetings with their counterparts where they discussed measures for practical cooperation between the two sides.

In 2015 Iran and P5+1, permanent UNSC members and Germany had signed the deal known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) after years of negotiations. It’s implementation began in January 2016. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has on 11 occasions has verified full compliance by Iranian authorities.

On May 8, US President Donald Trump had announced that Washington was walking away from the multilateral deal. He also said that he would reinstate US nuclear sanctions on Iran suspended under the nuclear accord and impose “the highest level” of economic sanctions on Iran.

In February this year, during his meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi visiting Iranian President Hassan Rouhani expressed readiness to expand mutual relations in all areas.

Read More: India sends first wheat shipment for Afghanistan via Iranian Chabahar port

During Rouhani’s visit Iran awarded a much-awaited agreement to India over the management of part of its strategic Chabahar port – a move that could enable India to dodge Pakistan and reach markets in Afghanistan, Central Asia and beyond.

Read More: Iran: More Indian ports may transit through Chabahar port

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com