English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Not just Taj Mahal, Delhi’s Jama Masjid also built atop a temple: BJP MP Vinay Katiyar

Published

on

Not just Taj Mahal, Delhi’s Jama Masjid also built atop a temple: BJP MP Vinay Katiyar

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Amid Babri Masjid-Ram Janmbhoomi title suit row, BJP MP Vinay Katiyar claims 6000 places destroyed by Mughal emperors, including Jama Masjid and Taj Mahal

Two days after the Supreme Court adjourned till February 8 its hearing on the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmbhoomi title suit, BJP’s Kanpur MP Vinay Katiyar stoked another controversy on Thursday by claiming that the historic Jama Masjid in New Delhi was built by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan atop a destroyed temple – the Jamuna Devi Mandir.

The claim by Katiyar, known for his hate speeches against the Muslim community, come months after he reiterated an already trashed theory pushed by Hindutva hardliners and self-styled historians about the Taj Mahal, also commissioner by Shah Jahan, being built above a Hindu temple dedicated to Lord Shiva and called Tejo Mahalaya.

Katiyar told news agency ANI that “there were about 6000 places that were broken down by Mughal emperors” and that Delhi Jama Masjid and Agra’s Taj Mahal were both built over razed temples.

[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]

On October 18, Katiyar had joined other BJP leaders like Rajya Sabha member Subramanian Swamy and Uttar Pradesh MLA Sangeet Som to claim that the iconic Taj Mahal was a “symbol of slavery” and “barbarism of the Muslim rulers”.

“The Mughals destroyed our temple. Taj Mahal is a Hindu temple. Symbols of our Gods and Goddesses can be found there…Water from a great height used to drip on the Shivling kept in the temple. They (the Mughals) have removed the Shivling and built a mausoleum,” Katiyar had said.

The comments by the Kanpur MP come at a time when the BJP and Congress are engaged in a vitriolic verbal duel over the long pending Babri Masjid-Ram Janmbhoomi title suit that is being heard by the Supreme Court. On December 5, a day before the 25th anniversary of the demolition of Babri Masjid by Hindutva mobs affiliated with the BJP and RSS in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court had decided to adjourn proceedings in the title suit till February 8.

Appearing for one of the Muslim litigants in the case, senior advocate Kapil Sibal had requested the Supreme Court Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra to postpone the hearing in the title suit until July 2019. Sibal had argued that the verdict would have repercussions outside the court and disturb law and order in the country and had questioned the “hurry” in concluding the hearing.

A day later, addressing an election rally in his home-state of Gujarat, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had sought to use Sibal’s stand in the court to slam the Congress party over the “sin of keeping important issues unresolved” for electoral gains even as he lauded the Sunni Waqf Board of Uttar Pradesh for disagreeing with Kapil Sibal’s arguments.

On Thursday, Sibal clarified that he was not representing the Sunni Waqf Board and sought to de-link his roles as a professional lawyer and a Congress politician. “First of all, I am a professional. I represented Iqbal Ansari,” he said.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Mamata Banerjee warns BJP, EC over Bengal polls, says they will be accountable

Mamata Banerjee holds BJP and Election Commission responsible for any incidents during Bengal polls, raising concerns over officer transfers.

Published

on

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has held the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Election Commission of India responsible for any untoward incidents in the state during the upcoming assembly elections, following the transfer of key officials.

Addressing concerns over administrative reshuffles, Banerjee said that changes involving senior bureaucrats, including the chief secretary and home secretary, could affect governance and law and order in the state during a crucial period.

The Trinamool Congress chief also announced candidates for 291 constituencies for the elections scheduled to be held in two phases on April 23 and 29.

Criticising the Election Commission, Banerjee alleged that the transfers were being carried out in a manner that benefits the BJP. She questioned the timing of the decisions and said such actions weaken the state administration at a sensitive time.

She further raised concerns about disaster management and essential services, stating that experienced officials familiar with the state’s situation have been replaced. According to her, this could impact administrative efficiency if any emergency arises before the new government is formed.

Protecting Bengal’s identity

Banerjee emphasised that the election is not merely about forming a government but about safeguarding Bengal’s identity and existence. She accused the BJP of misusing central agencies and attempting to influence the electoral process.

She urged that elections should be conducted peacefully, without external interference, and in line with democratic principles. The chief minister also expressed confidence that her party would return to power with a stronger mandate.

Appealing to voters, she called for support for the Trinamool Congress, asserting that the people of Bengal will ultimately decide the outcome and protect their democratic rights.

Continue Reading

India News

Centre assures action on LPG supply disruption, court closes distributors’ plea

The Bombay High Court closed a plea by LPG distributors after the Centre assured diplomatic efforts to stabilise supply amid global disruptions.

Published

on

LPG cylinder

The Union government on Tuesday informed the Bombay High Court that it is taking diplomatic steps to address disruptions in Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) supply linked to the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, following which the court disposed of a petition filed by LPG distributors.

Appearing before the Nagpur bench, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the Centre was actively engaged in international-level negotiations to stabilise LPG supply. However, he noted that specific measures could not be disclosed due to their sensitive nature.

The matter was heard by a division bench comprising Justices Anil S Kilor and Raj D Wakode. The bench accepted the government’s assurances and closed the plea.

Distributors flagged supply disruption in Vidarbha

The petition was filed by six LPG distributors, including Omkar Sales, who raised concerns over disruptions in supply chains across Maharashtra’s Vidarbha region. They claimed the situation had led to a significant shortage of LPG for domestic consumers.

The distributors, dependent on Confidence Petroleum India Ltd (CPIL), alleged that despite directives prioritising domestic consumption, LPG was being diverted for export to capitalise on high international prices.

Government cites policy compliance, CPIL denies diversion

The petitioners referred to recent orders issued under the Essential Commodities Act and the Natural Gas (Supply Regulation) Order, 2026, which mandate prioritising household LPG supply during crises.

However, CPIL rejected the allegations, stating it was fulfilling pre-existing export commitments and had not violated any policy norms.

Court had earlier termed issue ‘serious’

During earlier hearings, the court had described the matter as “serious” and of “grave importance”, issuing notices to the Centre and the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas.

On Tuesday, the Centre reiterated that macro-level supply challenges arising from global geopolitical tensions were being handled through diplomatic channels. It also said that any localised supply issues could be resolved by state authorities.

Taking note of these submissions, the bench disposed of the petition.

Continue Reading

India News

Om Birla likely to move motion to revoke suspension of 8 opposition MPs today

The Lok Sabha is likely to revoke the suspension of eight opposition MPs today, with a motion expected to be moved by the government following consensus on maintaining discipline.

Published

on

Om Birla

The suspension of eight opposition Members of Parliament in the Lok Sabha is expected to be revoked on Tuesday, with Speaker Om Birla likely to initiate the process, according to sources.

The MPs, including seven from the Congress and one from the CPI(M), were suspended on February 3 for unruly conduct during the first phase of the Budget session after a resolution was adopted by the House.

Motion to be moved in Lok Sabha

Congress leader K Suresh said that Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju is expected to move a motion around noon seeking revocation of the suspensions.

Although the suspension was initially imposed for the entire session, scheduled to conclude on April 2, opposition parties have consistently demanded reconsideration since the second phase of the session began on March 9.

Agreement on maintaining decorum

At a recent meeting convened by the Speaker, both ruling and opposition sides reportedly agreed on maintaining discipline in the House.

Key understandings include:

  • No member will enter the well of the House to protest
  • Papers will not be torn or thrown toward the Chair
  • MPs will not climb onto officials’ tables

The Lok Sabha Secretariat has also reminded members to keep areas within the Parliament premises obstruction-free to ensure smooth movement.

Speaker raises concern over conduct

Earlier, Om Birla had expressed concern over the use of banners, placards, and inappropriate language by some MPs. In a letter to party leaders, he stressed the need to uphold the dignity and traditions of parliamentary democracy.

He had also indicated that actions like suspension are taken in cases of serious misconduct, such as climbing onto tables during proceedings.

Suspended MPs

The suspended MPs include Gurjeet Singh Aujla, Hibi Eden, C Kiran Kumar Reddy, Amarinder Singh Raja Warring, Manickam Tagore, Prashant Padole, Dean Kuriakose (Congress), and S Venkatesan (CPI-M).

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com