English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Mulayam echoes Modi on Akhilesh: ‘Jo baap ka nahi, woh kisi ka nahi’

Published

on

Mulayam singh and Modi

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]SP patriarch stopped shy of announcing new party but reiterated that he doesn’t endorse decisions taken by his son

A formal split within the Samajwadi Party (SP) looks imminent. Although contrary to expectations, the party’s patriarch – Mulayam Singh Yadav – did not announce a new political outfit while interacting with the media in Lucknow, on Monday, he gave ample indications that walking out of the party he founded was now a matter of “when” and not “if”.

Echoing sentiments of Prime Minister Narendra Modi about SP chief Akhilesh Yadav, Mulayam said: “the man who occupies the highest political office of the country had said in Kannauj – jo baap ka nahi, woh kisi ka nahi (one who isn’t loyal to his father, can’t be loyal to anyone else) – need I say anything else now”.

Mulayam – the SP founder – was replying to a volley of questions on whether there was any possibility of a rapprochement between him and his son Akhilesh.

Though in the run up to his interaction with the media on Monday it was largely speculated that Netaji (as Mulayam is usually referred to) would formally announce a split in his party and possibly take over the Lok Dal as its national president – a rumour that was only strengthened further by Lok Dal chief Sunil Singh’s assertion to this effect – the political warhorse refrained from doing so.

“I am not forming a new party as of now”, Mulayam told reporters who pointedly asked him if he was finally moving away from the SP due to continuing differences with his son. Journalists even asked the SP founder why he was staying put in the party when he clearly didn’t approve of Akhilesh’s leadership and had been “betrayed” by his son who had earlier this year claimed that Mulayam would take over the party as its president after the UP assembly elections.

“I have been betrayed and everyone knows that,” Mulayam said. Asserting that as Akhilesh’s father, he will always “wish him well”, Mulayam said, “I don’t endorse the decisions being taken by him (as SP chief). The former three-term UP chief minister also said that he will “soon come before you all (the media) and give details” of the decision taken by Akhilesh that he doesn’t support.

Interestingly, Mulayam younger brother, Shivpal Yadav – the man because of whom differences between the father and son are said to have reached a point of no return – was conspicuous by his absence from Monday’s interaction. Mulayam said that Shivpal was “away on some important work in Etawah and Mainpuri (the political bastion of the SP clan)”.

Akhilesh Shivpal

Differences between Mulayam and Akhilesh came out in the open in the run up to the UP Assembly elections that were held earlier. Sources in the party had claimed then that while Akhilesh wanted the party to shed its image of an outfit that functioned purely as a family enterprise and particularly hoped to check Shivpal’s growing influence and alleged bullying tactics, Mulayam was favourably inclined towards Shivpal, the man who holds significant clout over the party’s grassroots cadre.

The differences between the father-son duo have split the party down the middle – though formalization of this split has been deferred for reasons best known to the Yadav clan. While a large chunk of the party’s old guard and a significant cadre base remains loyal to Mulayam and Shivpal, the more aspirational new guard along with some veterans like Mulayam’s cousin Ramgopal Yadav and former minister Azam Khan have stuck with Akhilesh Yadav.

Sources said that while Mulayam is set to launch his breakaway faction – though on Monday he continued to insist that Akhilesh was out of the Samajwadi Party as “his decisions don’t adhere to the party’s wishes” – he wants to first comprehensively gauge the political repercussions of such a move. There is already a buzz that Shivpal is in talks with the BJP for an alliance between Mulayam’s faction and the ruling party.

However, sources close to Akhilesh claim that the SP chief is himself contemplating ways to pip his father in this race and could announce his own outfit – a remodelled version of the current party – in the next few weeks.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com