English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin’s son Udhayanidhi sparks controversy, says Sanatana dharma like malaria

Sanatana should be eliminated, not fought against. The word Sanatana originates in Sanskrit. It is against social justice and equality, according to Udhayanidhi Stalin, the DMK government’s minister for youth welfare and sports development.

Published

on

Udhayanidhi Stalin, the son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, stirred controversy on Saturday when he compared Sanatana dharma to dengue and malaria and said it should be eradicated rather than simply resisted.

Sanatana dharma is opposed to social justice and equality, according to Udhayanidhi Stalin, who was speaking at a Sanatana Abolition Conference.

During the conference he said, few things cannot be opposed, that should be abolished only. He said, we can’t oppose dengue, mosquitoes, malaria or corona. We have to eradicate this, he also said. That’s how we have to eradicate Sanatana, Udhayanidhi Stalin said.

Sanatana should be eliminated, not fought against. The word Sanatana originates in Sanskrit. It is against social justice and equality, according to Udhayanidhi Stalin, the DMK government’s minister for youth welfare and sports development.

BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya criticised Udhayanidhi Stalin for his comments regarding Sanatana dharma and claimed that he was calling for the genocide of 80% of the population.

Udhayanidhi Stalin, son of Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin, and the son of Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin, has connected Sanatana dharma to malaria and dengue. He believes it ought to be completely destroyed, not only condemned. In essence, he is advocating the extermination of the Sanatana dharma adherents who make up 80% of Bharat’s people. The DMK is a well-known opposition figure and the Congress’s longtime ally. Was this the outcome of the meeting in Mumbai? Amit Malviya tweeted on X, formerly known Twitter.

Notably, the DMK is a member of the opposition INDIA group, whose leaders most recently gathered in Mumbai to plan measures for taking on the BJP-led NDA in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

Udhayanidhi Stalin responded to the BJP leader by claiming that he never asked for the genocide of Sanatana dharma adherents.

He claimed that he stood by what he stated and that he was speaking for underrepresented groups who, in his opinion, were suffering as a result of Sanatana dharma.

The DMK leader said, he would be ready to defend his comments in court if necessary. He declared that, under the direction of MK Stalin, the DMK government would work to maintain social justice and create an egalitarian society.

India News

In Manipur, Kuki-Zo groups launch counter-economic blockade

Published

on

By

Kuki-Zo organisations on Thursday launched a counter-economic blockade in Manipur, demanding that the Centre and the state government ensure uninterrupted movement of essential commodities to the hill districts amid renewed tensions over access to the highways.

The counter-blockade comes in response to the ongoing disruption of traffic on Manipur’s major transport routes with Kuki-Zo groups alleging restrictions on goods have hit residents of hill areas. They urged authorities to restore the free movement of food, medicines, fuel and other essential supplies, saying civilians should not bear the weight of the ongoing ethnic conflict.

In a joint statement, the organisations said the protest would continue until the government took concrete steps to guarantee safe passage for essential commodities and secure national highways. They also appealed to the authorities to prevent any further obstruction to the supply chain and ensure that relief and emergency services remain unaffected.

The development follows heightened tensions over the movement of vehicles on Manipur’s trunk routes, which serve as the primary lifeline for transporting goods across the state. The blockade is expected to impact logistics and transportation if the deadlock continues.

Security has been tightened along vulnerable stretches of highways, with additional personnel deployed to maintain law and order and facilitate the movement of essential supplies. Officials said the administration is monitoring the situation and is making efforts to prevent further escalation while ensuring that basic commodities continue to reach affected areas.

Manipur has witnessed repeated disruptions to road connectivity since ethnic violence erupted in the state, with competing blockades affecting supply of essential goods and normal life. The latest counter-blockade highlights the continuing challenges facing the administration in restoring stability and maintaining uninterrupted access to critical transport routes.

Continue Reading

India News

Can’t lathicharge a peaceful protest, says Supreme Court

Published

on

By

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the Delhi Police action leading to lathicharges during the student protest at Jantar Mantar on July 20.

The bench of Chief Justice of India Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana observed that a peaceful protest can’t be net with a lathicharge. The court made the remarks while hearing petitions against excessive force used by Delhi Police against students protesting irregularities in the NEET-UG 2026 examination and other public examinations.

The court said the right to peaceful and lawful protest is under the protection of the Constitution. The court observed that the presence of a protest can’t be a ground for police action and said that any allegation of police excess has to be independently examined.

The petitions concern the events of July 20, when thousands of students and supporters of the Cockroach Janta Party tried to march from at Jantar Mantar to Parliament as the Monsoon Session opened. The protesters were demanding action on paper leaks, examination system reforms and government accountability.

Police said they had stopped the march because of security concerns and restrictions in central Delhi. There was a clash later and police used tear gas and lathi charge to disperse the crowd. Over a 100 protesters and a similar number of police were injured in the incident.

The petitioners had sought an independent probe into the police action during the hearing. They also demanded the retention of CCTV footage, body-camera recordings and other electronic evidence, as well as compensation for those injured in the crackdown.

The case comes amid a nationwide debate over reforms of examinations and the handling of student protests. The Centre has brought in legislative measures to strengthen anti-paper leak laws, even as student organizations continue to demand greater accountability.

Continue Reading

India News

Bill against paper leaks eclipsed by Opposition push for Amit Shah reply

Published

on

By

Amit Shah

The Monsoon Session of Parliament witnessed Opposition-Government scenes on Monday as Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh introduced the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha.

The Bill aims to strengthen laws against examination paper leaks and organized cheating following the NEET-UG 2026 controversy.

During the discussions, the Opposition Congress demanded Home Minister Amit Shah’s reply to allegations of police excesses on July 20 during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) march to Parliament. Over 100 students were treated for injuries ranging from fractures to pellet wounds. CRPF personnel have confirmed seven rounds of pellets were fired and five rounds were fired at the students.

Congress leader Pawan Khera said such force should not have been used against the students and the Home Minister must reply to the allegations. Following disruptions, the House was adjourned several times.

The legislation seeks to impose stricter penalties for paper leaks, organized examination fraud, and other unfair practices. It also provides for faster investigations, time-bound trials, and the establishment of a STF to investigate major examination-related offenses. According to the government, the amendments are intended to improve transparency, protect the credibility of public examinations, and restore students’ confidence in the system.

The Congress and several Opposition parties demanded a detailed discussion in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, arguing that the government must be held accountable for both the examination irregularities and the police response.

The debate comes days after the resignation of former Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, following weeks of nationwide protests over paper leaks and examination malpractice. While the Centre has announced reforms and introduced the amendment Bill, Opposition leaders maintain that legislative changes alone are insufficient without fixing responsibility for the controversy and the police action against students.

The government defended its response, stating that it has initiated investigations into examination fraud, introduced stricter legal provisions, and taken steps to strengthen the security of public examinations. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju urged MPs to participate in the debate and allow the House to function smoothly instead of disrupting proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com