English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

300 WhatsApp numbers of Indians were targeted: Congress after US court verdict on Pegasus

In this case, a U.S. judge favored Meta Platforms’ WhatsApp, concluding that NSO Group had exploited a vulnerability in the messaging service to deploy spyware for unauthorized surveillance.

Published

on

A recent ruling by a U.S. court has deemed Israel’s NSO Group accountable for its Pegasus spyware, inciting strong criticism from Congress leader Randeep Surjewala. Surjewala emphasised that the court’s decision bolsters allegations that 300 WhatsApp numbers in India were compromised.

In this case, a U.S. judge favored Meta Platforms’ WhatsApp, concluding that NSO Group had exploited a vulnerability in the messaging service to deploy spyware for unauthorized surveillance.

Surjewala took to social media platform X to assert, “The Pegasus Spyware case verdict proves how 300 WhatsApp numbers of Indians were targeted in the illegal spyware racket.”

He raised several questions directed at the Indian government, including inquiries about the identities of the 300 targeted individuals, specifically asking, “Who are the two Union Ministers? Who are the three Opposition leaders? Who is the Constitutional Authority? Who are the journalists? Who are the business persons?” He probed further, questioning, “What information was retrieved by the BJP government and agencies? How was it used – misused and to what consequence? Will appropriate criminal cases be now lodged against political executives/officers in the present government and the company owning NSO?”

Surjewala also posed whether the Supreme Court would take into account the U.S. court’s judgment in the Meta v. NSO case. He queried if the Supreme Court would make public the report from the Committee of Technical Experts on Pegasus Spyware, submitted in 2021-22, and whether it would investigate further given the ruling affirming that 1,400 WhatsApp numbers, including 300 from India, were targeted.

He suggested that Meta should be responsible for releasing the names of the 300 individuals, citing their significant subscriber base in India and a corresponding ‘duty of care & disclosure’ to its clients.

U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland ruled in favor of WhatsApp’s motion, finding NSO Group liable for hacking and breach of contract. The case will now advance solely to determine the damages owed. Will Cathcart, Head of WhatsApp, described the ruling as a “victory for privacy,” highlighting that they invested five years in their case because they believe spyware companies cannot evade accountability for their wrongful actions.

WhatsApp originally filed the lawsuit against NSO in 2019, seeking both an injunction and damages for unauthorized access to its servers to install Pegasus spyware on victims’ devices six months prior to the lawsuit. The lawsuit asserted that 1,400 individuals, including dissidents, journalists, and human rights advocates, were monitored due to the breach. NSO maintained that Pegasus was utilized by law enforcement and intelligence agencies for crime prevention and national security, specifically targeting terrorists, paedophiles, and criminals.

NSO had previously appealed a 2020 ruling that denied it “conduct-based immunity,” a legal provision designed to protect foreign officials acting in their official capacity. In 2021, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the initial ruling, determining that NSO’s involvement in licensing and providing technical support for Pegasus did not grant it immunity under the U.S. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently declined to hear NSO’s appeal, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com