English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Israel and Syria exchange most extensive missile strikes

Published

on

Israel and Syria exchange most extensive missile strikes

Earlier Tel Aviv claimed of killing 15 including 8 Iranians

In another major development in the Middle East on Thursday morning, Israel and Syria have exchanged barrage of missiles, considered to be the most extensive strikes in decades. Israel claimed attacking dozens of Iranian targets in Syria in response to 20 rockets fired at Israeli military outposts.

Earlier, Israel had claimed of carrying out an attack on a military base south of Damascus, which was used by Iranian forces. London based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it killed at least 15 people, including eight Iranians. Killing of two civilians was confirmed by Syrian news agency.

The Israeli claim of hitting Iranian targets in Syria came one day after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Tehran of preparing to attack Israel saying “For the past months, Iran has been transferring weapons to its forces in Syria”.

While addressing live on television on Tuesday night, after Trump announced of withdrawing from Iran nuclear deal, Netanyahu said, We will react with force” to any attack. He also said “The army is prepared, the army is strong, and whoever will try us will feel well the strength of our army”.

According to Israel’s leading daily Haaretz, the Israeli military has accused Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ Al Quds force and its commander Maj Gen Qassem Soleimani, of launching the attack at the “Israeli Golan Heights”. This is the first time Israel has directly accused Iran of firing toward Israeli territory, the daily said.

Read More: Syria threatens to respond any future Israeli aggression

Israel has claimed of intercepting four of the rockets by its Iron Dome air defense system and the rest of the rockets exploded on Syrian territory. Tel Aviv has also said there were no casualties in the attack.

Israel has also claimed that the targets included weapons storage, logistics sites and intelligence centers used by elite Iranian forces in Syria. It has also claimed of destroying several Syrian air-defense systems after coming under heavy fire. It said none of its warplanes was hit.

Israel and Syria exchange most extensive missile strikes

Haaretz further said that a source in the Israeli security establishment said this attack was the largest carried out by Israel since it signed a disengagement agreement with Syria in May 1974.

Contradicting the Israeli claims, Syrian air defenses have claimed of repelling an Israeli missile aggression on Syrian territories, shooting down scores of missiles. It has claimed of intercepting rockets fired from Israeli aircraft after Tel Aviv targeted Syrian army positions in the “occupied Golan Heights”.

Read More: Israel claims most significant attacks on Syria, Russia cautions Tel Aviv

Syrian official news agency SANA, reported the Israeli aggressions targeted air defense battalions and radars in Syria with missiles fired by “enemy warplanes” from within the occupied territories. Earlier it claimed of intercepting barrage of Israeli missiles after some 20 projectiles were launched from Syrian soil at Israeli positions in the Golan Heights in response to an earlier Israeli shelling on Quneitra province.

SANA reports that the Syrian air defenses were “confronting a new wave of Israeli aggression rockets and downing them one after the other”. However, referring to a military source, it added that Israeli rocket fire had hit a Syrian radar site and an ammunition warehouse.

Earlier Syrian media said that Israeli troops had shelled the city of Ba’ath in the southern province of Quneitra. No casualties have been reported from any of the incidents.

Read More: UN Head calls for de-escalation in Syria-Israel theatre

A Syrian correspondent from Quneitra reports on Thursday that Syrian air defenses shot down Israeli missiles over Ba’ath city.

Earlier on Tuesday, when Trump announced US withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal, Israeli missiles targeted Syrian army positions in the Kishweh area south of Damascus. On the same day Israel had reportedly instructed local authorities to “unlock and ready (bomb) shelters” for the settlers.

SANA reports that aggression took place less than 24s after the Syrian air defenses shot down two Israeli missiles over Kishweh area in Damascus countryside.

Israeli media claim of  “Israel’s Golan Heights” is factually wrong. In fact Israel seized the Syrian Golan Heights during 1967 six day war and has continued to occupy two-thirds of the strategically important territory ever since, in a move which has never recognized by international community.

Israel has been frequently using the occupied Golan Heights to carry out military operations against Syrian territories.

Read More: Israeli F-16 shot down by Syrians, Tel Aviv hit Iranian drone

Tehran based Press TV and Iran’s official news agency IRNA have so far neither confirmed nor denied Israel targeting Iranian military installations in Syria. Instead, Iranian media has reported the exchange of missile attacks between Israeli and Syrian forces.

SANA report says that the command of the Lebanese Army said that four Israeli warplanes violated its airspace at the same time as the aggression took place.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com