English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

NGT bans protests at Jantar Mantar, civil society groups enraged

Published

on

NGT bans protests at Jantar Mantar, civil society groups enraged

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The protest hotspot in the national capital was the venue of the 2011 Lokpal agitation by Anna Hazare which set the pace for UPA government’s ouster

The National Green Tribunal’s (NGT) decision to ban all protests and dharnas around the historic Jantar Mantar area – a known hotspot of many an agitations over the past decades – on grounds that such activities violate environmental laws, has irked civil society groups that would often use the venue for raising their voice against the government on crucial issues.

On Thursday, the green panel had said that the Delhi government had “failed” to protect the right to a pollution-free environment of the citizens living in the area around Jantar Mantar. It had also reprimanded the authorities concerned for failing to ensure that right of the people to a peaceful and comfortable life are not infringed by those who create noise pollution while exercising their right to freedom of speech and expression, which the NGT said, “can never be unlimited”.

The NGT Bench headed by Justice RS Rathore directed the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) to remove all temporary structures, loud speakers and public address systems from the stretch of the Jantar Mantar Road. The municipal body was also directed to remove the garbage lying in the area and clean it within four weeks.

The Tribunal directed the authorities to shift the protesters, agitators and people holding dharnas at Jantar Mantar to the Ramlila Ground near Old Delhi’s Ajmeri Gate “forthwith”.

The NGT’s verdict came on a plea filed by Varun Seth and others alleging that processions and agitations held by social groups, political parties, NGOs at the Jantar Mantar Road were a major source of noise pollution in the area.

“It is amply clear that the petitioners are suffering because of gross violation of laws, air pollution and health hazards due to lack of cleanliness and non- performance of duty by the authorities,” the Bench noted.

The NGT has ordered the NDMC chairman, the city Police Commissioner and the Delhi government to file compliance reports within five weeks.

The NDMC and Delhi police, which stand to obviously benefit from the ban – both outfits are under tremendous pressure when protests happen at Jantar Mantar since it is a VIP area and lies in close proximity to the Parliament – have welcomed the NGT’s order.

According to Delhi Police, on an average eight to ten demonstrations are held daily at Jantar Mantar. Till June 2017, 2,283 dharnas and demonstrations were held as compared to 1,921 in the same period during the year 2016.

It is at Jantar Mantar that social activist Anna Hazare had, in 2011, started his Lokpal agitation against the UPA government. Hazare’s agitation had forced the then Congress-led central government under Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh to re-draft the Lokpal Bill after an unprecedented move of forming a joint committee of Union ministers and Hazare’s ‘civil society’ nominees. The agitation had also catapulted Arvind Kejriwal, then a mere activist of the India Against Corruption campaign, to become Delhi’s leading political figure – something that he used to good effect to launch the Aam Aadmi Party despite Hazare’s reservations and eventually sweep the Delhi assembly polls to become the state’s chief minister. Hazare’s protest had also drawn in people like yoga guru and businessman Ramdev, former Army chief General (retired) VK Singh (before he joined the BJP), advocate Prashant Bhushan, etc.

Jantar Mantar had also seen a major protest in 2015 by Army veterans who were demanding ‘One Rank One Pension’ and pay commission benefits. The agitation had hit the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led BJP government hard and forced it to consider the demands.

Understandably, civil society groups and common citizens who have used Jantar Mantar in the past as a protest venue are not happy with the NGT’s order. Several of these members and even journalists, who viewed Jantar Mantar as the only spot in the national capital where dissent against the Centre was not muzzled, took to Twitter and other social media platforms to vent their ire.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

“Will die but won’t give up”: Sahil Wakode’s parents urge IIT students to continue fight 

Sahil Wakode’s parents have appealed to IIT Bombay students to continue their fight for justice amid the ongoing investigation into their son’s death.

Published

on

Sahil Wakode

The parents of IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode have appealed to students to continue raising their voices and fighting for justice following their son’s death.

Sahil Wakode, a second-year student at IIT Bombay, died in his hostel room on September 18. His death has led to student protests and an ongoing investigation by the Mumbai Crime Branch.

What Sahil Wakode’s parents have alleged

Sahil’s parents have alleged that their son faced caste-based discrimination and harassment at IIT Bombay before his death. They have sought action against those they hold responsible and have demanded a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

The family has also called for a CBI inquiry and has sought the arrest of officials named in the case. These remain allegations and are part of the ongoing investigation.

The Mumbai Crime Branch took over the probe after an FIR was registered following the complaint by Sahil’s parents.

IIT Bombay’s position

IIT Bombay has said that Sahil was allegedly caught using a mobile phone during a mid-semester examination and had uploaded the question paper to ChatGPT to seek answers.

The institute has maintained that no disciplinary action had been initiated against him. It said the matter had been discussed with him by the instructor and the Head of the Department, who counselled him and assured him that the incident would not adversely affect his academic career.

The circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death are being investigated by the appropriate authorities.

Investigation continues

The case remains under investigation, with the Mumbai Crime Branch examining the circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death and the allegations made by his family.

His parents have continued to demand justice and action against those they believe were responsible, while the investigation is expected to establish the facts surrounding the case.

Continue Reading

India News

Gyanesh Kumar meets election commissioners amid poll panel row

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar met Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi amid a controversy over reported objections to Election Commission decisions.

Published

on

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar held a meeting with Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi amid an ongoing controversy over the functioning and decision-making process of the Election Commission of India.

The meeting comes days after a report raised questions over formal objections allegedly recorded by the two Election Commissioners regarding several decisions and orders of the poll panel.

The Election Commission has maintained that differing views, observations and suggestions are part of its normal deliberative process. It has also said that all decisions taken by the full Commission over the past year were unanimous.

What is the Election Commission controversy?

The controversy followed a report that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had raised objections on at least 14 occasions over a 10-month period.

The reported objections included issues concerning changes to Form 6, the handling of additions and deletions from electoral rolls and the centralisation of electoral-roll data.

Form 6 is the statutory form used for applying for registration as a voter.

The Election Commission, however, has disputed the suggestion that the objections amounted to dissent over final decisions. The poll body said written notes, observations, technical suggestions and internal checks and balances are standard parts of its functioning.

ECI says decisions were unanimous

The poll panel has said that all decisions taken by it during the past year were the outcome of unanimous decisions of the full Commission.

It also said that operational queries or inputs raised during the drafting stage are part of the normal administrative process and are intended to improve electoral procedures and safeguard voter rights.

The issue has gained significance because the Election Commission is conducting electoral-roll revisions, including the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), in several parts of the country.

Opposition parties have questioned the functioning of the poll panel and have cited the reported objections by the two Election Commissioners in their criticism of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Political parties seek clarification

The controversy has also prompted calls for greater clarity from political parties, including some parties that are allies of the BJP-led NDA.

LJP (Ram Vilas) chief Chirag Paswan, TDP Lok Sabha floor leader Lavu Srikrishna Devarayalu and Rashtriya Lok Morcha chief Upendra Kushwaha have sought clarification from the Election Commission regarding concerns surrounding the voter-list revision and the reported objections.

The Election Commission has continued to maintain that its decisions have followed the applicable laws, rules and established procedures.

Continue Reading

India News

Gandhi Parivar vs Sangh Parivar, Revanth Reddy’s remark sparks BJP attack

Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy’s remarks contrasting the Gandhi Parivar with the Sangh Parivar triggered a BJP response accusing Congress of prioritising the Gandhi family.

Published

on

Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy’s remarks comparing the Gandhi Parivar and Sangh Parivar have triggered a political exchange, with the BJP hitting back at the Congress leader.

Speaking in Kerala on Friday, Mr Reddy described the contest over India’s future as a fight between the two “parivars”. He said the Gandhi family had made sacrifices for the country while accusing the Sangh Parivar of attempting to divide India on the basis of religion, caste, region and language.

What Revanth Reddy said

Mr Reddy cited Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi while speaking about what he described as sacrifices made by the Gandhi family.

He also referred to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi, saying they had given up positions, power and high office.

The Telangana Chief Minister said he had no remaining personal political ambitions and described his objective as working towards a Congress-led government at the Centre with Rahul Gandhi as Prime Minister.

Mr Reddy also appealed to people to stand with the Gandhi Parivar and oppose the Sangh Parivar. He described the latter as a threat to India’s democracy.

BJP hits back

The BJP responded to Mr Reddy’s remarks on Saturday.

BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari said the Telangana Chief Minister’s comments amounted to an admission that Congress’s objective was to bring the Gandhi family back to power.

He also linked Mr Reddy’s remarks to the ongoing political debate around “vote chori”, the Election Commission, the Constitution and democracy, arguing that the Congress’s focus was instead on the Gandhi family.

The exchange adds to the political confrontation between the BJP and Congress, with Mr Reddy presenting the Gandhi Parivar and Sangh Parivar as opposing forces in India’s political future, while the BJP has interpreted his remarks as evidence of Congress’s focus on the Gandhi family.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com