English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Cricket news

Can on-field umpires refer to third umpire to check over-the-waist no-ball? Here’s what rules say

Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal no ball, the MCC’s Law 41.7.1 mentioned.

Published

on

ipl 2022

The on-field umpires decision in the IPL 2022 match between Delhi Capitals and the Rajasthan Royals (RR) has became the talk of the town.

Rovman Powell hit for six on the third delivery of the final over of the match bowled by RR pacer Obed McCoy. The left-arm pacer bowled a waist-high full toss to Powell, however, the on-field umpires thought that it was a legitimate delivery and hence didn’t check it with the third umpire.

https://twitter.com/prabhas_mania17/status/1517568146420293632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1517568146420293632%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.firstpost.com%2Ffirstcricket%2Fsports-news%2Fexplained-the-no-ball-controversy-that-rocked-dc-vs-rr-clash-and-why-umpires-didnt-refer-the-decision-upstairs-10590301.html

While the replays showed that it was going over the batter’s waist, the umpires stayed with their call despite Delhi Capitals’ protest. However, Rishabh Pant and Company weren’t really happy with the call and laid out a protest by sending assistant coach Praveen Amre onto the field. The Capitals act has not helped them to change the on-umpires and they stayed adamant and didn’t refer the call upstairs to the TV umpire.

Later, the DC skipper tried to call his players back to dugout.

Ideally, if the on-field umpires didn’t give a no-ball straightaway they would’ve referred to the third umpire if either of them wasn’t sure if it was a legal delivery or not. However, the IPL playing conditions don’t allow the on-field umpires to do the same on a regular ball.

The delivery would have been checked for a no-ball if Powell was dismissed on the delivery. However, without a dismissal, even if everyone on the ground thought that it was a no-ball, the on-field umpire’s decision was final.

Read Also: No ball controversy: Here’s what Delhi Capitals captain Rishabh Pant, coach Shane Watson said in post-match conference

As per the law, the on-field umpires cannot refer decisions other than for dismissals to the third umpire and in the IPL only dismissals and front foot no balls can be referred to the third umpire by the on-field umpires.

Only, the decisions on run out, stumping, hit wicket, caught, boundary, and batter running to the same end can check with the third umpire after on-field umpires’ reference.

Expressing his views on Twitter, a few argued that Pant’s actions were against the spirit of the game while others felt that the onus was on the umpires to take it upstairs or for the third umpire to intervene and check the decision.

Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal no ball, the MCC’s Law 41.7.1 mentioned.

After Irfan Pathan, Amit Mishra says India has potential to be the greatest country only if they follow THIS

IPL 2022: Mumbai Indians hit new low by becoming the first team to achieve THIS record

Cricket news

Team India explains Ayush Badoni’s ODI call-up after Washington Sundar injury

Team India has explained the rationale behind Ayush Badoni’s ODI selection, saying his all-round ability helps maintain bowling balance after Washington Sundar’s injury.

Published

on

Ayush badoni

Team India has addressed the debate surrounding Ayush Badoni’s surprise inclusion in the ODI squad for the New Zealand series following Washington Sundar’s injury. Indian batting coach Sitanshu Kotak clarified that Badoni’s selection was driven by balance requirements rather than experimentation.

Washington Sundar was ruled out of the remaining two ODIs against New Zealand due to injury, prompting the selectors to bring in the Delhi all-rounder. While the move sparked discussion, with some observers backing Riyan Parag or Rinku Singh, the team management has defended its decision.

Team management highlights need for all-round option

Speaking ahead of the second ODI, Kotak said the team could not afford to go into a match with only five bowling options, especially in the absence of Sundar.

He explained that Badoni offers flexibility, noting that if a frontline bowler were to get injured mid-match, the team would still need someone capable of bowling four to five overs. Kotak added that while Sundar is a more established all-rounder, teams often opt for players who can contribute with both bat and ball, even if bowling is a secondary skill.

Kotak also pointed to Badoni’s consistent performances in India A matches and white-ball cricket, stating that his ability to bat in the middle order and bowl right-arm off-breaks made him a like-for-like replacement in terms of team balance.

Strong domestic and India A performances

Badoni has impressed in List A cricket, scoring 693 runs in 27 matches at an average of 36.47 and a strike rate above 93. His record includes one century and five half-centuries. With the ball, he has taken 18 wickets at an economy rate of 4.54.

During the South Africa A tour of India last year, Badoni scored 66 in an unofficial ODI and delivered economical bowling spells across two matches. He also contributed during Australia A’s tour, picking up three wickets in two games while adding runs in limited opportunities.

IPL experience adds to credentials

The 24-year-old has featured in 56 IPL matches for Lucknow Super Giants, scoring 963 runs at a strike rate of 138.56. Known for his composure in the middle order, Badoni has registered six IPL half-centuries, strengthening his case as a reliable white-ball option.

Kotak wished Badoni well, expressing confidence that the youngster’s exposure at domestic, India A, and IPL levels has prepared him for the international stage.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

No problem if Pakistan or UAE host matches, says Bangladesh official on T20 World Cup uncertainty

Bangladesh have reiterated their reluctance to play T20 World Cup 2026 matches in India, with a senior government official saying there would be no issue if Pakistan or the UAE hosted the games.

Published

on

Bangladesh

With less than a month to go before the start of the 2026 ICC Men’s T20 World Cup, uncertainty continues over Bangladesh’s group-stage matches scheduled to be played in India. Bangladesh are slated to play four matches in the group stage — three in Kolkata and one in Mumbai — but the Bangladesh Cricket Board has expressed reservations about touring India, citing security concerns.

The issue gained traction following the release of Bangladesh pacer Mustafizur Rahman from his IPL franchise, Kolkata Knight Riders, on the instructions of the BCCI for undisclosed reasons. Subsequently, the Bangladesh Cricket Board approached the International Cricket Council, seeking a shift of its matches to Sri Lanka, one of the tournament’s hosts.

Amid the developments, reports have suggested that Pakistan has offered to host Bangladesh’s matches if they are moved out of India.

Bangladesh government reacts to venue row

Responding to questions on the possibility of shifting matches to another Indian city, Bangladesh government’s Sports Advisor Asif Nazrul made it clear that the concern is with playing in India, not with specific venues.

“We are talking about India, we are not talking about Kolkata. If the venue is changed from India to Sri Lanka, there is no issue,” Nazrul said on Wednesday. He added that he had seen reports claiming Pakistan had offered to host the matches, though he could not verify their authenticity.

“No problem if Pakistan or UAE host our matches,” Nazrul said, signalling openness to alternative venues outside India.

Claims over ICC security assessment

Nazrul also claimed that the Bangladesh Cricket Board had received a communication from the ICC’s security team, outlining scenarios under which the security threat to the Bangladesh team could increase. According to him, the letter mentioned the inclusion of Mustafizur Rahman in the squad, Bangladeshi supporters wearing national jerseys, and the upcoming national elections as potential risk factors.

Based on this, Nazrul asserted that Bangladesh was not in a position to play its World Cup matches in India.

ICC rejects Bangladesh advisor’s claims

The ICC, however, rejected the interpretation presented by the Bangladesh government official. An ICC source clarified that independent security assessments carried out by internationally recognised experts do not conclude that Bangladesh cannot play its scheduled matches in India.

According to the ICC, the overall security risk for the tournament in India has been assessed as low to moderate, consistent with other major global sporting events. The assessment did not identify any specific or direct threat to the Bangladesh team, officials, or match venues in Kolkata and Mumbai, and found no risks that could not be managed through standard security measures.

For now, the fate of Bangladesh’s group-stage matches remains unresolved, with the ICC yet to announce any changes to the existing schedule.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

India beat New Zealand by four wickets as KL Rahul holds nerve after Kohli’s near-miss ton

KL Rahul kept his cool in the final overs as India defeated New Zealand by four wickets in the first ODI, overcoming a late wobble after Virat Kohli’s dismissal on 93.

Published

on

Virat Kohli

India registered a hard-fought four-wicket victory over New Zealand in the first ODI in Vadodara on Sunday, with KL Rahul holding his nerve in the final overs after Virat Kohli narrowly missed out on a landmark century.

Chasing a target of 301, India appeared firmly in control for most of the innings, led by Kohli’s composed 93 off 91 balls. The former India captain struck eight fours and a six, anchoring the chase before falling seven runs short of what would have been his 85th international hundred.

Kohli’s dismissal triggered a brief collapse, allowing New Zealand back into the contest. However, Rahul remained calm under pressure, scoring an unbeaten 29 off 21 balls. His decisive penultimate over, featuring two boundaries and a six, ensured India crossed the line with six balls to spare.

Earlier, Shubman Gill contributed 56 while Shreyas Iyer looked set for a half-century before being bowled for 49. Harshit Rana also played a crucial cameo, adding 29 off 23 balls at a tense stage of the chase.

Despite disciplined spells from the New Zealand bowlers, India reached 306 for 6 in 49 overs to take a 1-0 lead in the three-match series.

New Zealand innings

Batting first, New Zealand posted a competitive 300 for 8. Daryl Mitchell led the charge with a counter-attacking 84 off 71 balls after early pressure from India’s pace attack. Henry Nicholls and Devon Conway also chipped in with half-centuries to provide stability to the innings.

India’s bowlers managed to pull things back at the death, preventing the visitors from pushing beyond the 300-run mark.

Key milestone and award

During his innings, Kohli became the fastest player to reach 28,000 international runs, achieving the milestone in his 624th innings, surpassing the previous record held by Sachin Tendulkar.

Despite missing out on a century, Kohli was named Player of the Match for his decisive contribution in the chase.

The second ODI of the series will be played on January 14.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com